OUR PRISONS ARE OVERCROWDED!

US prisons aren't overcrowded with illegals .. they're overcrowded with Americans.

In fact, the United States is the biggest jailer on the planet.

The United States has about 5% of the world’s population and houses 25% of all the prisoners on the planet.

There's no such thing as overcrowding. The problem is too many committing crimes and expecting nothing to be done to them.
 
You can reduce that exponentially by releasing non-violent offenders.

Of course, then who is going to do the work for the government and major corporations that profit from prison labor?

"According to the Left Business Observer, “the federal prison industry produces 100 percent of all military helmets, war supplies and other equipment. The workers supply 98 percent of the entire market for equipment assembly services; 93 percent of paints and paintbrushes; 92 percent of stove assembly; 46 percent of body armor; 36 percent of home appliances; 30 percent of headphones/microphones/speakers; and 21 percent of office furniture. Airplane parts, medical supplies and much more: prisoners are even raising seeing-eye dogs for blind people.”

With all of that productivity, the inmates make about 90 cents to $4 a day.

What a deal. It's essentially slave labor.

Are you saying that because it was a non violent offender it means it wasn't really a crime? A bank robber that goes into a bank, hands the teller a note, and walks out without "using or involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something" is a non-violent offender by definition. Should we release those criminals?
 
Pretty clear he's not saying that

He said release non-violent offenders. A bank robber that goes into a bank, hands the teller a note, and walks out without "using or involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something" is a non-violent offender by definition. Should we release those criminals?
 
People have to understand that pussified punks like Cowardly Fucking Moron will commit trespass to sneak a bag of dogshit onto the neighbor lady's porch, but it's the "other guy" that's at fault.
 
Are you saying that because it was a non violent offender it means it wasn't really a crime? A bank robber that goes into a bank, hands the teller a note, and walks out without "using or involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something" is a non-violent offender by definition. Should we release those criminals?

Not all crimes have to require jail time. And you'd have to ask him which non violent crimes he is referring to. But there are people in prisons for drug crimes that were non violent and we're seeing even conservative governors letting people go because the cost of housing so many prisoners is overwhelming state budgets.
 
Which is the point of conversation here, STY was saying that police for profit was worse than this, and I want him to tell me which civilian police force has been replaced by a corporation.

To be fair there is a point to be made here except he's too stupid to make it. Profit and corporation aren't the same thing. My local police force makes money every year. They're paid by the feds and in return they do A LOT of DEA assistance work. They also spend a lot of time writing traffic tickets...and busting parties where minors are drinking and drugging and then putting all of them on probation. You don't have to a corporate police force a la "Robo-Cop" to be profitable.
 
Look, this is the situation and how to fix it.

Non violent, less than one year, jail no prison.

Prisons need to beef up the rehab part.

With no rehab, you will see the same people come through the system over and over.

The inmates with the lowest chance for recidivism, are life term inmates that must get approved by a parole board. Maybe it is about expanding the parole, vs anything else.
 
Look, this is the situation and how to fix it.

Non violent, less than one year, jail no prison.

Prisons need to beef up the rehab part.

With no rehab, you will see the same people come through the system over and over.

The inmates with the lowest chance for recidivism, are life term inmates that must get approved by a parole board. Maybe it is about expanding the parole, vs anything else.

Why do you think they want to be rehabbed and how many times should they be able to avail themselves of this free opportunity?

It's been shown that people don't change their behavior, until what they're receiving from their behavior becomes unbearable and even then it's not enough to convince someone to change.

One thing that most people are avoiding addressing, is where someone with drug charges and violent behavior charges are usually plea bargained down to the guilty on the drug charges.
Should we now do away with plea bargains; because I'm for that.
 
Not all crimes have to require jail time. And you'd have to ask him which non violent crimes he is referring to. But there are people in prisons for drug crimes that were non violent and we're seeing even conservative governors letting people go because the cost of housing so many prisoners is overwhelming state budgets.

No need to ask him. Since no distinction was made, it includes all non violent crimes.
 
'Three Strikes' Sentencing Laws

Under the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, the "Three Strikes" statute provides for mandatory life imprisonment if a convicted felon: (1) has been convicted in federal court of a "serious violent felony"; and (2) has two or more previous convictions in federal or state courts, at least one of which is a "serious violent felony" (the other offense may be a serious drug offense). The sentencing enhancements in this law can have a significant impact on a criminal defendant. Read on to learn more about the law and how it works.

What Is A Serious Violent Felony?

The statute defines a serious violent felony to include:
1 - Murder;
2 - Manslaughter;
3 - Sex offenses;
4 - Kidnapping;
5 - Robbery; and
6 - Any offense punishable by 10 years or more which includes an element of the use of force or involves a significant risk of force

The statue also specifically excludes certain felonies such as unarmed robbery offenses or arsons which posed no threat to human life. However, in those cases, the burden is on the defendant to show that the crimes did not involve threats to use a dangerous weapon and that no threat of death or bodily injury was involved. In other words, these can count as strikes unless a defendant proves otherwise.


So can someone show me where someone is in Prison, for "smoking a joint"?
 
Look, this is the situation and how to fix it.

Non violent, less than one year, jail no prison.

Prisons need to beef up the rehab part.

With no rehab, you will see the same people come through the system over and over.

The inmates with the lowest chance for recidivism, are life term inmates that must get approved by a parole board. Maybe it is about expanding the parole, vs anything else.

The only way rehab works is for the one needing it to want it.
 
ABSOLUTELY

All these that promote rehab seem to think that simply offering it means it will work. It's like the three strikes rule. They argue against it but fail to acknowledge that it's not the ONE strike rule. For it to apply, someone has shown they don't want to correct their actions.
 
All these that promote rehab seem to think that simply offering it means it will work. It's like the three strikes rule. They argue against it but fail to acknowledge that it's not the ONE strike rule. For it to apply, someone has shown they don't want to correct their actions.

I have a friend who's daughter is addicted to opiates (not heroin) and him and his wife have tried everything to try and convince her to go to rehab.
Her daughter's father has full custody of her and my friend and his wife ended up adopting her son.

They've tried to provide her with jobs (they own their own business), have provided her with housing, and any number of attempts to help her.

She has stolen from them and refuses to seek or accept help.

I hated seeing the pain on their faces, every time she "kicked" them and now they've pretty much written her out of them helping her.
She's their daughter, they still keep track of her, and heaven help anyone who hurts her; but no more giving anything.
 
I have a friend who's daughter is addicted to opiates (not heroin) and him and his wife have tried everything to try and convince her to go to rehab.
Her daughter's father has full custody of her and my friend and his wife ended up adopting her son.

They've tried to provide her with jobs (they own their own business), have provided her with housing, and any number of attempts to help her.

She has stolen from them and refuses to seek or accept help.

I hated seeing the pain on their faces, every time she "kicked" them and now they've pretty much written her out of them helping her.
She's their daughter, they still keep track of her, and heaven help anyone who hurts her; but no more giving anything.

As bad as it is, it's the best action they can take.
 
As bad as it is, it's the best action they can take.

I had some very long discussions with them, regarding this.
I told them that I just wanted them to see it from a different perspective.

It really tore at me, every time; because they tried so hard and she was just using their lover for her, to continue to use them.
 
Back
Top