Obamacare Lite is out!

Again, did I say that?
WTF is wrong with you?

That was the meaning of what you wrote. Make yourself more clear then. You said she's not a Christian because she doesn't care about the poor. Define why you say that then if my response was wrong
 
Without a republican designed mandate in Obamacare the only people who will buy insurance will be those who are sick ...
Premiums will skyrocket 10X what it did last year.

Thats a typical left wing sense of business you got there sport. If less people are willing to purchase and more insurance carries will be allowed to cross state lines void of any government mandated lobby appointed monopoly....the cost will GO DOWN not up, as the people now have a choice. If you are young and don't think you need a Cadillac coverage....you will be able to purchase catastrophic coverage with a high deductible and up to a million dollar coverage for a few bucks a month....while you save money in your privately controlled health care savings trust, established by the American Health Care Act...for normal illnesses and use. You will not have to run to the ER every time you get a tooth ache and demand some type of tax payer funded pain killers....that would cost the tax payer about 2k per visit.

Once the physician's offices begin losing customers because they can no longer bilk Uncle Sam with overpriced billing....the average cost will soon go down as well. Welcome to the world of supply and demand....not an artificial chronie capitalism driven by lobby dollars and corrupt politicians.

Next. The drug industry needs an attitude adjustment. Do you know how much more Big Pharma made under Obama Care care than before the act became law? They went wild with the overpricing as it was uncontrollable....hitting the people most who could least afford the cost hikes....those who are ill and needed the med's to live....its either pay up or die.
 
Last edited:
That was the meaning of what you wrote. Make yourself more clear then. You said she's not a Christian because she doesn't care about the poor. Define why you say that then if my response was wrong

Please quote where I said " you are not a Christian".
I will wait.
Thanks
 
That was the meaning of what you wrote. Make yourself more clear then. You said she's not a Christian because she doesn't care about the poor. Define why you say that then if my response was wrong

Please quote where I said " you are not a Christian".
I will wait.
Thanks
 
Right.
If she knew what Jesus' message was she would advocate for the poor, as opposed to the rich.

I am talking about her knowledge not her beliefs.

Do you really not understand the difference?

And she would advocate for the poor how?
 
Please quote where I said " you are not a Christian".
I will wait.
Thanks

Do you really know what Jesus said concerning the Poor? His service to the poor was of a spiritual nature....his duty was not to feed the poor as the poor will be with you "ALWAYS". In fact Jesus openly chastised the poor who followed after Him when He feed the multitudes with the loaves and fishes....He said, in a paraphrased manner, " You follow Me...not because of the words and teaching you hear concerning your eternal salvation of your spirit....but you follow me seeking to get food again that will perish along with your physical body."

YOU WILL ALWAYS HAVE THE POOR AMONG YOU. -- John 12:8

Why? Because poverty comes from acts of nature, accidents, and free will choices...all uncontrolled by any Government mandate.

Jesus purpose as God incarnate on earth was not to serve the physical body...but to teach the truth, THE GOSPEL as delivered from Heaven. His service to the poor was to teach the Gospel -- Luke 7:22

Jesus Chastised the 5000 poor He had feed for following Him only for the food. -- John 6:26-27

Thus its not the church's duty to serve the poor....its up to the individual single members to have charity upon those they know needs the help...its called compassion. The Church that Christ constructed....was to spread the Gospel. Once that gospel truth is accepted then Christian compassion can be exampled by every member of that church...if they are truly Christian.
 
Do you really know what Jesus said concerning the Poor? His service to the poor was of a spiritual nature....his duty was not to feed the poor as the poor will be with you "ALWAYS". In fact Jesus openly chastised the poor who followed after Him when He feed the multitudes with the loaves and fishes....He said, in a paraphrased manner, " You follow Me...not because of the words and teaching you hear concerning your eternal salvation of your spirit....but you follow me seeking to get food again that will perish along with your physical body."

YOU WILL ALWAYS HAVE THE POOR AMONG YOU. -- John 12:8

Why? Because poverty comes from acts of nature, accidents, and free will choices...all uncontrolled by any Government mandate.

Jesus purpose as God incarnate on earth was not to serve the physical body...but to teach the truth, THE GOSPEL as delivered from Heaven. His service to the poor was to teach the Gospel -- Luke 7:22

Jesus Chastised the 5000 poor He had feed for following Him only for the food. -- John 6:26-27

Thus its not the church's duty to serve the poor....its up to the individual single members to have charity upon those they know needs the help...its called compassion. The Church that Christ constructed....was to spread the Gospel. Once that gospel truth is accepted then Christian compassion can be exampled by every member of that church...if they are truly Christian.

Shut the fuck up Ralph.
I don't give a single fuck what you say.

I have told you before don't quote me.

Drunken asshole
 
Which goes back to what I said about you believing the gov't should take care of everyone

No.
Like I just said to your butt buddy yurt
My meaning resides in the actual words I used.
Not in your perception of them
Not in your conclusion of them.
Not in what you think I really mean.
Not in what you guess I am implying.

The proof of this truth is in your misperception that I told Norah she wasn't a Christian.
I neither said nor implied that, it was entirely your conclusion.
You were wrong then....you are wrong now.
 
Which goes back to what I said about you believing the gov't should take care of everyone

You see, when it comes to Healthcare, the Government already takes care of everyone, but before Obamacare, they did it in a very inefficient way that shifted the costs to others in an uneven and very unfair way, if we repeal Obamacare we will go back to that, if we improve it maybe we wont. If we go to single payer it will be the most efficient way.
 
You see, when it comes to Healthcare, the Government already takes care of everyone, but before Obamacare, they did it in a very inefficient way that shifted the costs to others in an uneven and very unfair way, if we repeal Obamacare we will go back to that, if we improve it maybe we wont. If we go to single payer it will be the most efficient way.

Single payer is the solution...
With Trumpcare the middle class and the wealthy would pay much more and the poor will get much less than what we have become accustomed to in the last few years...
The only winners with Trumpcare are the blood thirsty insurance companies ...
There is no danger of it passing anyway...
 
No.
Like I just said to your butt buddy yurt
My meaning resides in the actual words I used.
Not in your perception of them
Not in your conclusion of them.
Not in what you think I really mean.
Not in what you guess I am implying.

The proof of this truth is in your misperception that I told Norah she wasn't a Christian.
I neither said nor implied that, it was entirely your conclusion.
You were wrong then....you are wrong now.

So your words are b.s. then
 
Are you saying that efficiency and waste aren't linked?
'Efficiency' is getting the most for every dollar spent....like Medicare. "Waste" is paying CEOs tens of millions of dollars, which takes away the ability to treat more patients.
 
You see, when it comes to Healthcare, the Government already takes care of everyone, but before Obamacare, they did it in a very inefficient way that shifted the costs to others in an uneven and very unfair way, if we repeal Obamacare we will go back to that, if we improve it maybe we wont. If we go to single payer it will be the most efficient way.
Before, and even after ACA, the govt. didn't actually take care of everyone. Insurers were free to charge whatever they want....kick people off after they become ill....deny coverage to those with pre existing conditions....and have much higher rates in the individual market.

The only thing ACA did was to correct some of these issues. The private health insurers still provide the coverage.
 
Single payer is the solution...
With Trumpcare the middle class and the wealthy would pay much more and the poor will get much less than what we have become accustomed to in the last few years...
The only winners with Trumpcare are the blood thirsty insurance companies ...
There is no danger of it passing anyway...
I don't believe that's necessary yet. A public option will provide the necessary competition that Conservatives are selling as a panacea to the high cost of health insurance.

Medicare is the most efficient means of providing healthcare. With a healthier demographic buying in, it helps everyone.
 
Back
Top