Nixon Redux: Comey Fired

NOVA said:
Really>?....why not.....every idiot on MSNBC and CNN use it at every opportunity.....its what the pinhead Dems in the congressional
investigations are hoping to prove....
Click to expand...

Every con idiot uses it at every opportunity. Don't leave that out of your rant.
 
christiefan915 said:
First he loved Comey, then he hated him, then he loved him again...

Serious question. Will you believe it if there is damning factual evidence re: trump and Russia?
Click to expand...

Like the Dems...first they hated him for investigating Hillary, then they loved him for letting her off the hook, and then they loved
him some more hoping he would proved Trump and russian "collusion"....that word you don't use.
 
NOVA said:
Like the Dems...first they hated him for investigating Hillary, then they loved him for letting her off the hook, and then they loved
him some more hoping he would proved Trump and russian "collusion"....that word you don't use.
Click to expand...

That's right, I don't. I've used "hacking", "meddling", "interfering", "co-operating" and similar words.
 
christiefan915 said:
Every con idiot uses it at every opportunity. Don't leave that out of your rant.
Click to expand...

Don't see how you can avoid using it if you're talking about the purpose of the investigations.....thats what pinheads are trying to prove....for almost a year now....

 
NOVA said:
Don't see how you can avoid using it if you're talking about the purpose of the investigations.....thats what pinheads are trying to prove....for almost a year now....
Click to expand...
no collusion =nobody really cares/it only matters if it's gotcha on Trump
 
christiefan915 said:
That's right, I don't. I've used "hacking", "meddling", "interfering", "co-operating" and similar words.
Click to expand...

Why....no one is trying to prove any of that....those allegations are already taken as fact.....even without proof.....the Russians are coming....

 
anatta said:
I do know the rank and file FBI are not happy with Comey.
They think he's show off/erratic. I was watching Catherine Herridge awhile ago and she reported there was genuine consternation that Comey INSISTED on evidence of Clinton's intent before he would indict.

Of course the "gross negligence" statute does not require it..So Comey ended up pissing them off too.
Click to expand...

How can you not fire someone for that? He basically broke the law and he's the chief law enforcement officer.
 
NOVA said:
Why....no one is trying to prove any of that....those allegations are already taken as fact.....even without proof.....the Russians are coming....
Click to expand...

The allegations have led to an investigation. The investigation is ongoing. Do you know something the rest of us don't?
 
NOVA said:
Comey helped Trump get elected......Trump shows his gratitude ? lmao!!!

Comey should have been fired when he took it upon himself to make himself the de facto leader of the Dept. of Justice....

He was also, in fact, one of the main reasons Hillary lost the election.....

His decision not to charge Hillary in the email matter was not his to make...that should have been decided by the Dept. of Justice, not the Dir. of the FBI....

He assumed power that was not his to take....
Click to expand...

I wonder if they're going to let him clean out his office, without supervision.
That way; he can shred all the evidence that he was hanging onto, regarding Hillary, that he was going to use to blackmail her.
 
christiefan915 said:
Most of us have that quirk. I'm pretty sure if and when it gets to that point, any evidence will be made public.
Click to expand...

What if there's nothing to it? Suppose you're Trump and you know there's nothing to it.

But your FBI director has a history of grandstanding and he's in charge of the Russian investigation.

Do you fire him?
 
Darth Omar said:
How can you not fire someone for that? He basically broke the law and he's the chief law enforcement officer.
Click to expand...
prosecutorial discretion..
There is no question she was guilty, and there is no need for intent under gross negligence.

It was bizarre, but still I don't think Comey should have been put in that position;
the Obma DoJ was politically corrupt and got away with it by punting to Comey
 
Milagro said:
They took their time, Comer was a dead man walking.

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Yep.....
Bill said:
He is gone no matter who wins.....
Click to expand...

He burned all the right bridges.....

rumpf wants/needs a yes man, someone he can trust.... Not a wild card that has already pulled some stunts~perhaps betrayed(in some minds) his "handlers"..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top