You don't protest racism.
Not when its faux and against Law Enforcement.
You don't protest racism.
You keep dodging the point about Trump’s offer.
If the kneelers don’t know someone in prison, surely their fans do. Trump is willing to pardon people.
But no takers. And you even conceded that it was because Trump would take credit for it. You think the poor bugger in prison cares who gets credit for their release?
I think I’m done taking you seriously.
It’s not a talking point—it’s a fact.
You even conceded it was because Trump would take the credit. Why is Trump getting credit an issue?
And again w/ the lie. That's not what I "conceded."
You're hopelessly dishonest. Or, you just can't read. It's up to you.
Ruse? Local elections offer the quickest avenue for change. Note Ferguson election results from Tuesday.
Hmmmmm...and if Trump did pardon one person, he'd trumpet that as "solving the problem" and how he has done more than "any other President in history" (just like he did w/ Puerto Rico), and there would still be zero progress on unequal treatment under the law in general.
Honestly, and I don't mean this in a disrespectful way, you only have a very surface understanding of this issue, and of what their concerns are. Most are protesting because of how they see the black community being treated - they're not protesting because it necessarily affects them personally, or because they have a family member in jail.
I do. I vote with my wallet they want to protest fine it's their right. And it's my right to take my business elsewhere. To be honest I rarely watch the NFL, it's strictly college ball for me.
OK. You have the country's attention. How about starting a massive 'get out the vote' campaign? The timing is perfect, just as it was when Kap. failed miserably in his ploy. Idiot didn't even vote.
There are ways to exact change, if that's what the players actually want.
Here is the post. Read it again - carefully.
My point is more that he'd make a big show about the pardon, and would claim success & this would end the issue for him. It's fine that he takes "credit" for the pardon - but it goes well beyond that. He'd take credit (as he should), but then claim that he addressed the entire issue - just like he did w/ PR.
How can you not get that? Do you really not understand what I'm saying there? Are you sure you should be posting on a political message board?
Natures way of cleansing the gene pool
Just like I thought: you put Trump getting credit over the welfare of someone serving a life sentence.
You must feel pretty strongly about seeing to it that Trump doesn’t get credit for it.
The young people I know who have died from opioids came from two parent families who were upper middle class with the exception of one young man whose father died in a construction accident. I feel blessed my children never became users.In Atlanta I know many seniors who have lost grandchildren and nieces and nephews to Opioids. They are going to funerals for young people so often, I hate to ask. I mean normal, educated, middle or upper class families. Its not just for ghetto people.
These young people are college educated or in college, upwardly mobile.. . I can't find any socio-economic or religious group that hasn't been affected.
What a friggin' liar.
Despicable, Darth. A total lie. Grow up.
Hmmmmm...and if Trump did pardon one person, he'd trumpet that as "solving the problem" and how he has done more than "any other President in history" (just like he did w/ Puerto Rico), and there would still be zero progress on unequal treatment under the law in general. [Thing]
This is why Ritter would actually like to see the players give Trump names to review. He understands why they’d be reluctant to do so from a political perspective but thinks “calling him on his bluff” may get deserving people out of prison.
Is that something Trump could dangle over the NFL’s head for the rest of his presidency? Yes. But if you have an opportunity to free a non-violent person from an unjustly long sentence — if you have a chance to truly give someone his or her life back — might that dangling be worth it?
I have no idea what the right answer is.
https://www.seattletimes.com/sports...-pardon-offer-is-well-intentioned-but-flawed/
_________________
Just, wow.
Allow me to help you. If you can only find one person who is serving an unjustifiably long prison sentence and this is the issue you are fighting for—and you have the opportunity to fix it, you fix it. Screw everything else.
Even the perception that bastard Trump might one-up you.
Even that. Anything else, one has to wonder what it is you care about most.
This is why Ritter would actually like to see the players give Trump names to review. He understands why they’d be reluctant to do so from a political perspective but thinks “calling him on his bluff” may get deserving people out of prison.
Is that something Trump could dangle over the NFL’s head for the rest of his presidency? Yes. But if you have an opportunity to free a non-violent person from an unjustly long sentence — if you have a chance to truly give someone his or her life back — might that dangling be worth it?
I have no idea what the right answer is.
https://www.seattletimes.com/sports...-pardon-offer-is-well-intentioned-but-flawed/
_________________
Just, wow.
Allow me to help you. If you can only find one person who is serving an unjustifiably long prison sentence and this is the issue you are fighting for—and you have the opportunity to fix it, you fix it. Screw everything else.
Even the perception that bastard Trump might one-up you.
Even that. Anything else, one has to wonder what it is you care about most.
Um, yeah - which is completely different from your characterization.
Sick.
I do. I vote with my wallet they want to protest fine it's their right. And it's my right to take my business elsewhere. To be honest I rarely watch the NFL, it's strictly college ball for me.
That's your problem. Trying to think..![]()