Mueller is a man of integrity-Trumptards heard truth

StoneByStone said:
Trumpsters know he's guilty, they just don't care. I don't think any of this business with Mueller will matter.
Click to expand...

GUILTY OF WHAT???!!! No one can seem to answer this question with anything other than lies and opinions. What crime has he committed. Mueller conducted a two year investigation and NADA! Do you idiots on the left understand what NOTHING means?

Good lord; the stupid on the left is stifling.
 
StoneByStone said:
Collusion with Russia and obstruction of justice.
Click to expand...

LIE and LAME.

Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and I have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.
 
Callinectes Ocasio-Cortez said:
Yes. Twice, and I'm not reading it again . Copy and paste the compelling evidence you have seen, I will provide snarky comments, and you can submit it to AG Barr.
Click to expand...

So you haven't read it...you're just pretending you did because you don't want to answer for the fact that all your notions about it were wrong. That your instincts steered you down the wrong path again. That your judgment was poor again. That you trusted the wrong people again.

What do you make of this?

First, a traditional prosecution or declination decision entails a binary determination to initiate or declin e a prosecution, but we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment. The Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) has issued an opinion finding that "the indictment or criminal prosecution of a sitting President would impermissibly undermine the capacity of the executive branch to perform its constitutionally assigned functions" in violation of "the constitutional separation of powers." 1 Given the role of the Special Counsel as an attorney in the Department of Justice and the framework of the Special Counsel regulations , see 28 U.S.C. § 515; 28 C.F.R. § 600.7(a), this Office accepted OLC's legal conclusion for the purpose of exercising prosecutorial jurisdiction. And apart from OLC's constitutional view, we recognized that a federal criminal accusation against a sitting President would place burdens on the President's capacity to govern and potentially preempt constitutional processes for addressing presidential misconduct.
Click to expand...
 
StoneByStone said:
Yes, but if you read the report with basic common sense and self-honesty, it's pretty clear he tried to collude. It's like how there wasn't enough evidence to charge OJ Simpson with murder but.... come on.
Click to expand...

What is clear from the report is that Mueller was wasting Taxpayers dollars and desperately struggling to find something.....and failed. Dunce.

I have the report; what page and paragraph do you want to support your laughably stupid claims with?
 
Truth Detector said:
GUILTY OF WHAT???!!! No one can seem to answer this question with anything other than lies and opinions. What crime has he committed. Mueller conducted a two year investigation and NADA! Do you idiots on the left understand what NOTHING means?

Good lord; the stupid on the left is stifling.
Click to expand...

You should try meditation.
 
Callinectes Ocasio-Cortez said:
He will read it, slap his forehead and exclaim "what was I thinking!, Thank you LV426!!", and immediately dispatch DOJ stormtroopers to arrest the president
Click to expand...

So you lied about reading the Mueller report.

You didn't read it.

You never have and you never will.

Instead, you're searching for any way you can to avoid accountability for the shit judgment, poor instincts, and rotten character that led you down the path of defending Trump.

What a fucking loser.
 
katzgar said:
Mueller is a decorated Vietnam combat vet, you are disgusting
Click to expand...

And a liar.

He never read Mueller's report; he's just lying that he did so he can try and change the subject so he doesn't have to answer for his shit instincts and poor judgment.
 
LV426 said:
So you haven't read it...you're just pretending you did because you don't want to answer for the fact that all your notions about it were wrong. That your instincts steered you down the wrong path again. That your judgment was poor again. That you trusted the wrong people again.

What do you make of this?
Click to expand...

What do you make of this decision from the guy who makes them?

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and I have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.

Now do everyone a favor and STFU; We get it; you're an arrogant dumb ass.
 
LV426 said:
And a liar.
He never read Mueller's report; he's just lying that he did so he can try and change the subject so he doesn't have to answer for his shit instincts and poor judgment.
Click to expand...

Neither have you shit-for-brains; you sound like a recording from Jake Tappers TDS show.
 
Stretch said:
"If we had had the confidence that the president had not clearly committed a crime, we would have said so," Mueller announced.
He once again pointed to inconclusive evidence. They did not have that confidence. They did not have that evidence to indict.
Click to expand...

MORON.

Mueller literally said why he wasn't charging Trump, even though he had enough evidence to do so. You would know that reason if you read the report, which you haven't because you are a coward.

First, a traditional prosecution or declination decision entails a binary determination to initiate or declin e a prosecution, but we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment. The Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) has issued an opinion finding that "the indictment or criminal prosecution of a sitting President would impermissibly undermine the capacity of the executive branch to perform its constitutionally assigned functions" in violation of "the constitutional separation of powers." 1 Given the role of the Special Counsel as an attorney in the Department of Justice and the framework of the Special Counsel regulations , see 28 U.S.C. § 515; 28 C.F.R. § 600.7(a), this Office accepted OLC's legal conclusion for the purpose of exercising prosecutorial jurisdiction. And apart from OLC's constitutional view, we recognized that a federal criminal accusation against a sitting President would place burdens on the President's capacity to govern and potentially preempt constitutional processes for addressing presidential misconduct. 2
 
Truth Detector said:
What part of PRESUMED innocent do liberal morons struggle to comprehend? As for OJ, he had his trial and was found to be not guilty. Regardless of your or my OPINION about the verdict, he was innocent in the eyes of the law.
Click to expand...

Yes, I get that. But we know he was most likely guilty.
Trump had secret meetings with Russian officials, publicly asked them to hack Hillary's server which they did, and accepted the offer from Russia to help them win the election.

At the risk of bringing up Godwin's Law, there is no smoking gun for the Nazis ordering the Holocaust. But.... come on.
 
Superfreak said:
ROFLMAO... there was no collusion, the report made it clear there was not enough evidence to charge anyone with collusion/coordination/conspiracy.
Click to expand...

There might not have been criminal collusion, but Mueller makes it clear that Trump's team and Russia were colluding with one another.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top