Superfreak
Verified User
You're saying screw the evidence, it was all in Mueller's mind.
That is not at all what i said
You're saying screw the evidence, it was all in Mueller's mind.
Whoosh, that’s the sound of Mueller’s statement going way over your head.Which is legal nonsense lol.
Prosecutors don’t deal in ‘incomplete innocence’. They either indict—or they don’t. And by the way, that doctrine is not only long-standing but it’s more important than the constitutional *question* of whether you can indict a sitting president or not.
Do you agree that Comey should have been fired for tainting Hillary but not indicting her?
Mueller pulled a ComeyWhich is legal nonsense lol.
Prosecutors don’t deal in ‘incomplete innocence’. They either indict—or they don’t. And by the way, that doctrine is not only long-standing but it’s more important than the constitutional *question* of whether you can indict a sitting president or not.
Do you agree that Comey should have been fired for tainting Hillary but not indicting her?
Which is legal nonsense lol.
Prosecutors don’t deal in ‘incomplete innocence’. They either indict—or they don’t. And by the way, that doctrine is not only long-standing but it’s more important than the constitutional *question* of whether you can indict a sitting president or not.
Do you agree that Comey should have been fired for tainting Hillary but not indicting her?
Are you deranged? There was no crime. Shove off.
Which is legal nonsense lol.
Prosecutors don’t deal in ‘incomplete innocence’. They either indict—or they don’t. And by the way, that doctrine is not only long-standing but it’s more important than the constitutional *question* of whether you can indict a sitting president or not.
Do you agree that Comey should have been fired for tainting Hillary but not indicting her?
No, it's not. You simply want it to be true. The really sad part is there is far more evidence that the dems colluded. But you ignore that due to blond hatred of trump
That's the situation alright.
Hillary got painted up & down as a frivolous, careless and negligent liar. But, she walked.
Mueller's report showed no collusion and couldn't "recommend" anything on obstruction. But, the Dems are ready to lynch Trump.
It was a simple gig Mullet.....investigate and give your recommendations to the A.G. to make the final decision. But, no. Punt, dump a
tangled mess on D.C. and then check out of the country for your retirement. Thanks a lot Mr. Boy Scout.
But, but, but......Hillary.
Tell us why Trump was not charged.
Try to not lie like Stretch.
Because Mullet didn’t want to lol.
Write your Democrat congressman and demand an impeachment vote.
Then we’ll see ya in the Senate.
Orange man good?
He is quite the buffoon. But you are blinded by your hatred
It may surprise you to learn that I have a lot of respect for Mueller, despite his antipathy toward Trump. I don't know for sure why he stacked his staff with democrats, but I suspect it was because he smelled the nothing burger on the grill before he took the job and he thought 1) these guys will work until they drop to get something on Trump, so the investigation will be thorough, and 2) when the nothing burger is served by democrats led by an anti-Trumper, maybe things can settle down a little(sorry Bob. Fat chance, lots of house dems don't seem to respect you as much as I do). As for your opinion of me, does that really matter?
Mueller: If it were clear president committed no crime, "we would have said so"
Okay, legal play time is over, time for the political game, where legal don’t matter. Why no articles of impeachment?
Let’s get those financial records so that even the Senate cowards will be convinced
You mean the financial records from before he was even running?