Answered numerous times.
Densest moron on this forum.
No, he wasn't.
Mueller is a man of integrity-Trumptards heard truth
- Thread starter Micawber
- Start date
No, he wasn't.
Ari Melber
Verified account @AriMelber
Ari Melber Retweeted Ari Melber
A Special Counsel source with knowledge of this document says it provides the quotes to show there is “no conflict” between Mueller and Barr’s statements.
1:06 PM - 29 May 2019
92 Retweets
187 Likes
Anchor of @thebeatwithari airing nightly at 6pm ET on MSNBC | NBC News Analyst | MSNBC Chief Legal Correspondent | Lawyer | Emmy-winning reporter
Julia E. Ainsley and TheBeat w/Ari Melber
Where does this document say “no conflict”?
You're saying screw the evidence, it was all in Mueller's mind.
Try again............
"If we had had the confidence that the president had not clearly committed a crime, we would have said so," Mueller announced.
He once again pointed to inconclusive evidence. They did not have that confidence. They did not have that evidence to indict.
Therefore, if Mullet DID conclude he committed a crime, he would indict. Oh wait.................he did NOT indict.
You seem pretty happy about the fact that Mueller didn't announce that trump was completely innocent.
Not enough there to convince the Senate cowards.
Let’s see those financial records that demonstrate fraud and Emoluments violations. Perhaps the Trump bootlickers will not be able to look away.
I can’t fix your massive willful ignorance.
You seem pretty happy about the fact that Mueller didn't announce that trump was completely innocent.
I'm fine. No obstruction charge. No collusion charge.
No obstruction charge. No collusion charge. But not completely innocent, either.
Ask Ari and Julie.
Or, you COULD simply READ the doc for yourself and comprehend that was no conflict between the 2 statements.
Good luck with your assignment.
Cite, from the document, where it says “no conflict”, or be a liar
where's the charge?
Why do you bother Salty? You are arguing with a bunch of people that cannot tell the difference between a girl and a boy. That fairly shows the intellect level.....
Darth Omar
Russian asset
Which is legal nonsense lol.
Prosecutors don’t deal in ‘incomplete innocence’. They either indict—or they don’t. And by the way, that doctrine is not only long-standing but it’s more important than the constitutional *question* of whether you can indict a sitting president or not.
Do you agree that Comey should have been fired for tainting Hillary but not indicting her?
Are you deranged? There was no crime. Shove off.
Superfreak
Verified User
No, it's not. You simply want it to be true. The really sad part is there is far more evidence that the dems colluded. But you ignore that due to blond hatred of trump