Missing the point on mass shootings.

none of which involve taking guns away from people who are not likely to either open fire at random in a school, parade or mall or to commit a gangland execution or driveby.

How do you know they're not going to do that?

Seems like those who buy these weapons intend to use them on innocent people in public.
 
so you believe a cartoon episode explains what the founding fathers believed but dismiss actual quotes and commentaries as 'nobody could know what they meant by that

Yes, a cartoon writer's room filled with college graduates has just as much, if not more insight into the mindset of the Founding Fathers than you do.
 
now, critical thinker, what happens to the federal government if you do away with the US Constitution?

Well, it depends what you replace the Constitution with...I would take inspiration from the Constitutions of all the Western Democracies that were written post-WWII.
 

Antifa is purely and solely anti-fascist. It is a mindset, not an organized group...just like the FBI said.

Also, those responsible for the destruction and mayhem during the 2020 protests were your "very fine people", not antifa:

Far-Right ‘Boogaloo Boys’ Are Trying to Incite Violence at Protests
https://www.rollingstone.com/cultur...ge-floyd-protests-black-lives-matter-1010117/

3 self-proclaimed members of the far-right 'boogaloo' movement were arrested on domestic terrorism charges for trying to spark violence during protests
https://www.businessinsider.com/3-b...s-george-floyd-protest-riot-conspiracy-2020-6

‘Boogaloo Boi’ charged in fire of Minneapolis police precinct during George Floyd protest - I REMEMBER YOU SPECIFICALLY BLAMING BLM AND ANTIFA FOR THIS - TURNS OUT YOU WERE WRONG...AS USUAL
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...-boi-minneapolis-police-building-george-floyd

FBI finds no evidence of Antifa’s involvement in national unrest
https://www.ajc.com/news/fbi-finds-...ement-national-unrest/qVI3U9wb8Q6u1QEvVsJ7AJ/


Antifa is a violent, Communist / Fascist movement, not to mention virulently racist.

Nope. According to the FBI, antifa is a mindset, not a group, and they weren't responsible for the violence during the 2020 protests; your "very fine people" were.

You can't be antifascist and be fascist.


Just because they call themselves anti-fascist doesn't mean they are.

According to the FBI, it wasn't antifa who was causing all the chaos in 2020...it was you and your friends.
 
So what? Antifa is a violent, Communist / Fascist movement, not to mention virulently racist. Just because they call themselves anti-fascist doesn't mean they are.

Antifa has never killed anyone, let alone cops...but you know who has? Your right-wing pals.

Man tied to Boogaloo movement gets 41 years for killing federal officer
https://www.police1.com/legal/artic...for-killing-federal-officer-7yIMyMlhKqA7OXhx/

I seem to remember your stupid ass running your mouth on JPP during the summer of 2020 that antifa was responsible for killing cops.

Turns out antifa weren't the cop killers, your JPP friends were.
 
There is no contradiction. I can be pro-gun and not agree with the NRA's positions on firearms.

What part of the NRA's position on firearms do you disagree with?


I can be pro-education and against teacher's unions for their political and professional positions.

What positions of the teacher's unions are political and professional that you disagree with?
 
you do not give a fuck about innocents caught in crossfires or you would press for the prosecution of police who accidentally shoot or kill those very innocents while doing their job...............sit down and shut the fuck up, you liberal lying assed loser

Zero innocents would be caught in zero crossfire if no one was allowed to own a gun.

Also, more guns only ups the risk of innocents being shot...like what happened here in May:

Man charged in shootout after robbing Wellston store patron of rifle, police say
https://www.ksdk.com/article/news/c...arket/63-d569c7f8-e6ba-4f09-9181-bd73079d7b1a
 
Zero innocents would be caught in zero crossfire if no one was allowed to own a gun.

Also, more guns only ups the risk of innocents being shot...like what happened here in May:

Man charged in shootout after robbing Wellston store patron of rifle, police say
https://www.ksdk.com/article/news/c...arket/63-d569c7f8-e6ba-4f09-9181-bd73079d7b1a

your liberal idiocy is backwards, as usual. your approach would increase crime against innocents because those with criminal intent would not surrender their guns
 
your liberal idiocy is backwards, as usual. your approach would increase crime against innocents because those with criminal intent would not surrender their guns

Every single gun that ends up in the hands of criminals was a gun that was first bought legally by a "responsible gun owner".

Every. Single. One.

No guns just manifest out of nowhere, into a criminal's hands.

They only get guns three ways:

1. They steal them
2. Someone gives it or sells it to them
3. They find it

In all three cases, the gun started its life out as a legally purchased weapon.

About 300,000 guns are stolen from people's homes, businesses, and cars, and 15% of the time, you don't even tell the cops when they are stolen. So that means that about 60,000 guns end up in the hands of WHO KNOWS every year, and the source of their guns are "responsible gun owners".

There is no other source for weapons for criminals. YOU are the source.

So you buy a gun to protect your home, business, and/or car from criminals armed with guns they stole from homes, businesses, and/or cars.
 
your liberal idiocy is backwards, as usual. your approach would increase crime against innocents because those with criminal intent would not surrender their guns

Look, I get it with you...you're a simple person who can only think in simple terms, and the terms within which you are thinking here is that shooting someone is the appropriate response to any act of criminality, no matter its scale, size, motivation, or magnitude.

For you, merely breaking the law is a death sentence.

So what I want to know is, do you hold yourself to that same standard, and if so, would you be perfectly OK with someone gunning you down because you ran a red light?
 
Back
Top