Missing the point on mass shootings.

SmarterthanYou said:
I haven't done anything different on here for 10 years, so if i'd have done anything criminal, i'd already have been arrested
Click to expand...

This is not a safe position to hold...absence of prosecution doesn't mean you won't ever be held accountable.

You already had one visit paid to you by the feds, do you think they're going to be as nice a second time?

Are you really eager to tempt fate that much?
 
SmarterthanYou said:
the ONLY threat i've ever made is that I will respond with violence towards those that threaten me
Click to expand...

Well that ambiguity gives you quite a bit of leeway, doesn't it? Because you consider gun control a "threat".

So you're giving yourself permission here to act violently towards anyone who advocates or enacts gun control.

I doubt a court of law would see it the same way.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
so you don't care that people die, that's rhetorical BTW. we already know you have a depraved indifference to life, except your own. the only thing you care about is gun deaths
Click to expand...

What are you talking about? No one has been a bigger advocate for a strong social safety net on JPP than me.


it's weird that when liberals lose arguments, they always lose them to racists.......why is that?
Click to expand...

I didn't lose an argument because we didn't have one...all we have is you making threats at people for wanting to control gun violence, and me pointing out that most mass shooters make those same threats right before they commit their horrific act of violence.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
there's a very simple and easy way for you not to worry about people like me 'snapping' and that's to stop threatening to take away our rights and property.
Click to expand...

So this is abuser mentality...you're saying here that you're not responsible for your actions because you were provoked.

Same defense wife beaters use.

No one forces or causes you to act violently, YOU MAKE THAT CHOICE YOURSELF.

A violent response is not involuntary. It is premeditated.
 
LV426 said:
So this is abuser mentality...you're saying here that you're not responsible for your actions because you were provoked.

Same defense wife beaters use.

No one forces or causes you to act violently, YOU MAKE THAT CHOICE YOURSELF.

A violent response is not involuntary. It is premeditated.
Click to expand...

some more of your illogical thinking.......when you fly off the rails and can't rationally post, there's no reason to argue with you.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
my thinking is exactly in line with the founders.
Click to expand...

You can't presume to know what the Founders thought because they've been dead for over 200 years.

And not all the Founders agreed with each other on everything.

In fact, they disagreed on way more than they agreed on.

So you're lumping them all together and presuming to know what they thought, despite you never being educated on it.
 
LV426 said:
1. You said you're a violent person.

2. You have made threats at people, groups, and the government on JPP.

3. Up until only very recently were you a member of a Nazi terrorist gang.

4. You have said that you think violent people should have access to guns.

So at what point do we stop taking you as a joke and start taking you seriously as a threat to society? Because all you've done here on JPP is make threats at specific people, at society, and at the government.
Click to expand...

So, members of say Antifa should be banned from owning guns too?
 
Why are we still talking about guns rather than admitting that for as long as America exists, it will remain a shooting gallery?
 
T. A. Gardner said:
So, members of say Antifa should be banned from owning guns too?
Click to expand...

I don't think ANYONE should be allowed to own a gun in this country.

I don't even think cops should be allowed to carry guns.

I think the only time anyone should be allowed to carry a gun is if they are in active training in our military, or in active combat.

And furthermore, if you are anti-antifa, you are pro-fascist.
 
LV426 said:
That's what I'm saying...he's presenting himself as a threat to his community and I warned him that posting this way on JPP could lead to having his guns taken away because someone finally got tired of his bullshit.
Click to expand...

I wish it would. Take the baby's deadly toys away and watch him cry.
 
LV426 said:
I don't think ANYONE should be allowed to own a gun in this country.

I don't even think cops should be allowed to carry guns.

I think the only time anyone should be allowed to carry a gun is if they are in active training in our military, or in active combat.

And furthermore, if you are anti-antifa, you are pro-fascist.
Click to expand...

Okay, except on that last, one can be anti-antifa and be anti-fascist. Those are not mutually exclusive things.

Some other examples of that: I can be pro-gun and not support the NRA. I can be pro-education and against teacher unions.
 
LV426 said:
You can't presume to know what the Founders thought because they've been dead for over 200 years.

And not all the Founders agreed with each other on everything.

In fact, they disagreed on way more than they agreed on.

So you're lumping them all together and presuming to know what they thought, despite you never being educated on it.
Click to expand...

the founders made very clear what they thought on many things, as evidenced by all of the pieces of historical documentation. I suggest you read them.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Some other examples of that: I can be pro-gun and not support the NRA. I can be pro-education and against teacher unions.
Click to expand...

Sure you could be that, but then you'd have to explain the inherent contradiction in your positions, which you won't do and instead will either steal from someone else and try to pass it off as your own, or send me on a wild goose chase for something that doesn't exist.
 
LV426 said:
Your preemptive defense of your imminent mass shooting is "look what you made me do".
Click to expand...

your ridiculous thinking is tantamount to charging the bodega owner because he violently attacked someone who attacked him, but only because the bodega owner said he'd react violently if attacked.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top