Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
what does this thread topic have to do with the first amendment?
Mike Huckabee slams pregnant Natalie Portman
- Thread starter Cancel 2018. 3
- Start date
what does this thread topic have to do with the first amendment?
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
morality is not static. and each of us can and should define morality for themselves.
It was around the 2nd or 3rd page of the thread; I'm surprised you missed it, but you have blinders on when it comes to "your side." It's really interesting to watch, actually.
Minister of Truth
Practically Perfect
Technically it was Medved who called her out. Huckabee merely agreed with her.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
1. so you either lied or are wrong about more than one...which one is it?
2. i just finished reading pages 2 and 3 and did not see it. please enlighten this poor ignorant soul.
Medved's the worst. I actually kind of like Huckabee - he seems like a decent fellow, though I disagree with him on a lot of things.
Medved is hard to listen to, though.
Are you serious? You read pages 2 & 3 and didn't see PMP saying that he wasn't calling out Portman?
Your blinders for the right are bigger than I thought, he who should not be posting...
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
LOL...i love technicalities...he may not have personally said "portman" in his comments, but he clearly was talking about her and single moms. so, imo, he did in fact call her out. and the sentence i copied in the OP seems to be directed at her, if not personally, her and hollywood.
"And that's the story that we're not seeing, and it's unfortunate that we glorify and glamorize the idea of children out of wedlock."
Minister of Truth
Practically Perfect
I love listening to Medved. 
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
1. you said "righties", indicating more than one....so far all you've given is only one person. why can't you fess up and admit you were wrong?
2. look onceler, i said i didn't see it. you made the claim, back it up. so far you've claimed more than one rightie....its looking real bad for you right now. no wonder you refuse to say which post.
Trust me - it doesn't look bad for me. Anyone can read PMP's posts on pgs. 2 & 3 of this thread, and see what he says.
Once again, it looks bad for you & your English comprehension. Frankly, I'm amazed; I realize you're desperate for the gotcha on me, he who should not be posting, but this ain't it.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
1. so you can't admit you either lied or were wrong in claiming more than one rightie...got it.
2. that you can't find his one post is telling. i'm going to go with you either lied or are wrong about PMP as well. like i said, looks very bad for you. you screw up on the number claim, now you can't find PMP's post. typical for you.
In all seriousness, he who should not be posting - did you really read through the entirety of pages 2 & 3, and not see PMP say that (and not just once, I might add?)
I don't believe you. If that were true, it would be very alarming.
As for the plural, I was fairly certain I had seen it on this or the other Portman thread, but I'm not going to run around "furiously" looking for it. And I don't need to. According to Ice Dancer, you're complicitly agreeing with something if you don't comment that you disagree with it - and when she said that, you emphatically agreed w/ her and thanked her. So, you & other righties certainly agree....
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
In all seriousness, he who should not be posting - did you really read through the entirety of pages 2 & 3, and not see PMP say that (and not just once, I might add?)
I don't believe you. If that were true, it would be very alarming.
As for the plural, I was fairly certain I had seen it on this or the other Portman thread, but I'm not going to run around "furiously" looking for it. And I don't need to. According to Ice Dancer, you're complicitly agreeing with something if you don't comment that you disagree with it - and when she said that, you emphatically agreed w/ her and thanked her. So, you & other righties certainly agree....
you're just digging your hole deeper and deeper....you could easily just state which post, you don't even have to give a link. but you can't....and its hilarious how you're now claiming that you used plural because of another thread....unfortunately for you...that is not what you said:
but we know onceler never admits when he is wrong.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
onceler claims PMP's post exists on pages 2 or 3 of this thread....using a 40 post page....this is PMP's only post on pages 2 and 3
sucks to be onceler
Phew! I can't tell you what a relief that is, he who should not be posting. I don't use a 40-post page. I knew you couldn't read very well, but PMP's words are pretty clear; I figured even you could get that. He pretty clearly said that Huckabee was not singling out Portman - that his comments were about the media. Try again.
And it's the usual hilarity how you ignored the one part of my response that you realized you got busted on....
And it's the usual hilarity how you ignored the one part of my response that you realized you got busted on....
I actually don't know, and I don't really care. However saying, "Why didn't he say this about Bristol?" was really kinda silly, the girl is actively speaking against the experience. It's really like asking why he didn't call out the Tea Party for promoting higher taxes.
I think pulling a Dan Quayle like this probably isn't going to do his campaign any good. His book is a stinker, maybe he'll not even run.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
[
fuck off you pedantic fuck
fuck off you pedantic fuck