Mike Huckabee slams pregnant Natalie Portman

Huckleberry never had a chance even before this, chiefly because thankfully the Majority of Americans still understand the 1st Amendmend. Huckleberry does not!
 
Damocles said:
Let me see... What is Bristol's message? That it is very difficult and that you should think before you play? That's pretty much the opposite of "glamorizing" it. Maybe that's why he didn't call her out for that.
Click to expand...

What has Portman done to Glamorize it, that was my point. I dont honestly belive either was attempting to glamorizing it.
 
Rana said:
So divorce is out for you, also, and is on the same level as out of wedlock pregnancies?
Click to expand...

Divorce is worse than out-of-wedlock pregnancy, and usually more selfish. The only cases in which divorce is not selfish, in my mind, is when it is due to infidelity and/or abuse. Otherwise, it is a selfish act that causes significant harm to the children involved.

We always hear them criticize woman for having children out of wedlock, but what about divorce, why not the criticism of divorce? I believe it does more damage in some cases then the parent not being married. I know of a lot of people who are having families with no marriage, the parents are together and raise their children, but aren't married.
Click to expand...

Well, this thread isn't about divorce, which is why I didn't criticize it; but I agree it causes a lot more damage than having kids out of wedlock.
 
cawacko said:
What republican politician said anything about that?
Click to expand...

You are mixing different arguments. I pointed that out to Dixie's argument about the media, not responding to what presidental canidates were doing.
 
Jarod said:
You are mixing different arguments. I pointed that out to Dixie's argument about the media, not responding to what presidental canidates were doing.
Click to expand...

Michelle Obama eating a plate of ribs is only an "issue" because she is the one telling other Americans how to eat. Why can't she take up a cause that she has some credibility on, like how Laura Bush (a former librarian) promoted early childhood reading?

princess-letizia-carla-bruni-michelle-obamas-butts.jpg
 
Voltaire said:
Michelle Obama eating a plate of ribs is only an "issue" because she is the one telling other Americans how to eat. Why can't she take up a cause that she has some credibility on, like how Laura Bush (a former librarian) promoted early childhood reading?

princess-letizia-carla-bruni-michelle-obamas-butts.jpg
Click to expand...

1) I belive Michelle Obama looks great and has a healthy looking body.

2) She never said that Americans should not eat a plate of ribs from time to time.
 
Damocles said:
Let me see... What is Bristol's message? That it is very difficult and that you should think before you play? That's pretty much the opposite of "glamorizing" it. Maybe that's why he didn't call her out for that.
Click to expand...

I'm confused - other righties on the thread have said that he wasn't "calling out" Portman. Was he, or not?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top