McCarthy's trumped-up impeachment investigation hits brick wall

do you think the statement from the guy who said he gave $5M to Joe for protection of Burisma is just innuendo?......

https://nypost.com/2023/07/20/biden-bribe-file-released-burisma-chief-said-both-joe-and-hunter-involved/

No. It is misrepresentation and lies and has been debunked.


House Democrats Have Document That Refutes GOP’s Biden Bribery Claims
‘DEBUNKED’
Mykola Zlochevsky, the Ukrainian oligarch Republicans claim may have handed Biden a $5 million bribe, said he never had contact with Biden while he was vice president.

...The evidence is stacking up against Republicans’ (thus far unfounded) claims that President Joe Biden was the recipient of a foreign bribery scheme while serving as vice president.

House Oversight Committee Democrats on Thursday unveiled a document filled out by Mykola Zlochevsky—who their colleagues across the aisle allege may have handed Biden a $5 million kickback—in which the Ukrainian oligarch says he never interacted with Biden when he was vice president.

...

“WE NEVER HAD CONTACTS WITH VP BIDEN DURING HIS VISITS TO UKRAINE,” the questionnaire read. “NO ONE FROM BURISMA EVER HAD ANY CONTACTS WITH VP BIDEN OR PEOPLE WORKING FOR HIM DURING HUNTER BIDEN'S ENGAGEMENT.”...


Congrats PmP you got derped again by right wing media how reported to you the lie but never reported the debunking of the lie.
 
WOW. Many Republicans in the Senate seem to know that McCarthy's Impeachment talk is pointless and without evidence:

- GOP Senator Ken Buck stated that he “hasn't seen any evidence linking Joe Biden to Hunter Biden's activities”

- GOP Senator Shelley Moore Capito stated that she "does not" see enough evidence to impeach Biden.

- GOP Senator Marco Rubio stated that attempts to impeach a sitting President like Biden “should generally be avoided for the interest of the country.”

- GOP Senator John Cornyn stated that House Republicans could investigate the Bidens without launching a formal impeachment inquiry. He then stated that “Rather than doing something they know is unlikely to end the way they would like, maybe they want to emphasize other things.”


There are indications that Senators might refuse to even bring an impeachment to trial.

The consistent complaint you hear Buck and other Republicans say is that after so many years of investigation already they HAVE NOT YET been shown a shred of EVIDENCE OR FACTS connecting any of this to Joe Biden and they believe EVIDENCE AND FACTS are key to opening an Impeachment Inquiry. That you do not use the Inquiry to search for facts (aka "witch hunt"), but instead you use the Inquiry, once you have facts to examine.



So the question is why will the 3 GOP committees and the Weiss investigations already looking into this for 5+ years not share any of those evidence or facts with them?


Oh ya, they admit they have not found any yet....

7z4ron.jpg


7ywndn.jpg


7ywnvk.jpg


589bea70dc97372ddcbc1e16d01b7ed2--left-politics.jpg
 
So you think it is OK to hide the potential and very likely crimes from Brandon and family?

Do you know what a witch hunt means, and not just how Trump misused the term?

The term "hide" has no business there when this is an exercise of endless investigations in search of crimes, that are not predicated by any facts or real evidence.

Is it ok for the FBI, and House to just start searching all through your life or anyone else to see if they can find any crimes? No.

Hunter Biden and the Biden family have now been subject multiple House committee investigations and the David Weiss investigation and come up with complete nothing burgers on any connection to Joe Biden. A complete zero. No evidence... not a shred of proof. And this is with Comer bragging that he has got '100% of the information and no resistance to any of the large number of subpoena's he has sent out to banks and others'.

So doing the 4th or 5th redo of the SAME investigation Benghazi style, will get only Benghazi results. yet another nothing burger.
 
No. It is misrepresentation and lies and has been debunked.

Congrats PmP you got derped again by right wing media how reported to you the lie but never reported the debunking of the lie.

PostMortemPolyp gets derped frequently because he's not real smart. MAGA morons get derped a lot.
 
Yep, and that is what you alt lefties here are screeching that it's unfair to subpoena everyone involved.

Screeching? The Trumpys showed that subpoenas can be ignored. That was a blow against justice getting the truth out. It struck at the heart of congressional investigations.
The reds said they were going to impeach Biden if they got power. They got it and did not because many reds see they have no impeachable offenses or crimes by Biden. The Repugs have been investigating the Bidens for over a year. The right-wing gnus have said repeatedly that the Bidens are corrupt and the weak-minded rightys believed it. Yeah, Hannity and Tucker said it, so it has to be true. But impeachment requires proof not belief. They have none. So they are starting an investigation to see if they can come up with something, anything to charge Joe with.
Trump committed many crimes. That is why he was impeached. The reds are starting at zero trying to find a crime to pin on Joe.
I am sure rightys here cannot understand what a profound difference that is.
 
Last edited:
Screeching? The Trumpys showed that subpoenas can be ignored. That was a blow against justice getting the truth out. It struck at the heart of congressional investigations.

Tiny Dick not only lies a lot, hence "Lyinfish", but like most Trumpers, he projects a lot. The crimes he accuses others of doing is exactly what Trumpers are doing.
 
So you think it is OK to hide the potential and very likely crimes from Brandon and family?

Any crimes committed by Brandon are not impeachable offenses since no one named Brandon holds an office that is subject to impeachment.

That's the problem with an impeachment, it requires actual facts like getting the names correct.
 
do you think the statement from the guy who said he gave $5M to Joe for protection of Burisma is just innuendo?......

https://nypost.com/2023/07/20/biden-bribe-file-released-burisma-chief-said-both-joe-and-hunter-involved/

You mean the same Mykola Zlochevsky who testified in 2019 they he never talked to nor met Joe Biden, and, was caught himself trying to bribe the Ukrainian Government to drop the investigation into him?

First off, coming from Grassley immediately sets off red flags, you lemmings swallow anything if Murdoch says it
 
On what provable ground???????

Can't prove anything without the proper records and subpoenas.

Again, what are you afraid the republicans might uncover? You lefties ought to be cheering this on as you contend Brandon is as pure as driven snow, don't you want him exonerated?
 
Do you know what a witch hunt means, and not just how Trump misused the term?

The term "hide" has no business there when this is an exercise of endless investigations in search of crimes, that are not predicated by any facts or real evidence.

Is it ok for the FBI, and House to just start searching all through your life or anyone else to see if they can find any crimes? No.

Hunter Biden and the Biden family have now been subject multiple House committee investigations and the David Weiss investigation and come up with complete nothing burgers on any connection to Joe Biden. A complete zero. No evidence... not a shred of proof. And this is with Comer bragging that he has got '100% of the information and no resistance to any of the large number of subpoena's he has sent out to banks and others'.

So doing the 4th or 5th redo of the SAME investigation Benghazi style, will get only Benghazi results. yet another nothing burger.

You stupid idiot. The FBI does that every single day in this country. What are you afraid of? Get smarter.
 
You stupid idiot. The FBI does that every single day in this country. What are you afraid of? Get smarter.

Exactly you stupid idiot. Thanks for making my point and not even realizing it.

The NORMAL way is for the FBI or some law enforcement arm to investigate, outside the public eye, and bring forth evidence or proof if they have it, and keep it quiet if they do not.

What is not normal is for the House just to announce today 'ok we are going to start investigations into these 10 congress people this week, and another 10 next week, and so on', when it IS NOT based on any evidence or proof provided thus far. As that is the definition of a witch hunt or fishing exercise.

You now have Republican after Republican saying what you are too stupid to understand. That without some facts or proof FIRST, ... any facts and proof, there should not be a fishing investigation opened and they would not vote for it.

McCarthy knows this. He knows his own caucus would refuse and shut it down and thus why he is now refusing to call the vote that just a few days ago he said was required and that he criticized Nancy Pelosi on prior.

Be smarter LyingFish.
 
Back
Top