McCarthy's trumped-up impeachment investigation hits brick wall

QP! said:
Sure you do if you are going to claim, as fact, that many subpoena's have been ignored since June.


that is how life works. You are claiming to know that many have been ignored, so show us your work.

Or be exposed as a liar.

As well as stupid.
Click to expand...

Let me translate what I previously said in other words. Fuck you, get smarter.
 
archives said:
You mean the same Mykola Zlochevsky who testified in 2019 they he never talked to nor met Joe Biden, and, was caught himself trying to bribe the Ukrainian Government to drop the investigation into him?

First off, coming from Grassley immediately sets off red flags, you lemmings swallow anything if Murdoch says it
Click to expand...

if he's the guy who gave Joe $5M, yes.....if he got caught trying to bribe Ukranians should we be surprised he bribed Biden?......
 
domer76 said:
Keep seeking. When you actually find something, let us know. Until then, it’s merely a wet dream for you.
Click to expand...

time to put Biden and Bobulinksi on the stand and swear under oath

One of them is lying since what they claim is in direct odds with the other

Now who is known to be a liar between them......
 
zymurgy said:
time to put Biden and Bobulinksi on the stand and swear under oath

One of them is lying since what they claim is in direct odds with the other

Now who is known to be a liar between them......
Click to expand...

Go ahead and call the DOJ. I’m sure they’ll give your input all the consideration it deserves.
 
domer76 said:
Go ahead and call the DOJ. I’m sure they’ll give your input all the consideration it deserves.
Click to expand...

watching you shit stains pretend no evidence exists as people line up begging to testify cracks me up.

I won't be calling the DOJ I will just sit here and call you the shit stain you are
 
zymurgy said:
watching you shit stains pretend no evidence exists as people line up begging to testify cracks me up.

I won't be calling the DOJ I will just sit here and call you the shit stain you are
Click to expand...

Watching all you fucks clutching your pearls in excitement over every little tidbit with Hunter Biden is hilarious. So far, the only thing you idiots have is right wing squawking points.

He’s indicted on the gun and tax shit. Fine. Nobody really gives a fuck except you right wing Trumptards.

The rest on bribe taking by Joe? You got nothing. Zip. Zilch. Nada.

BENGHAZI!
 
zymurgy said:
the shit stain is completely unaware that Weiss found crimes - and allowed some of them to expire

you really are a piece of shit clown :laugh:
Click to expand...

Not against Joe he did not you useless piece of garbage.

Who cares is Hunter had a drug problem and did some crimes. Send him to court and let him be judged,


Weiss was a NOTHING BURGER for what it was set up to find by Barr and Trump.

But hey if you a find the Weiss investigation satisfies you because you never expected any connection to JOe, i am good with that.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
because this is the way Nancy did it in 2020......
Click to expand...

Back to Derp school for you, as your stupidity is showing.


When Nancy did in 2020 that is because there was ZERO rules in place saying what was needed to be done, or not, to launch an impeachment inquiry. As such it was up to the speaker to decide.

That did not stop the republi'cans' crying that 'it should not happen without a full house vote' and due to that call and the Trump DoJ and WH passing guidance that the Executive Branch of government WOULD NOT recognize nor participate in any Impeachment Inquiry without a full House vote, Nancy then decided to call a vote and did.

As Jim Jordan also said recently, there is a question if the Judicial Branch would recognize an Impeachment investigation, without a full House vote.


So all that begs the question. If it was republi'cans' who cried to get these rules in place. If they know in advance that they Executive Branch does not have to participate and the Courts MIGHT not participate or be of use to them... why not just call a vote, like Nancy did? Liek Kevin said last week he would never call one without?


That answer is that republi'cans' would vote it down.

Republi'can' after republi'can' has been on the news lately saying if they were shown a single fact or piece of evidence they might support it but that they have not seen any yet. They have NONE.

So is the republi'can' leadership hiding it from their members? Or do they actually have NOTHING???

We all know that answer and it rhymes with 'Bothing Nurger'.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top