no it isn't.The Constitution is over.
Buckle Up.
what is this "legislating to negate" activity you speak of?I'd say they're a mix. The President can advocate for them and even impose them. Congress can review and either affirm them or legislate to negate them just as with any other treaty.
Sure. The House or Senate can initiate a bill that puts specific limits executive power in terms of what can go into a treaty or not. If the President goes along with that, then it's a done deal (or Congress overrides a veto).what is this "legislating to negate" activity you speak of?
and is it appropriate?
wrong. the commerce clause specifically gives power to CONGRESS to regulate commerce with foreign nationsbut tariffs are part of trade and treaty powers and thus clearly firmly under the sole authority of the president.
stop with your globalist lies about the constitution.
![]()
the president handles trade agreements.wrong. the commerce clause specifically gives power to CONGRESS to regulate commerce with foreign nations
it still unconstitutional even when everyone goes along with it and it can be negated by an honest judiciary.Sure. The House or Senate can initiate a bill that puts specific limits executive power in terms of what can go into a treaty or not. If the President goes along with that, then it's a done deal (or Congress overrides a veto).
the constitution trumps the commerce clausewrong. the commerce clause specifically gives power to CONGRESS to regulate commerce with foreign nations
They were right on tariffsNah, Lincoln killed it, and the corrupt post Civil War Supreme Courts made sure it will never come back. Republicans shot themselves in the head along with the entire country. That's why FDR is so hated by them; he made their looting and stealing a little more difficult. JFK actually helped bring it all back with his belief in 'technocracy' and big banking. By 1976 FDR's reforms were all gone, and the bubble economies and off-shoring began. We're now in a similar situation to the rest of the world that the South was compared to the North when Lincoln started his murder and looting rampage; we have a mono-economy built on debt instead of cotton, and the world's shitholes have all the factories and resources.
James Madison shut down a clause being added to the Constitution that gave the Federal govt. the power to use force against a state in 1787, during the Constitutional Convention. Lincoln and the northern financial interests didn't care about that and started a war anyway. They wanted free land, free railroads, and high tariffs.