Mark Levin on Tariffs and courts.

[Hawkeye10]

I do price the beginning of the insanity at just before the Civil War.

 

[Sammy Jankis]

The Constitution is over.

Buckle Up.

no it isn't.

it will rule the world.

buckle down and rise up.

 

[Sammy Jankis]

I'd say they're a mix. The President can advocate for them and even impose them. Congress can review and either affirm them or legislate to negate them just as with any other treaty.

what is this "legislating to negate" activity you speak of?

and is it appropriate?

 

[T. A. Gardner]

what is this "legislating to negate" activity you speak of?

and is it appropriate?

Sure. The House or Senate can initiate a bill that puts specific limits executive power in terms of what can go into a treaty or not. If the President goes along with that, then it's a done deal (or Congress overrides a veto).

 

[SmarterthanYou]

but tariffs are part of trade and treaty powers and thus clearly firmly under the sole authority of the president.

stop with your globalist lies about the constitution.

wrong. the commerce clause specifically gives power to CONGRESS to regulate commerce with foreign nations

 

[Sammy Jankis]

wrong. the commerce clause specifically gives power to CONGRESS to regulate commerce with foreign nations

the president handles trade agreements.

tariffs are part of that

as per the constitution..


libertarians Wrong again!

 

[Sammy Jankis]

Sure. The House or Senate can initiate a bill that puts specific limits executive power in terms of what can go into a treaty or not. If the President goes along with that, then it's a done deal (or Congress overrides a veto).

it still unconstitutional even when everyone goes along with it and can be negated by an honest judiciary.

 

[Sammy Jankis]

you globalist fuck libertarians were never maga.

so keep being banker cocksuckers and just shut the fuck up with your idiotic nonsense and lies.