Mark Levin on Tariffs and courts.

what is this "legislating to negate" activity you speak of?

and is it appropriate?
Sure. The House or Senate can initiate a bill that puts specific limits executive power in terms of what can go into a treaty or not. If the President goes along with that, then it's a done deal (or Congress overrides a veto).
 
Sure. The House or Senate can initiate a bill that puts specific limits executive power in terms of what can go into a treaty or not. If the President goes along with that, then it's a done deal (or Congress overrides a veto).
it still unconstitutional even when everyone goes along with it and it can be negated by an honest judiciary.
 
Last edited:

Article 2 – The Executive Branch​

<<Back
| Table of Contents |
Next>>

The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and
Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when
called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the
Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive
Departments, upon any subject relating to the Duties of their respective
Offices, and he shall have Power to Grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses
against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.

He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of
the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with
the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public
Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of
the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for,
and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the
Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President
alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.
 
Nah, Lincoln killed it, and the corrupt post Civil War Supreme Courts made sure it will never come back. Republicans shot themselves in the head along with the entire country. That's why FDR is so hated by them; he made their looting and stealing a little more difficult. JFK actually helped bring it all back with his belief in 'technocracy' and big banking. By 1976 FDR's reforms were all gone, and the bubble economies and off-shoring began. We're now in a similar situation to the rest of the world that the South was compared to the North when Lincoln started his murder and looting rampage; we have a mono-economy built on debt instead of cotton, and the world's shitholes have all the factories and resources.

James Madison shut down a clause being added to the Constitution that gave the Federal govt. the power to use force against a state in 1787, during the Constitutional Convention. Lincoln and the northern financial interests didn't care about that and started a war anyway. They wanted free land, free railroads, and high tariffs.
They were right on tariffs
 
Back
Top