Mara Lago to be liquidated?

^^^
Thinks "Libertarian" equals violently anti-government.
if necessary, which seems to be something you refuse to acknowledge.

The fact you support Trump
you continually parrot this theory with zero evidence to prove it.

but that you support an authoritarian White Supremacist state.
you continually parrot this theory with zero evidence to prove it.

One thing I've noticed about people like you is that you only support Trump, not Nikki, Desantis or any other Republicans.
you continually parrot this theory with zero evidence to prove it.
 
sorry, but I think that was your ass......now again, repeat after me.....what IS the value of the property........obviously the bank didn't think it was $18M......are we supposed to believe the judge knew more about it than the bank who took it as collateral?.......

Can you not read the above? TRUMP SAID THE VALUE IS LESS THAN $16MM.

This case is about Trump's fraudulent statements.

I posted above that Trump argued it was worth less than $16MM so you are making the case that if the bank says it is worth hundreds of millions then Trump's statement was a fraud. I agree with you.
 
A slight disagreement since they consider Trump to be working for the "little guy" akin to Joe the Plumber*. It's extremely odd for a group of middle-aged losers to admire an elitist globalist when they claim to hate elitist globalists.



*Joe Wurzelbacher died in 2022 at age 49 of pancreatic cancer.

It just proves how easily guys like Obama PhoneDerp are tricked by the elite globalist and made to serve them.
 
Are you that ignorant? The AG has standing, the judge rules on cases brought to him. The laws of the State of New York allow the AG to bring cases such as this to civil court. This is what happened.

Where did you get the idea that the JUDGE does not have standing?

But every picture shows the judge sitting!!!!!!

:laugh:
 
On one hand he argued the value was less than $18 million and on the other hand he argued it was worth over $400 million.

I guess you must be math and legally challenged to not see a problem with that. The value can't be both at the same time.

the value is what the value is, not what the owner says it is.......the tax assessors know that.......bank loan officers know that......apparently you and an incompetent judge are the only people in the world who don't know that.....
 
I actual read what the Banker ACTUALLY said
thanks for your concession.....from your link.....
rump's 2011 financial statement listed his net worth as US$4.3 billion (NZ$7.1 billion), though Deutsche Bank pegged it around US$2.4 billion (NZ$3.9 billion) in an internal credit report as he sought the Doral loan. The bank knocked 75% off the worth he'd given for planned developments, with the internal document citing “the uncertainty in valuing undeveloped land,” for example. The bankers halved the value he'd listed for his golf courses and had a US$94 million (NZ$156 million) difference of opinion over how to account for golf membership deposits among his liquid assets.

couldn't have explained it better myself....

still far above the $18M used by the judge......remanding for a full trial is a given....
 
thanks for your concession.....from your link.....


couldn't have explained it better myself....

still far above the $18M used by the judge......remanding for a full trial is a given....

Ya but you again prove you cannot read.

The $18MM (less) was what Trump used and the Judge merely cited.

And also a bank saying 'we discounted what he said, knowing it might be fraudulent' is not the defense to fraud that you seem to think it is.


If you submit fraudulent loan doc's and the bank rejects them entirely you are still guilty of submitting the fraud, if charged. Only Derps like you, who do not understand the law think, 'but ya the bank suspected it and thus discounted it', is a defense.
 
PmP if you think it wrong for the Judge to cite Trump's stated and written value of Mar a lago being worth $16MM or less, why then do you think it is ok for Trump to have stated that? While then also stating it is worth hundreds of millions?
 
PmP if you think it wrong for the Judge to cite Trump's stated and written value of Mar a lago being worth $16MM or less, why then do you think it is ok for Trump to have stated that? While then also stating it is worth hundreds of millions?

there are no laws against stating your property is worth $16M or $200M or even both on the same day. The issue wasn't what did Trump say. The issue was, what was the property worth. There are laws against judges making findings of fact which are unreasonable in the light of all available evidence. They give grounds for appeal. Hopefully that clears up your mistakes.......
 
the value is what the value is, not what the owner says it is.......the tax assessors know that.......bank loan officers know that......apparently you and an incompetent judge are the only people in the world who don't know that.....

Your getting closer to realizing that Trump committed fraud.
The value is what the value is, not what the owner lies and says it is.

The problem for Trump is the documents he gave the bank are supposed to be a true and fair representation of his assets. By not presenting a true and fair representation, he committed fraud.
 
Ya but you again prove you cannot read.

The $18MM (less) was what Trump used and the Judge merely cited.

And also a bank saying 'we discounted what he said, knowing it might be fraudulent' is not the defense to fraud that you seem to think it is.


If you submit fraudulent loan doc's and the bank rejects them entirely you are still guilty of submitting the fraud, if charged. Only Derps like you, who do not understand the law think, 'but ya the bank suspected it and thus discounted it', is a defense.

do you realize that no one has presented evidence that the loan application was fraudulent?.....
 
if necessary, which seems to be something you refuse to acknowledge.

you continually parrot this theory with zero evidence to prove it.

you continually parrot this theory with zero evidence to prove it.

you continually parrot this theory with zero evidence to prove it.
Before 1/6 you thought it was necessary. Now? Not so much. What changed, DtM? A little reality about prison? LOL


I'm not a lawyer, DumberthanMost, and this isn't a court of law. People are free to read your posts and mine then make up their own minds about who is a piece of shit traitor and who abides by their oath to the Constitution regardless of how long or short they served.

i'm not out to overthrow the constitution, just the men who pervert it.

i'm gonna work on putting together something like 'NFL red zone'..............where all the highlighted shots and kills of important people are nationally broadcast

officers boss around, staff NCOs lead
You hate Chesty Puller, Mad Dog Mattis, Pappy Boyington, Presley O'Bannon and every Marine Corps officer who ever lived. I get it but disagree.

Were you in long enough to earn being a staff NCO? How long did you lead Marines as a staff NCO?

I never had the good fortune to serve for chesty, or mattis, or pappy........in my 6 years I had two great Commanding Officers, one awesome unit commander, and one good 2nd LT.........until my last unit. When I NEEDED leadership and assistance, they failed and bailed


never made it past E-4............but in all my 6 years, I only met two awful Staff NCOs, several average, but the rest of them were top notch leaders
Is that why you joined/started a militia? So you could be an "ossifer" or Staff NCO, Cpl. Doolittle?
 
there are no laws against stating your property is worth $16M or $200M or even both on the same day. The issue wasn't what did Trump say. The issue was, what was the property worth. There are laws against judges making findings of fact which are unreasonable in the light of all available evidence. They give grounds for appeal. Hopefully that clears up your mistakes.......

LOL.
Are you sure you are a lawyer?

It becomes a crime when the claims are made under the penalty of perjury or to achieve a benefit fraudulently.
It isn't a crime to claim you make $10,000 a year or $1,000,000 a year or even both on the same day but when you make a false claim on your tax return about how much you make in a year it becomes a crime. When you make a false inflated claim to a bank about your income in order to get a loan it becomes a crime.
 
It just proves how easily guys like Obama PhoneDerp are tricked by the elite globalist and made to serve them.

Agreed. However, as JPP proves daily, there are others who are more than willing to use people like Fredo to serve their ideology as patsies AKA expendable Americans.

If people like Fredo would understand how they are being manipulated, maybe they'd be more inclined to turn in their abusers.
 
Before 1/6 you thought it was necessary. Now? Not so much. What changed, DtM? A little reality about prison? LOL

I'm not a lawyer, DumberthanMost, and this isn't a court of law. People are free to read your posts and mine then make up their own minds about who is a piece of shit traitor and who abides by their oath to the Constitution regardless of how long or short they served.

Is that why you joined/started a militia? So you could be an "ossifer" or Staff NCO, Cpl. Doolittle?

Do you think that if I was really scared of prison, i'd still be posting the way I do on here? I've not changed one single facet of my positions or the way I post on here, ever.

So maybe what you should do is some serious internal introspection of yourself to see just how much of a loyalist you are, or how much of a liar.
 
do you realize that no one has presented evidence that the loan application was fraudulent?.....

I guess that would make sense since Trump wasn't charged with filing a fraudulent loan application. Do you often argue that a bank robber must be not guilty because no one has presented evidence of him jaywalking?

He is being sued for persistent and repeated filing with lenders and insurers false statements of financial condition that were certified to be true but were clearly false.
 
do you realize that no one has presented evidence that the loan application was fraudulent?.....

Get the fuck off OAN and Fox news and remember you are not to comment on Legal or Business matters as you keep exposing you know nothing, in these fields.

Based on submissions by Trump's legal team and the AG's lawyers, this Judge already reviewed that EVIDENCE (OAN and Fox tell you was never presented) and has already determined FRAUD was committed. That FINDING is already in you derp.
 
LOL.
Are you sure you are a lawyer?

It becomes a crime when the claims are made under the penalty of perjury or to achieve a benefit fraudulently.
It isn't a crime to claim you make $10,000 a year or $1,000,000 a year or even both on the same day but when you make a false claim on your tax return about how much you make in a year it becomes a crime. When you make a false inflated claim to a bank about your income in order to get a loan it becomes a crime.

it is impossible to explain a matter of law to PmP and to think he will comprehend it.


Part of me wants to believe no such lawyer, so dumb could exist, that they read what you say above and think you are wrong and it is fine to make those claims.


But then it is reported that when WH Counsel and other lawyers around Trump told him to simply give back the classified doc's and avoid all the problems, he also had derp lawyers around him, like Epstein, who told him due to the Clinton Socks case, he could defy the subpoena and keep them.

I think, we have to be glad lawyers like Epstein and Habba and PmP (if one) exist, otherwise Trump would do much more sophisticated crime.

My big hope is that if PmP is a lawyer, Trump hires him to his team.
 
I guess that would make sense since Trump wasn't charged with filing a fraudulent loan application. Do you often argue that a bank robber must be not guilty because no one has presented evidence of him jaywalking?

He is being sued for persistent and repeated filing with lenders and insurers false statements of financial condition that were certified to be true but were clearly false.

Yup. But trying to get PmP to understand what the actual charges were, in a legal action is wayyyyy above his pay grade.

As Judge Engoron aptly said in his Summary Judgement...

...“In defendants’ world: rent regulated apartments are worth the same as unregulated apartments; restricted land is worth the same as unrestricted land; restrictions can evaporate into thin air; a disclaimer by one party casting responsibility on another party exonerates the other party’s lies,” Engoron wrote in his 35-page ruling. “That is a fantasy world, not the real world.”..
 
Back
Top