Well that explains it you study a lot of things that are not true. That is even worse.

yes, US supreme court cases are works of fiction.![]()
The Supreme Court has upheld the Gun control act of 1968. The link you cited was not a Supreme Court Decision, it was an article on Natural law. You are looking very foolish.
I am amused by morons who think it is the police who have to sleep in it.
the right to buy guns through the mail from other states without a background check and FFL transfer
No, blacks should cease their disproportionate breaking of the law.
Where does the constitution give courts authority to decide if a law is constitutional? The tenth amendment says such power rests with the states or the people.
You should probably read Article III and Article IV, Clause 2, of the Constitution. The Constitution is the supreme law of the land and the Supreme Court is the arbitor of the Constitution.
"The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court...."
Liberal logic here, hence, it's total bullshit. Instigators should ALWAYS get the short end of the stick.If Stand Your Ground only requires you to be afraid of the black man you choose to murder, then this rule makes perfect sense.
Where does the constitution give courts authority to decide if a law is constitutional? The tenth amendment says such power rests with the states or the people.
You should probably read Article III and Article IV, Clause 2, of the Constitution. The Constitution is the supreme law of the land and the Supreme Court is the arbitor of the Constitution.
"The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court...."
When was that ever a right?
The Tenth amendment is in the Bill of Rights which pertains to individuals, it is usually where smart baggers stop reading. The average bagger stops after the Second Amendment. Article III of the Constitution establishes the federal judiciary.
the founders had clearly stated misgivings about vesting the courts with the power over the constitution and interpreting what it means. those articles do not mean what you say it means.
the founders had clearly stated misgivings about vesting the courts with the power over the constitution and interpreting what it means. those articles do not mean what you say it means.
Liberal logic here, hence, it's total bullshit. Instigators should ALWAYS get the short end of the stick.
What is this sick fascination you degenerates have with unlawful behavior, especially with persons of black color?
Prior to 1968.
I would say its the citizens of MA who will suffer for this one......They did on this one, didn't they dipshit? They fucked up by disproportionately targeting blacks. That's what precipitated this ruling. They shit on themselves.