Let's Boycott United Airlines

[Sailor]

^Here comes the Gandy meltdown! LMAO!

 

[SmarterthanYou]

I can assure you there Jethro I know more about that you do. All you seem to know how to do is google shit and have no idea what it means.

then I implore you to prove me wrong. please. i'll happily admit when i'm wrong about the law, but YOU NEED TO SHOW IT

 

[SmarterthanYou]

I know it from having to get a city counsel to approve my settlement with funds from the general fund.

I believe you are lying. i've posted numerous threads about this. the only reason I can think of that a general fund settlement would be approved is that the insurance wouldn't do it. very rare

 

[Sailor]

then I implore you to prove me wrong. please. i'll happily admit when i'm wrong about the law, but YOU NEED TO SHOW IT

I already have. Obviously you are not bright enough to see it. It is about time for you to google some more stuff you do not understand is it not??

 

[Jarod]

I believe you are lying. i've posted numerous threads about this. the only reason I can think of that a general fund settlement would be approved is that the insurance wouldn't do it. very rare

There is no insurance for an intentional act, I don't think you can get insurance for a 1983 action. In my case there was none, I assure you.

 

[Jarod]

I believe you are lying. i've posted numerous threads about this. the only reason I can think of that a general fund settlement would be approved is that the insurance wouldn't do it. very rare

1. https://www.google.com/amp/www.lati...ezell-ford-settlement-20170208-story,amp.html

 

[Jarod]

I believe you are lying. i've posted numerous threads about this. the only reason I can think of that a general fund settlement would be approved is that the insurance wouldn't do it. very rare

2. http://www.dailycal.org/2017/02/16/...police-use-of-force-in-december-2014-protest/

 

[Jarod]

I believe you are lying. i've posted numerous threads about this. the only reason I can think of that a general fund settlement would be approved is that the insurance wouldn't do it. very rare

3. http://kut.org/post/austin-city-council-approves-325m-settlement-police-shooting-david-joseph

 

[Jarod]

I believe you are lying. i've posted numerous threads about this. the only reason I can think of that a general fund settlement would be approved is that the insurance wouldn't do it. very rare

4. https://www.google.com/amp/amp.dail...lack-lives-matter-activists-lawsuit-for-100k/

 

[Jarod]

I believe you are lying. i've posted numerous threads about this. the only reason I can think of that a general fund settlement would be approved is that the insurance wouldn't do it. very rare

5. http://kstp.com/news/st-paul-city-council-frank-baker-settlement/4446504/

 

[Sailor]

It appears Smarterthanyou is getting his ass handed to him. Why does that not surprise me?

 

[Jarod]

You think he will apologize for calling me a liar? Or should I find 10 more?

 

[Sailor]

You think he will apologize for calling me a liar? Or should I find 10 more?

People like that will never apologize. Not man enough.

 

[Jarod]

I believe you are lying. i've posted numerous threads about this. the only reason I can think of that a general fund settlement would be approved is that the insurance wouldn't do it. very rare

6. https://www.denverite.com/denver-se...-police-law-enforcement-8-month-period-33592/

 

[Micawber]

Good, I have never seen one react that well to being told no... I am guessing you are a well dressed white guy? Right?

LOL money shot

 

[Jarod]

I believe you are lying. i've posted numerous threads about this. the only reason I can think of that a general fund settlement would be approved is that the insurance wouldn't do it. very rare

7. https://www.google.com/amp/chicago....-settlement-for-family-of-philip-coleman/amp/

 

[Jarod]

I believe you are lying. i've posted numerous threads about this. the only reason I can think of that a general fund settlement would be approved is that the insurance wouldn't do it. very rare

8. http://m.wtvm.com/wtvm/pm_/contentdetail.htm?contentguid=od:7VJSS2pq

 

[Jarod]

I believe you are lying. i've posted numerous threads about this. the only reason I can think of that a general fund settlement would be approved is that the insurance wouldn't do it. very rare

9. http://www.uclalawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Schwartz-63-5.pdf

 

[Micawber]

A video can contain hearsay, but it is not hearsay.

If I am on video saying, "Rhonda told me...". That would be hearsay on the video, but a properly authenticated video is not in of itself is not hearsay.

Out of court statement offered in court for the truth, subject to the bazillion exceptions, defines hearsay. The crux of it is whether the video is offered for the truth of a statement recorded in it. If anything else, from a bloody print on it to non hearsay admission of party opponent, it's not hearsay. Cool, let's raid the mini bar.

 

[Micawber]

9. http://www.uclalawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Schwartz-63-5.pdf

Is this an old school beatdown?