Kyle Rittenhouse

You assume too much. You should ask more and assume less.

Kyle is many things to many people, but his fate is in the hands of the court at the moment. Same for those who enabled him to be there that night.

That said, Kyle doesn't fit the definition of terrorist. He's a white supremacist vigilante. Lower than average IQ which is average for those guys.

well, first off, I did ask a question, and secondly, aren't you yourself assuming that he's a white supremacist vigilante based upon no evidence whatsoever??????
 
well, first off, I did ask a question, and secondly, aren't you yourself assuming that he's a white supremacist vigilante based upon no evidence whatsoever??????
What if I am? What's it to you? He's a white supremacist who hung out with other white supremacists in their paintball clubs, one of them the Boogaloo Bois.

You're stupid if you don't believe these assholes won't be murdering more Americans over the next year. They've all gone underground; some just to fade away into the dark and a few, the McVeigh-types you like so much, will attempt to turn the Turner Diaries into reality.

They'll kill more American kids, America will be outraged and the will of We, the People, will crush the stupid motherfuckers.

Why does that concept bother you so much?
 
What if I am? What's it to you? He's a white supremacist who hung out with other white supremacists in their paintball clubs, one of them the Boogaloo Bois.

so what you're doing is wanting to present a facade of 'fairness' in the courts as long as the courts look upon rittenhouse the same false way that you do......got it
 
You assume too much. You should ask more and assume less.

Kyle is many things to many people, but his fate is in the hands of the court at the moment. Same for those who enabled him to be there that night.

That said, Kyle doesn't fit the definition of terrorist. He's a white supremacist vigilante. Lower than average IQ which is average for those guys.

Racism. Redefinition fallacies. Insult fallacies. Argument from randU fallacy. War mongering. Denial of self argument fallacy.
 
You will note that Uncle does not answer questions. He evades and insults.

without a doubt. he intends to portray all of the world in his viewpoint..........anything outside of that is obviously a domestic terrorist.........meaning that anyone who doesn't report all their guns lost in a boating accident is obviously a white supremacist domestic terrorist who wants more collateral damage in their terroristic activities.....................
 
Self defense isn't terrorism.
txio0fn.gif
 
It actually happens quite a lot. There are some really incompetent prosecutors out there.

Not really their fault. They don’t have much of a case. Best they could hope for is if all the jurors already have their minds made up before the trial started as in the O.J. case.
They’re grasping for straws.
 
so what you're doing is wanting to present a facade of 'fairness' in the courts as long as the courts look upon rittenhouse the same false way that you do......got it

Why are you assuming I have power over the Wisconsin legal system? I confess to assuming that Kyle is getting a fair trial. Why do you disagree?

Is this where the average IQ of an average militia white supremacist comes into play?
 
Back
Top