killed 50 from two blocks away from the 32nd floor....

It only fails because liberal snowflakes run from it; especially since it shows that the left really don't care who dies, just how.

Nope, wrong again, idiot. It fails because it's a false equivalency.

Flounder away, douchenozzle.
 
Last edited:
I now have to question your credentials as a lawyer, because it is NOT illegal to yell fire in a crowded theater....especially if there is actually a fire.

Stop being silly, true if its not a fire, but inciting a situation that is dangerous when there is not a fire is illegal.
 
Stop being silly, true if its not a fire, but inciting a situation that is dangerous when there is not a fire is illegal.

Is there a specific law anywhere that states it is illegal to yell fire in a movie theater? Or under what circumstances you can yell in a movie theater?

Can you tell FUCK?
Cat?
BINGO?

I am not a lawyer so I am just curious
 
Is there a specific law anywhere that states it is illegal to yell fire in a movie theater? Or under what circumstances you can yell in a movie theater?

Can you tell FUCK?
Cat?
BINGO?

I am not a lawyer so I am just curious

I dont have any desire to teach a constitutional law class, but Ill give you some tips so you can edify yourself.

Look up the "Fuck the draft" case.
Look up the case about "burning a draft card"
Look up the "fighting words doctrine"

The point is that there are reasonable limits to all Constitutional rights. They are not absolute. A restriction on assault weapons would likely be Constitutional.
 
So much for the overrated theory of heroic gunslinging to protect the people. Good luck picking off a guy shooting with an automatic from the 32nd floor.
 
I dont have any desire to teach a constitutional law class, but Ill give you some tips so you can edify yourself.

Look up the "Fuck the draft" case.
Look up the case about "burning a draft card"
Look up the "fighting words doctrine"

The point is that there are reasonable limits to all Constitutional rights. They are not absolute. A restriction on assault weapons would likely be Constitutional.

Then why isn’t a restriction on muslime immigration reasonable? Seems you guys are pretty absolute on that
 
I dont have any desire to teach a constitutional law class, but Ill give you some tips so you can edify yourself.

Look up the "Fuck the draft" case.
Look up the case about "burning a draft card"
Look up the "fighting words doctrine"

The point is that there are reasonable limits to all Constitutional rights. They are not absolute. A restriction on assault weapons would likely be Constitutional.

BTW because you call something an assault weapon doesn’t make it so

You merely hate these guns because of the way they look. I could just as easily be just as lethal with a shotgun. Are you going to ban them too?

You can bleat all you want. But in two days you will be back to bashing Trump and you will forget about this and there will be no new gun laws.

If Newtown didn’t change anything, this won’t.

Republicans are heading into primary season. Let them say they are passing gun control laws after not repealing Obamacare.
 
Back
Top