killed 50 from two blocks away from the 32nd floor....

domer76 said:
You poor, massively stupid toad. In 1900, many people still shit outside.

What the fuck did you think I meant about societies not being able to function without cars? 1789? lol

This is 2017, dimwit, and no civilized country can return to horse drawn wagons to deliver goods and services. Or to transport themselves to work, to school, to obtain food. Even a five year old understand that, but it's obviously out of your realm of comprehension.

How the fuck does someone as stupid as you even make it through the day? Do you pay someone to take care of you? It ain't enough. Have them review your drivel before you post. You'll humiliate yourself less.
Click to expand...

give your statements above, do you feel that there is a RIGHT to drive a vehicle then?
 
Corazón said:
What is a bump stock device, he apparently has two in the room.
Click to expand...

as USF explained, spot on correctly, that is exactly what the bump stock device is. IMO it's worse than a full auto. It takes an extraordinary amount of practice to get used to and even then, it's less accurate than a full auto.....which isn't accurate anyway.
 
Jarod said:
I hate these guns because they allow a whack job to kill 59 people in 10 min's from a block away and 32 stories up.
Click to expand...

and yet you want these weapons in the hands of government in case your political enemies do something you feel is too violent..........don't ya?
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Which has what to do with cars??
Or does it remind you of your inability to live in a fully functioning home?



Exactly what you said about cars being needed to have a functioning society, which lead to my comment regarding Henry Ford.
I thought that was self evident!!



Prove it. :D



And yet it is evidently causing you many problems.



Are you looking for hints, to help yourself?



The only one that appears to need help, is yourself; which is evident by your inability to maintain your ability to understand facts. :D
Click to expand...

You are just the cutest ignorant bitch, aren't you? Thinking I was referring to society of 100+ years ago. Just fucking priceless!
 
domer76 said:
Funny toad.

You keep proving the axiom "there's no such thing as a stupid question" wrong.
Click to expand...

so you like to make claims about rights because 'history' and 'current' society, but refuse to acknowledge inalienable rights, then refuse to back up those claims for some reason?????? and i'm the toad asking stupid questions??????
 
domer76 said:
You are just the cutest ignorant bitch, aren't you? Thinking I was referring to society of 100+ years ago. Just fucking priceless!
Click to expand...

Well; you weren't really specific, until the fallacy of your comment was pointed out. :D

Let me add; that you do back pedal and juggle, really well. :good4u:
 
SmarterthanYou said:
so you like to make claims about rights because 'history' and 'current' society, but refuse to acknowledge inalienable rights, then refuse to back up those claims for some reason?????? and i'm the toad asking stupid questions??????
Click to expand...

We've been down this road before, ignoramus.

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS AN INALIENABLE RIGHT.

You keep making the claim, yet cannot identify a single one.

Ask me again if driving a car is a right. I'm still laughing about the stupidity of the question.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Well; you weren't really specific, until the fallacy of your comment was pointed out. :D

Let me add; that you do back pedal and juggle, really well. :good4u:
Click to expand...

I needed to be specific about referencing today's society? REALLY? Why? So you wouldn't confuse me referencing life in 1827?

Holy shit! Can you really be that dense?
 
domer76 said:
I love getting under your collective skin so you continue to respond and humiliate yourselves. It's enjoyable.

BIG BUGS! Remember that one? A classic!
Click to expand...

If by "getting under" the collective skins, you mean that you amuse us with your continues stupidity; then you could be correct, because the only one who continually is humiliated is you. :D
 
domer76 said:
I needed to be specific about referencing today's society? REALLY? Why? So you wouldn't confuse me referencing life in 1827?

Holy shit! Can you really be that dense?
Click to expand...

You are the one who didn't specify, which you could have done by including the word "todays"; but you didn't, so it's just another fail to add to your growing count. :D
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
You are the one who didn't specify, which you could have done by including the word "todays"; but you didn't, so it's just another fail to add to your growing count. :D
Click to expand...

Jesus, you truly are USDUMBFUCK.

When I refer to "the President", do I have to specify Trump so that you're not confused that I might be referring to Rutherford B. Hayes?

LOL!
 
Thing1 said:
I still haven't heard how he got the weapons he used, and I know it's not cool to "politicize" tragedies like this right out of the gate, but this stuff does affect me on a pretty basic level.

I just don't get our gun culture. I don't get why organizations like the NRA have so much political power, and why they oppose measures like the banning assault weapons so fiercely.
Click to expand...

Because there's no such thing as an assault weapon, and fyi handguns kill more people than long guns.
 
domer76 said:
Jesus, you truly are USDUMBFUCK.

When I refer to "the President", do I have to specify Trump so that you're not confused that I might be referring to Rutherford B. Hayes?

LOL!
Click to expand...

That would depend on the conversation; because even past Presidents are referred to in such a manner.

Or didn't you know that?
 
Jarod said:
This whack job killed 50 people from two blocks away and from above down from the 32nd floor...


Can we all agree he should not have had access to a weapon capable causing this carnage?

I know the saying, guns don't kill people, but without access to such a weapon, he would never have been able to pull this off.
Click to expand...
How do propose to cut off the access?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top