John Stossel in hospital with cancer. Slams our horrible medical system

The USSR took profit out of farming and the country starved till they broke out their gold to import food.
Same thing happens with healthcare everywhere they try that nonsense.

No you fucking retard.
People have always starved to death in Russia.
Nice try though.
 
go get your proof that payroll is not a business cost you fucking brain dead cockroach dropping

Payroll is a business expense. It is not the same as profit. You don't understand what profit is and how businesses use it.

Your crack addled brain has been taught that it is evil and you have been taught to resent others who succeed
 
Because people will pay the last dime they own for treatment that will preserve their live and business will squeeze that maximum amount of profit from their pain and suffering because maximizing profits is what businesses do. There are ethics and morals above "supply vs. demand" economics with health care. Its more than just a business. It is life and death and wellness. That is why. It's not that maximizing profits is a bad thing in general but doing so at the cost of others disadvantage in pain and suffering is both immoral and unethical. That is why all modern industrialized nations, except the U.S., require their health care systems to operate as non-profits. That way the focus is on improving health outcomes, not maximizing profits, when those profits come at the cost of health outcomes.

It is also, in the long run, a more cost affective management model while improving over all health outcomes. In the U.S. we can't continue to waste nearly 20% of GDP on health care costs. It's far to great a slice of our economy and it is substantial hurdle to economic growth and productivity. Who do you think is driving health care reform in our nation? Government? Left wing liberals? Hell no it's corporations who are spending nearly 20% of their operational costs on health care for their employees.

What is the incentive for companies to spend hundreds of millions of dollars on new drug research if there is no profit potential on the back end?
 
What is the incentive for companies to spend hundreds of millions of dollars on new drug research if there is no profit potential on the back end?

How about helping their fellow man.

Doing right by their fellow human beings.

I realize how insane that concept must seem to those who worship the almighty dollar.
 
How about helping their fellow man.

Doing right by their fellow human beings.

I realize how insane that concept must seem to those who worship the almighty dollar.

This is just a softball for a snarky response but I'll refrain. What you're suggesting is this utopian vision of man that doesn't exist.
 
This is just a softball for a snarky response but I'll refrain. What you're suggesting is this utopian vision of man that doesn't exist.

Yeah, sadly, too many greedy bastards in this world. The incentives use to be help mankind, people who made discoveries in the medical field use to not make huge profits off other people's misery, times have changed.
 
Should I feel bad som young Doctors didn't do a bit of research regarding what working conditions were going to be like in their chosen profession BEFORE they began studying to become a Doctor.

They did. Overwork was not part of the plan. But the folks there are unhappy with lack of care so govt is trying to squeeze more out.
If they want more it's going to cost them. Perfect example of how profit motivates.
 
Yeah, sadly, too many greedy bastards in this world. The incentives use to be help mankind, people who made discoveries in the medical field use to not make huge profits off other people's misery, times have changed.

Was Hillary greedy when she asked for $600 to do a speech? Or was that just the free market?
 
Yeah, sadly, too many greedy bastards in this world. The incentives use to be help mankind, people who made discoveries in the medical field use to not make huge profits off other people's misery, times have changed.

Yes, they did make money. They spent a lot less of course so there wasn't so much to recoup. And testing was lessentially rigorous so we wound up with turpentine as a medicine and the Beyer people came up with heroin.
It's always been about making a buck.
 
Yes, they did make money. They spent a lot less of course so there wasn't so much to recoup. And testing was lessentially rigorous so we wound up with turpentine as a medicine and the Beyer people came up with heroin.
It's always been about making a buck.

No, I'm sorry, it hasn't. There were times when people made new discoveries in medicine to help mankind, not to make a profit.
 
Back
Top