Jews control the media. Ye is right. Here's the proof.

People generally wish to control what they own.

Purchase your own newspaper or television network and say whatever the hell you want.

You can even blog on the internet like a REAL asshole.
 
People generally wish to control what they own.

Purchase your own newspaper or television network and say whatever the hell you want.

You can even blog on the internet like a REAL asshole.

so if you buy all the media, you should be able to lie to everyone all the time.

COol.

nice theory, SLIC.
 
The term ' Soviet ' might give you a clue, dumpkin.

SOVIET =/= RUSSIA you goddamned motherfucking idiot.

What do you think "Soviet" means? It doesn't mean Russian at all.

There are three definitions of "Soviet":

1) ‘Council’, a congregation of persons gathered together to discuss some important matters.
2) ‘Advice’, a useful tip or instruction that can be taken or given.
3) ‘Concord’, a consent or agreement (this one is almost non-useable in contemporary Russian).

None of those definitions have anything to do with Russia.
 
Sure it's what happened.

No it isn't.


Crimeans were not consulted and there was no Presidium quorum for Kruschev's action to be legal under Russian law.

Because Crimea is a part of Ukraine, not Russia.

So you're complaining about something YOUR OWN PEOPLE DID that completely ruins your bullshit Putin argument today.


You don't know what the fuck you're saying.

No, YOU don't know what the fuck you're saying; you're just repeating Putin propaganda because you don't know any better.

Ukraine signed the UN charter in 1945 along with 50 other countries including the USSR and Belarus.

In 1991, Ukraine changed their name at the UN from the Soviet Socialist Republic of Ukraine to just Ukraine.

Soviet =/= Russia

Soviet means political council, not Russia.
 
Horseshit. You are dancing the semantic two-step.

No, you're just realizing that everything you've been saying here has been propaganda from Putin, and you're just too stupid to know any better.

You said it was "always Russian" but then you learned that it wasn't.

So ever since that moment, you've been doing posts like this, which might as well be white flags.
 
You're not even good at hogwash.

No, I'm good at history and you are not.

You didn't know many things about Ukraine, starting with the fact that they signed the UN charter as a sovereign nation in 1945, and weren't included with the USSR.

Then you said that Crimea was "always Russian" despite the fact that isn't fucking true at all.

Then you said that Kruschev was wrong by acknowledging that Crimea is a part of Ukraine...so one of your own leaders disagrees with your ahistorical assessment.

Ever since those revelations, you've been spinning your wheels and ignoring the inconvenient truths that scuttle any fake claims Putin has to Crimea.
 
You're the asshole that claims Russia is only thirty years old.

Yes, I was wrong about that.

Russia is actually only 28 years old because the Russian Federation Constitution was adopted on December 12th, 1993.

Again, these are easily searchable things on Google so there's no excuse for getting them wrong.
 
There was NO INDEPENDENT STATE OF UKRAINE UNTIL 1991.

Not in the eyes of the UN, which you helpfully pointed out for me here:

two Soviet Republics (Ukraine and Byelorussia) were admitted as full members of the United Nations

Full membership in the UN means sovereignty and it's precisely why the UN has condemned the Russian invasion and declared the Crimean referendum illegitimate.
 
Summary;

Crimea was Russian for centuries. Kruschev handed it to Ukraine- illegally and without consultation. Crimeans voted to rejoin Russia after the US-led Ukrainian coup of 2014.

Ukraine itself became an independent state only in 1991 after Gorbachev dissolved the USSR following the NATO promise not to advance eastward.
Ukraine was a Soviet satellite state in 1945 when the USSR was a founding UN member. The Russians negotiated with the US to allow full membership to Ukraine- as a Soviet republic.

Fin.

Wait - you said it was "always Russian", but that's not true.

So you moved the bar a bit to include Tsarist Russia, which ceased existing in 1918.

After the Tsar was killed, Russian Soviets invaded Ukraine in 1919 and annexed it in 1921. That annexation wasn't recognized by any international body at the time.

But then the Soviet Union dissolved in 1991, and a new Russian Federation was formed when the constitution was adopted in 1993. That Russian Federation included exactly ZERO former Soviet States.

So here's the thing...what claim is Putin laying to Ukraine that has to do with the Russian Federation, an entity that has only existed for 28 years?
 
SOVIET =/= RUSSIA you goddamned motherfucking idiot.

What do you think "Soviet" means? It doesn't mean Russian at all.

There are three definitions of "Soviet":

1) ‘Council’, a congregation of persons gathered together to discuss some important matters.
2) ‘Advice’, a useful tip or instruction that can be taken or given.
3) ‘Concord’, a consent or agreement (this one is almost non-useable in contemporary Russian).

None of those definitions have anything to do with Russia.

as globalism has nothing to do with being jewish.

globalismnoun

An ideology based on the belief that people, goods and information ought to be able to cross national borders unfettered.

globalismnoun

A socio-economic system dedicated to free trade and free access to markets.

Freebase(3.68 / 18 votes)Rate this definition:
Globalism

Globalism can have at least two different and opposing meanings. One meaning is the attitude or policy of placing the interests of the entire world above those of individual nations. Another is viewing the entire world as a proper sphere for one nation to project political influence. American political scientist Joseph Nye, co-founder of the international relations theory of neoliberalism, argues that globalism refers to any description and explanation of a world which is characterized by networks of connections that span multi-continental distances; while globalization refers to the increase or decline in the degree of globalism. In his 2005 book The Collapse of Globalism and the Reinvention of the World, Canadian philosopher John Ralston Saul argued that, far from being an inevitable force, globalization is already breaking up into contradictory pieces and that citizens are reasserting their national interests in both positive and destructive ways.

https://www.definitions.net/definition/globalism
 
as globalism has nothing to do with being jewish.

Well, the bad news for you is that it does and has been the case for at least 75 years, advanced by the loser Nazis and US Conservatives.

And you know that too because I've been telling you as much, so in your attempt to not be antisemitic, you end up being MORE antisemitic by trying to gaslight people.

Thing is, you're not clever enough to do that and you're an ignoramus.
 
Well, the bad news for you is that it does and has been the case for at least 75 years, advanced by the loser Nazis and US Conservatives.

And you know that too because I've been telling you as much, so in your attempt to not be antisemitic, you end up being MORE antisemitic by trying to gaslight people.

Thing is, you're not clever enough to do that and you're an ignoramus.

listen, boomerjew,

globalism has nothing to do with jews.

https://www.definitions.net/definition/globalism


globalismnoun

An ideology based on the belief that people, goods and information ought to be able to cross national borders unfettered.

globalismnoun

A socio-economic system dedicated to free trade and free access to markets.

Freebase(3.68 / 18 votes)Rate this definition:
Globalism

Globalism can have at least two different and opposing meanings. One meaning is the attitude or policy of placing the interests of the entire world above those of individual nations. Another is viewing the entire world as a proper sphere for one nation to project political influence. American political scientist Joseph Nye, co-founder of the international relations theory of neoliberalism, argues that globalism refers to any description and explanation of a world which is characterized by networks of connections that span multi-continental distances; while globalization refers to the increase or decline in the degree of globalism. In his 2005 book The Collapse of Globalism and the Reinvention of the World, Canadian philosopher John Ralston Saul argued that, far from being an inevitable force, globalization is already breaking up into contradictory pieces and that citizens are reasserting their national interests in both positive and destructive ways.
 
No, I'm good at history and you are not.

You didn't know many things about Ukraine, starting with the fact that they signed the UN charter as a sovereign nation in 1945, and weren't included with the USSR.

Then you said that Crimea was "always Russian" despite the fact that isn't fucking true at all.

Then you said that Kruschev was wrong by acknowledging that Crimea is a part of Ukraine...so one of your own leaders disagrees with your ahistorical assessment.

Ever since those revelations, you've been spinning your wheels and ignoring the inconvenient truths that scuttle any fake claims Putin has to Crimea.

your whole argument is based on you getting to rewrite history.

Why do you jews do that?
 
No it isn't.




Because Crimea is a part of Ukraine, not Russia.

Crimea was Russian. Kruschev illegally signed it to Ukraine. The Crimeans voted it back. Crimea is Russian.

Suck it up-- or go invade it.

So you're complaining about something YOUR OWN PEOPLE DID that completely ruins your bullshit Putin argument today.

I'm not ' complaining ', dumbass. I'm an observer .


No, YOU don't know what the fuck you're saying; you're just repeating Putin propaganda because you don't know any better.

Ukraine signed the UN charter in 1945 along with 50 other countries including the USSR and Belarus.

In 1991, Ukraine changed their name at the UN from the Soviet Socialist Republic of Ukraine to just Ukraine.

Soviet =/= Russia

Soviet means political council, not Russia.

This crap was debunked earlier. You're just treading shit.

No, you're just realizing that everything you've been saying here has been propaganda from Putin, and you're just too stupid to know any better.

You said it was "always Russian" but then you learned that it wasn't.

So ever since that moment, you've been doing posts like this, which might as well be white flags.

I've demonstrated that Crimea has been Russian for hundreds of years. You are sounding like a spoiled nutjob. Zionist ?

Haw, haw............................haw.
















No, I'm good at history and you are not.

You might well be- but it's a fabricated history that reality doesn't agree with.

You didn't know many things about Ukraine, starting with the fact that they signed the UN charter as a sovereign nation in 1945, and weren't included with the USSR.

Then you said that Crimea was "always Russian" despite the fact that isn't fucking true at all.

Then you said that Kruschev was wrong by acknowledging that Crimea is a part of Ukraine...so one of your own leaders disagrees with your ahistorical assessment.

Ever since those revelations, you've been spinning your wheels and ignoring the inconvenient truths that scuttle any fake claims Putin has to Crimea.

History tells us- well, the intelligent among us anyway- that Russia negotiated for Ukraine to become a full UN member as a Soviet Republic ( RUSSIAN ) Ukraine didn't become independent until 1991. Them's the facts, dumbass- irrespective of you being ' good at history '

Haw, haw...................haw.


Yes, I was wrong about that.

Russia is actually only 28 years old because the Russian Federation Constitution was adopted on December 12th, 1993.

Sure, the Russian Revolution never happened .

Haw, haw........................haw.

Give it up, dumbass. Quit clowning.

Again, these are easily searchable things on Google so there's no excuse for getting them wrong.

Agreed. I always double-check my sources though. Sometimes sicko Zionists lay false trails in Wiki until the editors ban them. You've probably tried it yourself.




Not in the eyes of the UN, which you helpfully pointed out for me here:

Full membership in the UN means sovereignty and it's precisely why the UN has condemned the Russian invasion and declared the Crimean referendum illegitimate.

Certainly- but ' sovereignty ' has qualifiers. Ukraine, for example, was admitted to the UN as a Soviet Republic - as I've told you four times already.

Wait - you said it was "always Russian", but that's not true.

Always Russian as far as Ukraine is concerned- as there wasn't an independent Ukraine until 1991.

So you moved the bar a bit to include Tsarist Russia, which ceased existing in 1918.

Not me, dumbass. It's you that thinks Russia is only 28.

Haw, haw..............................haw.

After the Tsar was killed, Russian Soviets invaded Ukraine in 1919 and annexed it in 1921. That annexation wasn't recognized by any international body at the time.

But then the Soviet Union dissolved in 1991, and a new Russian Federation was formed when the constitution was adopted in 1993. That Russian Federation included exactly ZERO former Soviet States.

So here's the thing...what claim is Putin laying to Ukraine that has to do with the Russian Federation, an entity that has only existed for 28 years?

Well, the bad news for you is that it does and has been the case for at least 75 years, advanced by the loser Nazis and US Conservatives.

And you know that too because I've been telling you as much, so in your attempt to not be antisemitic, you end up being MORE antisemitic by trying to gaslight people.

Thing is, you're not clever enough to do that and you're an ignoramus.

Thanks to observers such as myself, dumbass, the Zionists, such as you, who would like carte blanche to lie through the media , have hit the buffers.

You can stfu up now. You've surely exhausted your stupidity.
 
A fascinating new documentary shows how antisemitic lies were the ‘original fake news’
‘The Conspiracy’ director Maxim Pozdorovkin on why the myth of Jewish control is so durable

At the beginning of the 19th century, the Oldest Hatred added a new innovation.

Amid the aftershocks of the French Revolution, many Jews gained civil rights, and with the anxiety of a liberalizing Europe, accounts began to spread of secret meetings in the Old Jewish Cemetery in Prague. An influential letter claimed that the “Hebrew sect” was controlling the Jacobins and Freemasons. Jews, once marginalized and vilified on theological grounds, were, with emancipation, held up as master manipulators.

Within a generation or two of their new freedoms, three Jewish families with nothing in common would be implicated in the alleged conspiracy, and, soon after, countless more would be murdered in its name. The libel is still with us, and shows no signs of abating.

“Antisemitism’s about a bad idea — an intellectually stupid idea that’s also a toxic lethal idea that’s been disastrous” said Russian-American director Maxim Pozdorovkin, whose new animated documentary, “The Conspiracy,” chronicles the development of canards about secret Jewish control.

If you look at any conspiracy theory, the central predicate of all of them is that there’s a secret group that’s basically hiding the truth, and then manufacturing through various layers of complexity, an alternative truth that the rubes believe. It’s kind of remarkable if you think about it. In some cases, it’s plausible. In other cases it’s just borderline idiotic to even think that any kind of planning on that scale could ever take place.

https://forward.com/culture/524748/...axim-pozdorovkin-liev-schreiber-mayim-bialik/
 
A fascinating new documentary shows how antisemitic lies were the ‘original fake news’


How about ' A land without a people for a people without a land '

th



Haw, haw................................haw.
 
Back
Top