Is Trump being baited, again?

Jarod said:
Ken Star got approval from Janet Reno along the way to expand his scope. I think its funny how they started with financial crimes and ended with a sex scandal, but thats how it went. Republican all supported it.

Mueller has gotten approval for expansions from Rump appointee Rob Rosenstein.
Click to expand...
Rosenweasel is an enabler.
I'm not a Republican I'm a Constitutional populist.
I hate both partys equally for their trampling of enumerated powers, demise of federalism etc.

Mueller is a fabrication of DC. Congress got rid of special prosecutors for just these reasons
 
anatta said:
Roseweasel is an enabler.
I'm not a Republican,I'm a Constitional populist. I hate both partys equally for their tramping of enumerated powers, demise of federalism etc.

Mueller is a fabrication of DC. Congress got rid of special prosecutors for just these reasons
Click to expand...

Why has Mueller done beyond his scope?
 
anatta said:
no probable cause for Mueller's investigation, no crime alleged.
That means it's a speculative criminal investigation without foundation = "general dwarrant"
Click to expand...

A judge said there was PC? A crime does not have to be alleged to have an investigation.
 
Jarod said:
A judge said there was PC? A crime does not have to be alleged to have an investigation.
Click to expand...
a criminal investigation by a prosecutor -
as opposed to routine law enforcement investigatory practices where there is no proof of crimes; needs probable cause
 
anatta said:
a criminal investigation by a prosecutor -
as opposed to routine law enforcement investigatory practices where there is no proof of crimes; needs probable cause
Click to expand...

1) cite?

A judge found PC!

Actually several judges did.
 
noise said:
cite what? my knowledge of the Constitution?
where do you see any PC listed for the Mueller investigation? you don't
Click to expand...

1) what part of the constitution says what you claim?

2) I have not seen the PC, you have not either, but judges clearly have. Do you understand how a search warrant is issued?
 
Jarod said:
1) what part of the constitution says what you clean?

2) I have not seen the PC, you have not either, but judges clearly have. Do you understand how a search warrant is issued?
Click to expand...
I'm talking about MUELLER , not Cohen..Cohen OBVIOUSLY has a PC against him to grant the search warrant.

The 4th Amendment lays out the criteria for a warrant..why are you being so obtuse?

Nevrmind -you are a waste of time
 
noise said:
I'm talking about MUELLER , not Cohen..Cohen OBVIOUSLY has a PC against him to grant the search warrant.

The 4th Amendment lays out the criteria for a warrant..why are you being so obtuse?

Nevrmind -you are a waste of time
Click to expand...

Where does the 4th say you can’t investigate without pc?
 
Jarod said:
Why has Mueller done beyond his scope?
Click to expand...

Because collusion was a farce—and they probably knew it from the outset.

The goal is to impeach Trump, so limiting the investigation to collusion runs the risk of Mueller coming up empty. That wouldn’t do, so Rosenweasel wrote the mandate broad enough that it’s effectively a general warrant. Mueller goes where Mueller wants to.

Did I miss anything?
 
Darth Omar said:
Because collusion was a farce—and they probably knew it from the outset.

The goal is to impeach Trump, so limiting the investigation to collusion runs the risk of Mueller coming up empty. That wouldn’t do, so Rosenweasel wrote the mandate broad enough that it’s effectively a general warrant. Mueller goes where Mueller wants to.

Did I miss anything?
Click to expand...

1) you don’t know what they have re collusion.
2) so what if there is none, that means they have to ignore other crimes?

What was your position on the Clinton impeachment.
 
There is NO constitutional prohibition against the feds investigating anything for any or no reason!
 
anatta said:
There's nothing fair about a virulently partisan team of investigators and prosecutors seeking to destroy the presidency of their political opponent based upon trumped-up charges paid for by the politician they wanted to win.
Click to expand...


Are you saying that Mueller and his team of partisans are being paid by Hillary to get Trump?

If not that, then what?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top