While I agree having children starve to death is worse, kids who are mal-nutritioned have trouble focusing on school; they can't learn as well; in the long run they have fewer opportunities. They also suffer health-wise, including obesity and diabetes. (I know, ironic that mal-nutritioned kids get obesity, but cheap food is often high calorie food)
And then there are kids who live in places that still have lead in the paint... there was an appalling study done at some point in the last 10 years - they did a study of kids in houses/apts where the lead had been removed vs those who stayed in lead-infested places; after just something like 6 months, they noticed differences in intelligence. The appalling part is they didn't tell the parents of the kids with lead poisoning that their kids had it; they kept checking up on the kids, but never told the parents so the parents could get their kids out of those places. The parents, since the doctors were checking the kids regularly, didn't know there was a problem since the doctors never mentioned it...
You think a state like Texas or Mississippi is going to put in place its own minimum wage? In practice, leaving it up to the states means no minimum wage in the states with high poverty levels.
But you've said that the problem is that these people lack skills. I don't see how more low-paying jobs that require no skills is a solution to a poverty problem, unless, of course, you require higher wages through -- and I'm just stabbing wildly in the dark here -- a minimum wage or something.
She didn't lie, give it a rest. You are such a spinner.
No idea who the "she" was you thought was lying. I haven't noticed any females telling lies in this thread; I certainly haven't.
its and old con trick.
call someone a liar even when they have never lied.
the ole repeat until people think is must be true
It doesn't matter, at least they aren't starving to death, you aren't really bad off unless you have at least one child starve to death, then that is REAL poverty. The poverty experienced in the USA is not real poverty, it is just bad luck.
I agree, a very big heart.
While I agree having children starve to death is worse, kids who are mal-nutritioned have trouble focusing on school; they can't learn as well; in the long run they have fewer opportunities. They also suffer health-wise, including obesity and diabetes. (I know, ironic that mal-nutritioned kids get obesity, but cheap food is often high calorie food)
The she is Desh... and she most certainly has lied.
Who are these people that you think depend on minimum wage to pay bills? You have acknowledged half are teens/college kids. You know from the stats that many of the others work in jobs that rely upon tips in addition to the minimum wage they receive.
You continue to ignore the fact that when you raise labor costs the prices of goods and services tends to escalate as well.
Actually you can also become obese by eating too few calories.
You do realize it is DESH that stated poverty = starving babies??? It is DESH that insisted it was so? That it was myself that told her poverty did not equate to starvation?
Yeah... I didn't think you did.
LMAO... pure irony... you continue to lie about my position on the Citi thread Desh. I have pointed it out. You have continued to maintain that I said something other than that which I said. In other words, you are lying about my position.
You then lied on this thread about my position again.
Yes, I think they will. You are of the mindset that things only happen if the Federal government is involved. Which is not shocking given that is your MO. What is your basis for proclaiming they won't have a minimum wage?
Where is it that I said we should have more low-paying jobs? Oh, thats right... I didn't. Have fun knocking your straw man around.
Seriously? Are you familiar at all with these states and their governments?
Well, you said we need more jobs, which is true. But I don't see how it's possible for people who lack skills (which you've already said is the primary problem) to get high paying jobs. Maybe you can explain how the invisible hand will magically create high paying jobs for low skill workers.
This is such BULLSHIT Simplefreak.
Those who are compensated with tips enjoy a MUCH lower minimum pay rate; $2.30 /hour if I remember correctly.
To insinuate that those paid the federal minimum are likely to be tipped is complete cock and bull, so typical of your every utterance.
Further, to indicate that most who are paid only minimum wage are not heads of households or single parents exacerbates your dishonesty to a truly disgusting level.
You are basically a decent fellow, why must you stick with the (obviously) incorrect party line on this most important issue?
You are a twister and a spinner, and everyone here who is not a stone cold con knows it, so I don't know who you think you are kidding, but nobody of any importance here thinks Desh lied.
By the way, check out this map of states with no minimum wage laws or minimum wages lower than the federal minimum wage:
![]()
To this map of poverty levels in the states:
![]()
Seriously? Are you familiar at all with these states and their governments?
Well, you said we need more jobs, which is true. But I don't see how it's possible for people who lack skills (which you've already said is the primary problem) to get high paying jobs. Maybe you can explain how the invisible hand will magically create high paying jobs for low skill workers.