If the Senate allows a fair trial...

Definitely part of a long drawn-out extortion attempt...that is easy for anyone to see, except those who Trump suggested would not be bothered if he shot someone on Fifth Avenue.

Zelensky was elected on May 25, 2019, just two days after the "aid" investigation into the Poroshenko gov't corruption closed, Frank. :palm:

Trump was joking. :palm:
 
The Democrats were talking impeachment before President Trump took office.

Before the failed “Russian collusion” and “the Ukraine” scam.

And the WB lawyer ‘just happened to be’ a big cheerleader for Trump’s ultimate impeachment.

See my sig.
 
Definitely part of a long drawn-out extortion attempt...that is easy for anyone to see, except those who Trump suggested would not be bothered if he shot someone on Fifth Avenue.

Extortion requires a threat. Quote the threat made in the phone call, Frank. I'd like to see what has you so bent.

I've already provided the relevant portion and a link to the whole transcript for you.
 
Hello Celticguy,

Yes, they did. Its sad that your team refuses to acknowledge this.

It is sad that Trump Fans refuse to acknowledge that he lost the popular vote, and that he is a very unpopular President with detestable notions.

Honestly. You ram this distasteful President down our throats and expect us not to gag?

What is this? A tall ship of his majesty's navy in the 1800's? Are we next to be flogged for speaking our minds?

We have life far better than that and we are not standing idly by whilst you trash it nor allow the planet to be destroyed by the effects of industrialization.

We shall take control and we shall right these wrongs for the good of humankind. And we shall not be deterred from our noble quest. Period.
 
"There's a lot of. talk about Biden's son,. that Biden stopped the
prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so
whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great.
Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if
you ·can look into it ... It sounds horrible to me."


https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Unclassified09.2019.pdf

"if you can look into it "

Certainly NOT a demand. :palm:

Definitely NOT extortion.
 
Hello Darth,

First off, how is Trump ‘rigging anything’ lol?

He tried to dig up false dirt on a political rival by withholding approved assistance to a foreign ally in order to force an announcement of a bogus investigation.

He didn’t rig anything with Putin and he didn’t rig anything in Ukraine. And even if he was a rigger what was the point of kinda sorta impeaching him? It’s not going to stop what ever rigging you think he might do in the future.

Makes no absolutely no sense.

Oh it will make perfect sense when Trump loses executive privilege, faces justice and is convicted.

And you can’t just wave off Zelensky like his words don’t matter. He said he felt no pressure from Trump. Apparently, he felt compelled to say it *again* because some people weren’t getting the point. This is one of the things that will change in a Senate trial if/when Nancy decides to fulfill the impeachment process as defined *in the constitution*. Republicans are going to use Zelensky’s testimony as exculpatory evidence and I can’t imagine Chief Justice Roberts being the first judge in US history to disallow the alleged victim’s testimony in a trial.

If this trial occurs it’s not going to be anything like Schiff’s Star Chamber. Maybe that’s why Nancy is dragging her feet.

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God."
 
Zelensky was elected on May 25, 2019, just two days after the "aid" investigation into the Poroshenko gov't corruption closed, Frank. :palm:

Trump was joking. :palm:

The only people who think Trump was "joking"...are the people Trump was referencing when he said he could shoot someone on Fifth Avenue and not lose a vote!

You want to pretend the entire case for the extortion attempt must be predicated on what was said in that phone call. But the testimony given indicates that the extortion attempt was an on-going thing. The fact that right after Trump asked for a "favor, though"...Zelensky talked about "that investigation" and gave a promise about it.

No problem, though. I understand you are committed to the Dear Leader.

Go with it in peace.

I will continue to oppose it with every cell in my body...because Trump is as bad for America as Hitler was for Germany.
 
Extortion requires a threat. Quote the threat made in the phone call, Frank. I'd like to see what has you so bent.

Oh, you expected a threat to be made in a phone call being listened in on by dozens of people from both sides?

Oh, my goodness. How does one deal with naivete' of this sort?


I've already provided the relevant portion and a link to the whole transcript for you.

I've read the transcript. I just am not naive enough to think that is the way extorters work.

Troubles me that you are.
 
"There's a lot of. talk about Biden's son,. that Biden stopped the
prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so
whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great.
Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if
you ·can look into it ... It sounds horrible to me."


https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Unclassified09.2019.pdf

"if you can look into it "

Certainly NOT a demand. :palm:

Definitely NOT extortion.

Absolutely part of an extortion attempt.

And to think, Trump was right that people would back him up in his duplicity.
 
Absolutely part of an extortion attempt.

And to think, Trump was right that people would back him up in his duplicity.

Thanks, but I'll stick with the facts, not Sondland's presumptions, yours or anyone else's.

:palm:
 
Has it even occurred to you that Zelensky is telling the truth lol?

I would think he wouldn’t think too highly of Democrats. And what is Justice Roberts supposed to do in a Senate trial when democrats object to republicans entering Zelensky’s testimony as exculpatory evidence?

Discount it? On what basis? Because Democrats *speculate* that Zelensky is like a battered wife that’s afraid to speak up lol?

I think we both know what Roberts would do, Frank. Do yourself a favor and back away from this. You can still think Trump is Hitler without getting sucked into this absurdity.

Has it occurred to you that trump is lying? His record over the last three years shows a high probability that he is.
 
I understand.

It is required of you.

Joe Biden threatened to withhold a billion dollars, if one prosecutor was not fired. That is extortion and that is a fact.

You have admitted that you can not produce a threat made by President Trump in the phone call. Your excuse is it's because extortion doesn't work that way. Wrong, that is exactly how extortion works. :palm: Just ask Joe! He's an expert at it.
 
Hello Celticguy,

It is sad that Trump Fans refuse to acknowledge that he lost the popular vote, and that he is a very unpopular President with detestable notions.

Honestly. You ram this distasteful President down our throats and expect us not to gag?

What is this? A tall ship of his majesty's navy in the 1800's? Are we next to be flogged for speaking our minds?

We have life far better than that and we are not standing idly by whilst you trash it nor allow the planet to be destroyed by the effects of industrialization.

We shall take control and we shall right these wrongs for the good of humankind. And we shall not be deterred from our noble quest. Period.

:hand::hand::hand::hand: Dems candidates should use this as their campaign slogan. It should be printed on t-shirts and banners. You should trademark it!

May I use it in my sig?
 
Last edited:
Oh, you expected a threat to be made in a phone call being listened in on by dozens of people from both sides?

Oh, my goodness. How does one deal with naivete' of this sort?




I've read the transcript. I just am not naive enough to think that is the way extorters work.

Troubles me that you are.

Well Frank, were you naive enough to think Trump would ask Putin to release Hillary’s emails on national TV lol?
 
Joe Biden threatened to withhold a billion dollars, if one prosecutor was not fired. That is extortion and that is a fact.

You have admitted that you can not produce a threat made by President Trump in the phone call. Your excuse is it's because extortion doesn't work that way. Wrong, that is exactly how extortion works. :palm: Just ask Joe! He's an expert at it.

C'mon, Dog.

He doesn't expect you to work this hard for him

I enjoy your determination, though.

He's going to disappoint you big time!
 
Well Frank, were you naive enough to think Trump would ask Putin to release Hillary’s emails on national TV lol?

I try not to do any expecting when Trump is involved.

Have I mentioned that I consider him to be an unintelligent, classless boor?

If not...I consider Trump to be an unintelligent, classless boor.
 
Oh, you expected a threat to be made in a phone call being listened in on by dozens of people from both sides?


You are the one claiming that an obvious threat was made in the phone call A phone call that Trump ordered to be transcribed and had a dozen listeners. :dunno:

That threat is only obvious to you and leftist partisans, Frank. It's not extortion if there is no threat or use of force. That's a fact, Frank.
 
C'mon, Dog.

He doesn't expect you to work this hard for him

I enjoy your determination, though.

He's going to disappoint you big time!

Yes, Frank, you have lost the argument.

As to your capitulatory deflection, he has already far exceeded my expectations, thanks.
 
Back
Top