If the Senate allows a fair trial...

[Bigdog]

You have noone boxed in. A dozen witnesses all say the same thing and all of them more credible than trump. Even you know the fucker is guilty and simply don't want to admit it.

Frank Apisa claims there was no obvious threat in the phone call. Vindman testified there is.

Your argument is with Frank, not me.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

lol..another impeachment would make the Dems look like a laughingstock, because it STILL won't be a crime

The anti-Brexits, American version.

 

[Into the Night]

Holiday Cheer Anatta,



It is a violation of the Constitution.

Please specify exactly where. Be specific.

Thus, he broke his oath. That may not be defined as a specific crime, so it falls under the generalized 'High Crimes' description, which is basically anything the House says it is.

The House does not get to make up a law by itself! See Articles I, II, and III of the U.S. Constitution.

 

[Into the Night]

Only a dumbfuck brownshirt would not get it.

Don't own any brown shirts.

 

[Into the Night]

vague assertions are not impeachable.
The Article are written as charges/ the impeachment text of the Constitution does not allow for Abuse of Power
-only crimes

Define 'abuse of power'.