If God were real, you wouldn’t need a book

Yep.

I did, that's why I'm calling you out on your lies.

God allowed Pharaoh to kill children and THEN killed children himself. Period. Your spin doesn't change the fact that those things happened.

And?
this is why Christians go with jesus's golden rule, a vast improvement over the racist tribal demiurge.
 
Bu...bu.....but Doctor Dutch, I don't want to be a lab rat.
ahonax.jpg
Suck it up, Sybil. I promise it won't hurt much. :thup:
 
[
Cosmology is not a branch of science!!
Yes it is, dummy.
Cosmology is not physics!
Cosmologists are routinely awarded the Nobel Prize in physics because their science is a branch of physics.
He is not introducing anything mystical, paranormal, or transcendental!
Your Bible thumping friends got annoyed when I said every physics and cosmology class I've ever taken discusses the universe almost exclusively in terms of matter, energy, and spacetime.

Since matter, energy, and spacetime annoyed them so much, they were obviously contemplating introducing the mystical, the paranormal, the transcendental, the existential into American science education.
 
I didn't spin anything. Go read the Bible.
I have. That's how I know what Pharaoh did.

It's also clear that you haven't.

I also have a sense of right and wrong and an understanding of what is/isn't moral, which is why I can accurately call your God a homicidal socio/psychopath.

If you believe I'm wrong, then tell me what you would do in that situation. If you were God AND you decided to intervene in a situation where a world leader planned to kill innocent children, would you allow that leader to do it and then go kill innocent children yourself or would you do what any rational person would do and stop the killing of ALL innocent children involved?
 
Last edited:
Yes it is, dummy.
Cosmology is not a branch of science. It is a religion.
Cosmologists are routinely awarded the Nobel Prize in physics because their science is a branch of physics.
Science is not a prize.
Your Bible thumping friends got annoyed when I said every physics and cosmology class I've ever taken discusses the universe almost exclusively in terms of matter, energy, and spacetime.
I don't thump Bibles. I don't know anyone that does.
Science is not religion.
Since matter, energy, and spacetime annoyed them so much, they were obviously contemplating introducing the mystical, the paranormal, the transcendental, the existential into American science education.
Buzzword fallacy. Omniscience fallacy.
 
I have. That's how I know what Pharaoh did.
But you don't.
It's also clear that you haven't.
LIF. Grow up.
I also have a sense of right and wrong and an understanding of what is/isn't moral, which is why I can accurately call your God a homicidal socio/psychopath.
Then you have no sense at all.
If you believe I'm wrong, then tell me what you would do in that situation. If you were God AND you decided to intervene in a situation where a world leader planned to kill innocent children, would you allow that leader to do it and then go kill innocent children yourself or would you do what any rational person would do and stop the killing of ALL innocent children involved?
Whataboutism. I am not God. I didn't create Egypt or the Pharaoh.
 
If you believe I'm wrong, then tell me what you would do in that situation. If you were God AND you decided to intervene in a situation where a world leader planned to kill innocent children, would you allow that leader to do it and then go kill innocent children yourself or would you do what any rational person would do and stop the killing of ALL innocent children involved?
Whataboutism

Exactly the kind of non-response response I'd expect from you.

No biggie. If I had structured my life around fairytales about a homicidal psychopath, I wouldn't want to admit it either.
 
Never know. You might decide to be honest at some point.
Now you claim you didn't ask. Whadda loser.
I was asking a question that you couldn't answer with exposing your God as a psychopath and anything but an objective source for morality.
No, you were building an attempted proof by contrivance. That's a fallacy, dude.
Incoherent babbling.
Okay. You withdraw your statement, since you think it's incoherent babbling.
 
I also have a sense of right and wrong and an understanding of what is/isn't moral,
Again, you are smuggling in and invoking an absolute standard of right and wrong.

Where are you getting this absolute objective standard of right and wrong? If nothing exists but matter and energy, you are deluding yourself. There is no absolute moral truth. An absolute standard of right and wrong doesn't exist, it's all just a matter of opinion, whim, social convention.
 
Back
Top