If God were real, you wouldn’t need a book

[Into the Night]

morality is a set of behaviors and attitudes that facilitate voluntary, cooperative, and mutually beneficial relationships.

Redefinition fallacy.

of course, tyrants hate every aspect of this.

Even tyrants have a morality of their own.

Go learn what 'morality' means.

 

[Into the Night]

So you admit to being in a position you cannot say what the Nazis did was objectively wrong by a universal standard of absolute right and wrong.

There is no 'objectively wrong'. There is just 'wrong' and 'right', defined by morals.
To you (I assume from your post), and to me, what the Nazis did was wrong.

To the Nazis, what they did was right.

There is no such thing as a 'universal standard of absolute write and wrong'.

And you are in no position to say ritual human sacrifice or female genital mutilation are really and truly wrong because they are social conventions of those cultures.

You don't get to dictate everything to everyone. You are not the king. You are not lord of the Earth. Omniscience fallacy.

Those cultures are what they are. To them, it's right. To you and me, it's wrong.

 

[Into the Night]

MAGAts loooove Nazis. They are weak both morally and physically thus requiring a Daddy to protect them.

Nazi fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

you nailed into the night. thank you.

Don't think so. Like you, he figures there is something called an 'absolute morality' which he can dictate at will.

but can you say murdering Gaza babies is wrong?

It quite literally depends on who you ask, and the context you ask it in.

 

[Into the Night]

I disagree, but that's a separate topic.

Absolutely not.

Yes. Lots of immoral behaviors were acceptable, and endorsed by the Bible/God, thousands of years ago. Man, who wrote the Bible and was the determiner of right/wrong and moral/immoral, was far more barbaric and far less civilized in OT times and less barbaric in NT times, which is why God changed his mind about what was moral/immoral in the NT.

He didn't.

Maybe. Maybe not. Someone(s) had ronstaet the conversation that questioned certain behaviors. It could have been me!

Yes. Morality has improve from OT to NT and continues to improve today, though ,even among Christians, there is disagreement because some are slower to adjust because some want to hold on to the barbaric morality of their God's book longer than others.

What is barbaric about the gospel of God and Jesus Christ?

 

[Into the Night]

I disagree, but that's a separate topic.

Absolutely not.

Yes. Lots of immoral behaviors were acceptable, and endorsed by the Bible/God, thousands of years ago. Man, who wrote the Bible and was the determiner of right/wrong and moral/immoral, was far more barbaric and far less civilized in OT times and less barbaric in NT times, which is why God changed his mind about what was moral/immoral in the NT.

You don't get to dictate everything for everyone. You are not the king. Omniscience fallacy.

Maybe. Maybe not. Someone(s) had ronstaet the conversation that questioned certain behaviors. It could have been me!

Yes. Morality has improve from OT to NT and continues to improve today, though ,even among Christians, there is disagreement because some are slower to adjust because some want to hold on to the barbaric morality of their God's book longer than others.

Morality is not an 'improvement'. It simply exists.
The gospel of God and Jesus Christ has not changed.

 

[Into the Night]

Atheism is the religion of communism,

Redefinition fallacy. Atheism is not a religion.

as proved by both Joseph Stalin and Mao Zedong.

Name dropping is not a proof.

They murdered millions of innocent people in the name of an atheist state.

No, they simply murdered millions of people. The Church of State as God is not atheism. It is tyranny.