Airstrip One
Completely Effed
Abiogenesis explains how you get building blocks......unfortunately for your argument, that is its end point......it gives you nothing about how the blocks turn into a building
That's my point.
Abiogenesis explains how you get building blocks......unfortunately for your argument, that is its end point......it gives you nothing about how the blocks turn into a building
No one has claimed is does except you.
DNA does not code itself is the simple answer.
Really? Show me those claims.
Hasn't that always been the way though? Whenever we hadn't yet understood something, we'd insert a deity.
I know, right?.....That's been discussed extensively. There isn't any evidence
What about a virus?
That's my point.
My point is you don't understand protein synthesis. Do you know there are vast numbers of microorganisms that contain no functional proteins. Many prokaryotes, archaea, contain no ribosomes and do not produce functional proteins? They certainly predate bacteria and eukaryotes. They are composed mainly of water, phospholipids and carbohydrates all of which can be produced by organic chemical reactions.I thought we were talking about abiogenesis---that's well before protein synthesis.
With abiogenesis, at some point or other, functional proteins had to form---without protein synthesis. PS is a biochemical system, which itself, relies on scores if not hundreds of proteins in the ribosome and etc.
My point is that probabilities have much to do the problem. You tried to dismiss it via a straw man fallacy.
How did a living thing manage to have nondefective DNA and survive in the first place.....
Are you saying viruses are not alive? LOLI said alive.....
Well than back it up. You appear to be the one running away.pure bullshit......
run from the question of origin, see if anyone cares.....
Are you saying viruses are not alive? LOL
And yet, it only happened one time, and never again. What are the odds?
It threatens any theistic worldview that says god populated the world with present day forms with the snap of his noodle appendages, like the Bible says happened in a single day. If your religion is scant on any details then it is not threatened.

you have evidence of a twice?......don't get me wrong.....I think God repeated the process lots of times, but that generally isn't a thing shared by non believers.....
???....no threat to my theistic worldview what so ever.......God created creatures capable of evolving.......many different creatures capable of evolving into many other creatures capable of evolving.....
I'm very comfortable pointing out that a first cause is illogical if you apply cause and effect to everything as part of your logic. It makes no sense to carve out a giant exception, conveniently for a deity creator to occupy. Who or what caused the creator? If he always existed there is no first cause. I'm more comfortable with that paradox than one where a God that did not exist making himself exist, without having been "caused."
Of course you can always claim he is outside cause effect, space/time or any other inconvenient aspect of observed reality.
God is going to lose any science debate, he can only survive lurking in recesses of philosophy or church.
I'm not sure I understand your question.
Most creatures have the ability to survive, through breathing, eating, etc; but those with a defect in their coding, may develop a condition that shortens their lifespan.
Are you saying viruses are not alive? LOL
http://scienceline.ucsb.edu/getkey.php?key=3316Viruses are not classified as being alive because they don’t have their own machinery for reproducing. They can only take over the machinery of cells, turning them into virus factories.
Hasn't that always been the way though? Whenever we hadn't yet understood something, we'd insert a deity. We used to think the sun was a god, because we couldn't explain it.