‘I Voted for Barack Because He Was Black’

When I was in high school a popular shirt that black kids wore said 'It's A Black Thing, You Wouldn't Understand' in red, black and green colors. There was never really an issue made about it. I never saw a shirt that subsituted white for black but I'm pretty sure that would not go over the same.

Whites have been the dominant racial group in America. Therefore minority groups (and especially blacks) can wear shirts like above or make comments like Samuel Jackson and it will have a different meaning than if a white person does it. Or U.S. History is basically white history and that's why we have a Black History Month.

Each person can determine how they feel about that but I think that is the explanation for why things are the way they are.

I remember that shirt/slogan. And you're right - it wouldn't go over the same if a white person wore it, with "white" substituted.

That's because the black experience in America has been a whole different animal. People are still alive who had to drink out of different fountains, and sit in the back of the bus. "Equal opportunity" had no meaning in the black community. And a black guy getting elected President? That would have been laughable just a few decades ago.

That's why I get it when Sam Jackson said he voted for a guy just because he's black, and indicated that all other things are basically equal in the choice because everyone at that level is "just a politician." I can understand why it would be issue #1 for someone just to see that barrier broken.
 
Does misusing the term "racism" make you feel more intelligent?

Is it racism if I thought that all black people voted for Barack because he "looked like them"? Is it racism if I thought that all whites voted for all the previous Presidents because they "looked like them"?

The racism isn't in the vote, it is in the negative stereotype that is associated with others through both ignorance and assumption. There may indeed be some people who voted for McCain "because" he was white, but they are extremely rare and it is certainly not well evidenced by the past Presidencies. Had zillions of whites voted against Obama that otherwise would normally vote Democrat you may have some evidence of this, but the idea that those who would normally vote for a republican due to policy disagreements with Democrats voted for McCain because he "looked like them" is ignorant pap. Trying to support it with such vehemence is oddly intriguing. Why do you want it to be true so much?

Emulating racists that would vote for "the guy that looks like them" is not something of which I would be proud. Assuming that everybody of a certain pigment have in the past is a gross assumption, clearly and flatly shown to be wrong by the fact that nobody crossed party lines to vote against Obama due to the fact that McCain "looked like them"...
 
Actually, it does. It's not racism. You obviously are clueless about the definition and its' tenets.

My dictionary says, RACISM:

"discrimination on the basis of race".....

And to help you further,

DISCRIMINATION :

Treatment or consideration based on class or category rather than individual merit; partiality or prejudice: i.e., racial discrimination; discrimination against foreigners.

What part don't you understand ?
 
Is it racism if I thought that all black people voted for Barack because he "looked like them"? Is it racism if I thought that all whites voted for all the previous Presidents because they "looked like them"?

The racism isn't in the vote, it is in the negative stereotype that is associated with others through both ignorance and assumption. There may indeed be some people who voted for McCain "because" he was white, but they are extremely rare and it is certainly not well evidenced by the past Presidencies. Had zillions of whites voted against Obama that otherwise would normally vote Democrat you may have some evidence of this, but the idea that those who would normally vote for a republican due to policy disagreements with Democrats voted for McCain because he "looked like them" is ignorant pap. Trying to support it with such vehemence is oddly intriguing. Why do you want it to be true so much?

Emulating racists that would vote for "the guy that looks like them" is not something of which I would be proud. Assuming that everybody of a certain pigment have in the past is a gross assumption, clearly and flatly shown to be wrong by the fact that nobody crossed party lines to vote against Obama due to the fact that McCain "looked like them"...

As always, you completely misinterpret what I say, based on your knee-jerk reaction. I'm not trying to claim that tons of people voted against Obama because he's black. My whole argument on this thread is that I understand why guys like Jackson voted FOR Obama because he's black.

Next.
 
As always, you completely misinterpret what I say, based on your knee-jerk reaction. I'm not trying to claim that tons of people voted against Obama because he's black. My whole argument on this thread is that I understand why guys like Jackson voted FOR Obama because he's black.

Next.

Which only points to how you didn't read what I wrote. You can understand that, but would you say the same thing so proudly had the tables been turned, and why not? Who does he proudly emulate? Imaginary whites that would only vote for somebody who "looks like them"...

You then argued, in this thread, how Yurt should just agree because some rare circumstances where some dude may have voted for McCain because he "looked like them"...

I disagree, for the reasons I have listed above. Emulating those who you assume to be racist by voting "just like" you assume they did is not something of which I would ever be proud.

"next"...

:rolleyes:
 
Which only points to how you didn't read what I wrote. You can understand that, but would you say the same thing so proudly had the tables been turned, and why not? Who does he proudly emulate? Imaginary whites that would only vote for somebody who "looks like them"...

You then argued, in this thread, how Yurt should just agree because some rare circumstances where some dude may have voted for McCain because he "looked like them"...

I disagree, for the reasons I have listed above. Emulating those who you assume to be racist by voting "just like" you assume they did is not something of which I would ever be proud.

"next"...

:rolleyes:

So, you're firmly in the Yurt camp, then? You have absolutely NO IDEA why it would be important to someone who is black to see the FIRST BLACK PRESIDENT in their or anyone's lifetime?

Honestly? I find that astounding. It's incomprehensible to me, at all levels, how someone couldn't at least have an inkling of that.
 
So, you're firmly in the Yurt camp, then? You have absolutely NO IDEA why it would be important to someone who is black to see the FIRST BLACK PRESIDENT in their or anyone's lifetime?

Honestly? I find that astounding. It's incomprehensible to me, at all levels, how someone couldn't at least have an inkling of that.

It's simple. Conservatism is the politics of ignorance.

http://www.bidstrup.com/politics.htm
 
So, you're firmly in the Yurt camp, then? You have absolutely NO IDEA why it would be important to someone who is black to see the FIRST BLACK PRESIDENT in their or anyone's lifetime?

Honestly? I find that astounding. It's incomprehensible to me, at all levels, how someone couldn't at least have an inkling of that.

You again didn't read what I wrote. The racism isn't in the vote or in the racial pride that somebody "finally made it"... The racism is in the assumption about those that don't quite "look like him".

And again, do you believe the action should be emulated by every "race"?

I see the vote more like those who were Catholic that voted for Kennedy. A bit of Catholic pride is nothing bad and they were going to vote Democrat anyway, doing it with more excitement because it was the "first" isn't bad. I can more than live with that I can even see it being awesome and cool.

What I disagree with is supporting the additional negative stereotype thrown in that suggests that whites voted for the dude that "looked like them"... It is unsupportable by the evidence at hand and based solely on ignorant assumption.
 
As always, you completely misinterpret what I say, based on your knee-jerk reaction. I'm not trying to claim that tons of people voted against Obama because he's black. My whole argument on this thread is that I understand why guys like Jackson voted FOR Obama because he's black.

Next.


We all understand it.....its because they are voting by race, for or against.....thus, the term racist.
 
according to onceler, dung, poet et al....if you vote for a candidate based on their skin color it is not racist. therefore, all their claims of white racism in voting are false, because you can vote for someone just because they are white.

idiots
 
according to onceler, dung, poet et al....if you vote for a candidate based on their skin color it is not racist. therefore, all their claims of white racism in voting are false, because you can vote for someone just because they are white.

idiots

You're completely braindead on this one. Let's break it down, just for fun: do you see any difference at all in a white guy voting for a white guy just because he hates blacks, and a black guy voting for a black guy to break down barriers he's had to live w/ his whole life?
 
You're completely braindead on this one. Let's break it down, just for fun: do you see any difference at all in a white guy voting for a white guy just because he hates blacks, and a black guy voting for a black guy to break down barriers he's had to live w/ his whole life?

that is not what i said. what is wrong with a white guy voting for someone just because they are white? you have no problem with a black person voting for someone just because they are black....

and btw...your dishonesty in continuing to attribute jackson's reason to breaking down barriers is pathetic.
 
that is not what i said. what is wrong with a white guy voting for someone just because they are white? you have no problem with a black person voting for someone just because they are black....

and btw...your dishonesty in continuing to attribute jackson's reason to breaking down barriers is pathetic.

You need to read Jackson's comments again. He is absolutely, 100% talking about barriers.

You have no clue whatsoever what the black experience in America has been like over the years. It's embarassing.
 
Actually, it does. It's not racism. You obviously are clueless about the definition and its' tenets.

the ignorance is strong in you. 'tenets' has absolutely nothing to do with the definition of a term. It's nothing more than an attempt to divert from the truth of the matter.
 
according to onceler, dung, poet et al....if you vote for a candidate based on their skin color it is not racist. therefore, all their claims of white racism in voting are false, because you can vote for someone just because they are white.

idiots


That there's what's called a non sequitur. Nice work, Yurt. I can always count on you to be on the lookout for racism against the oppressed white majority.
 
You need to read Jackson's comments again. He is absolutely, 100% talking about barriers.

You have no clue whatsoever what the black experience in America has been like over the years. It's embarassing.

no he isn't. he voted for solely based on his skin color. he says it in the first sentence. as if you have a clue about the black experience....fucking hack
 
no he isn't. he voted for solely based on his skin color. he says it in the first sentence. as if you have a clue about the black experience....fucking hack

He's not talking about barriers? Really?

I say it all of the time, but man, you really can't read. Try taking a look at what he said again.

And sorry - you know shite about the black experience. Your repeated attempts at false equivalency, as though things have always been equal among the races & religions & everything else, is some of the most pathetic tripe I have read on this site.
 
He's not talking about barriers? Really?

I say it all of the time, but man, you really can't read. Trying taking a look at what he said again.

And sorry - you know shite about the black experience. Your repeated attempts at false equivalency, as though things have always been equal among the races & religions & everything else, is some of the most pathetic tripe I have read on this site.

and what makes you know anything about the black experience? your blatant acceptance of racism is pathetic.
 
Back
Top