‘I Voted for Barack Because He Was Black’

You're completely braindead on this one. Let's break it down, just for fun: do you see any difference at all in a white guy voting for a white guy just because he hates blacks, and a black guy voting for a black guy to break down barriers he's had to live w/ his whole life?

is it racism for a white guy to vote for a white guy because he believes that the white guy will fit his ideals better than a black guy?
 
and what makes you know anything about the black experience? your blatant acceptance of racism is pathetic.

I don't know anything about the black experience, but I know a gazillion times more about it than you do.

Anyone who tries to compare a black guy voting for Obama because he's black to a white guy voting for Romney because he's white is seriously out of touch.
 
Seriously. It would be cool to vote for a Buddhist for President. I wouldn't cross party lines to do it, but it would be cool. And some Buddhists that didn't vote in previous elections might register and vote in the election because it would be cool. I can see that. I can see why black people would be excited to vote for a black President. I just don't see why you would need to add that all those "whites" always did this in the past and suggest racism without evidence.
 
Seriously. It would be cool to vote for a Buddhist for President. I wouldn't cross party lines to do it, but it would be cool. And some Buddhists that didn't vote in previous elections might register and vote in the election because it would be cool. I can see that. I can see why black people would be excited to vote for a black President. I just don't see why you would need to add that all those "whites" always did this in the past and suggest racism without evidence.

Have Buddhists been oppressed in this country? Have they had to fight for their rights every step of the way?

A more apt comparison might be a woman voting for Hillary, again, just to break the barrier. I get that.

As for Jackson's "evidence," I can see where a black guy would look at the history of over 40 white males as President and conclude that perhaps there was some racism somewhere in there.
 
I don't know anything about the black experience, but I know a gazillion times more about it than you do.

Anyone who tries to compare a black guy voting for Obama because he's black to a white guy voting for Romney because he's white is seriously out of touch.

that argument would never pass for anyone but a liberal. it's pretty much in idiotic argument because it's just flat out wrong.
 
that argument would never pass for anyone but a liberal. it's pretty much in idiotic argument because it's just flat out wrong.

The only way it's "wrong" is if you can make the case that the black experience in America has been more or less identical to what the white experience has been.

Best o' luck w/ that one....
 
is it racism for a white guy to vote for a white guy because he believes that the white guy will fit his ideals better than a black guy?

No. And before 2008, it was never a serious issue to consider. But how many whites are voting for the white guy, simply because he's one of them...just like you and others are asserting the same of black people? I would surmise, "many".
 
Have Buddhists been oppressed in this country? Have they had to fight for their rights every step of the way?

A more apt comparison might be a woman voting for Hillary, again, just to break the barrier. I get that.

As for Jackson's "evidence," I can see where a black guy would look at the history of over 40 white males as President and conclude that perhaps there was some racism somewhere in there.

Again, the evidence before him clearly indicates otherwise. If such were evident he'd be talking about President McCain while stating he had voted for Barack because he was black.

I'll note you didn't bother to read the part of the post that agreed with you, you just went to full hack mode instead.

Which led you again supporting the fictional negative stereotype expressed. I'm good with that. Pretending that you can't understand why it is first false, and secondly a negative assumption based solely on somebody being of a different pigmentation is all good... so long as it supports whatever political agenda you do...
 
Again, the evidence before him clearly indicates otherwise. If such were evident he'd be talking about President McCain while stating he had voted for Barack because he was black.

Actually, the evidence at the time that he cast his vote for Obama, as of election day 2008, was a whole lot of white presidents. Now, I suppose it's wrong to suggest that white people made a conscious choice to vote for white candidates, but they never really had the opportunity to vote for a non-white person before Obama.
 
The only way it's "wrong" is if you can make the case that the black experience in America has been more or less identical to what the white experience has been.

Best o' luck w/ that one....

that's a crock of shit argument. plain and simple. the 'experience' is just your excuse for racism.
 
Actually, the evidence at the time that he cast his vote for Obama, as of election day 2008, was a whole lot of white presidents. Now, I suppose it's wrong to suggest that white people made a conscious choice to vote for white candidates, but they never really had the opportunity to vote for a non-white person before Obama.

Which again, was my point in the first post where Onceler deliberately missed my point and started in on this conversation we've been having between us. Immediate assumption of "white folk" notwithstanding, the current evidence clearly indicates that his statement is both ignorant and inaccurate, a negative view based solely on their pigmentation rather than evidence.
 
No. And before 2008, it was never a serious issue to consider. But how many whites are voting for the white guy, simply because he's one of them...just like you and others are asserting the same of black people? I would surmise, "many".

I couldn't tell you how many 'whites' are voting for the white guy simply because he's one of them. I've never been able to identify or understand that level of stupidity and ignorance.
 
Why...because you say so, and in so doing, ignore hundreds of years of history in the process?

Nah - I don't think so...

hundreds of years of history doesn't negate the fact that a person voted for president based on the color of his skin. that is racism. whether you choose to ignore or accept that is up to you.
 
I don't know anything about the black experience, but I know a gazillion times more about it than you do.

Anyone who tries to compare a black guy voting for Obama because he's black to a white guy voting for Romney because he's white is seriously out of touch.

lol...nice self pwn. you don't know anything, but you know more than..lmao. you don't know jack. you don't even know my experiences.

your last sentence proves your acceptance of racism, as long as it is not a white person, it is ok. voting for anyone based solely on their skin color has no place in this country. your acceptance of it is what is wrong with this country. so long as morons like you breathe, we will have racism.
 
Yurt night not be right all the time......but hes right this time......

As long as double standards are allowed and condoned there will be friction between the races, no matter what the color......

Equal treatment and justice for all are more that just words on a document, they actually do mean something.
 
This thread is . . . not sure how to describe it. It isn't really funny but it kind of is and sad just doesn't do it justice.

Bunch of privileged white guys getting their knickers in a knot because a black man who lived through the civil rights movement had the audacity to say that he voted for the first black presidential candidate because he was black all while invoking MLK (aside bit of trivia: Jackson was one of his pall bearers) and declaring that our "racist past" is kept alive and well by white people being sympathetic to that decision.
 
This thread is . . . not sure how to describe it. It isn't really funny but it kind of is and sad just doesn't do it justice.

Bunch of privileged white guys getting their knickers in a knot because a black man who lived through the civil rights movement had the audacity to say that he voted for the first black presidential candidate because he was black all while invoking MLK (aside bit of trivia: Jackson was one of his pall bearers) and declaring that our "racist past" is kept alive and well by white people being sympathetic to that decision.

translated: Racism is ok if it is one of our guys.
 
Back
Top