I told you this would be next - Al Qaeda Calls for Attacks Inside the US

Status
Not open for further replies.
The reality is, the viscoplasticity of steel tested by Northwestern University, shows that even a 200 degree Celsius fire significantly weakens the strength of the steel, the severing of many of the columns, the subsequent removal of fire protection from those that remained due to blast from the impact, and the heat of the fire, which would burn up to 600 degrees Celsius (and in some rare circumstances as high as 800, but that isn't actually important to the results of the studies) weakened significantly the remaining beams.

The remaining beams simply could not hold up as the building collapsed as they are simply incapable of holding the weight of impact. Think of a table made to hold up to 300 pounds with a 250 pound man standing on it. If he jumps, the weight at impact significantly would be higher than the 300 pounds causing the table to collapse. This is the same with the remaining structure, it simply could not hold up to the kinetic energy produced by so many upper levels collapsing onto them.

Like the Karyatid, she was crushed under a burden made too heavy to bear by stresses they were not designed to hold up to...
 
Damocles said:
The reality is, the viscoplasticity of steel tested by Northwestern University, shows that even a 200 degree Celsius fire significantly weakens the strength of the steel, the severing of many of the columns, the subsequent removal of fire protection from those that remained due to blast from the impact, and the heat of the fire, which would burn up to 600 degrees Celsius (and in some rare circumstances as high as 800, but that isn't actually important to the results of the studies) weakened significantly the remaining beams.

The remaining beams simply could not hold up as the building collapsed as they are simply incapable of holding the weight of impact. Think of a table made to hold up to 300 pounds with a 250 pound man standing on it. If he jumps, the weight at impact significantly would be higher than the 300 pounds causing the table to collapse. This is the same with the remaining structure, it simply could not hold up to the kinetic energy produced by so many upper levels collapsing onto them.

Like the Karyatid, she was crushed under a burden made too heavy to bear by stresses they were not designed to hold up to...
Click to expand...

So simple really! Any 7th. grade student of his school's metalworking class could tell you what happens to steel at relatively low temperatures. And the physics of the impact on the remaining floors is just as elementary.

But never doubt that conspiracy theorists want to hold onto their conspiracies and that makes logic and common sense unimportant to them. No matter how elegantly you try to present the evidence.

As for blackascoal, I wouldn't have expected it from her as I had been seeing her as one of the more intelligent members of this asshole of a forum.

I would imagine she's away right now preparing a great big yap off to back her nonsense. We'll see! And won't it be fun!
 
Jarod said:
A jet fuel fire burns hotter than a standard building fire. My father was an architect and I had many discussions with him about the way a fire would cause the WTC collapse, he was convensed that the heat of the jet fuel after a period of time caused the support structure to melt resulting in the start of the collapse then the weight of the collapsed portion brought down the remainder of the buildings.

This is why you hear the terrorists on the airplane radio shouting, "aim for the neck of the building". Had they crashed much higher, the weight of the upper floors would not have brought down the entire building AND portions of the fire would have more easily vented into the open air above the buildings.
Click to expand...

Jet Fuel burns off very rapidly; it was not the jet fuel. It was the fact that the impact destroyed the insulation on steel columns subjecting them to the intense heat of the resulting building fires that eventually broke their structural integrity down which then caused the floors to collapse upon one another increasing the weight and mass beyond the structural ability of the lower floors to withstand.

Go to minute 1.36:

 
Dungheap said:
What is? It happens every fucking year around the anniversary of 9/11. This year ain't no different.
Click to expand...

Well this year Obama has just armed Al Qaeda to the fuckin' hilt in Syria so they have new weapons to try out.....might as well
try them out on the US.....
 
NOVA said:
Well this year Obama has just armed Al Qaeda to the fuckin' hilt in Syria so they have new weapons to try out.....might as well
try them out on the US.....
Click to expand...

Don't be a racist and a hater. You know very well that Obama hasn't given Al Qaida any weapons and he certainly hasn't given them any with which they could threaten the US again.

They'll do it anyway and their own case for revenge keeps on being strengthened. That's the issue you should be concentrating on if you have a shred of decency.
 
blackascoal said:
Absolutely incredible.

Unfuckingbelievable

Obviously you've never had a physics class in your life.

Produce a collapsing structure that fell straight down from collapse .. anytime within the history of human kind.

Produce ANY steel-frame structure that has ever collapsed from fire .. anytime within the history of buildings, fire, or Man.

.. And, in your flawed analysis, be sure to include WTC7.

This is why I require people to pass the 3rd grade science test before being considered qualified to talk about things science .. you failed.
Click to expand...


Is that the extent of your reasoning, "it never happened before, therefore it cannot ever happen" ?....

There is more to the suspicion that Obama wasn't born in the US than your crazy conspiracy theory and we refer to the birthers as insane nutjobs....
 
monty1 said:
Don't be a racist and a hater. You know very well that Obama hasn't given Al Qaida any weapons and he certainly hasn't given them any with which they could threaten the US again.

They'll do it anyway and their own case for revenge keeps on being strengthened. That's the issue you should be concentrating on if you have a shred of decency.
Click to expand...


When he re-armed the Syrian rebels, he re-armed AQ......only a gullible fool like you would not see that.

As the advance in Syria, if they advance there, because of Obama new influx of weapons, who knows the type of weapons they could find.....

and what has race got to do with anything ?....Have I schooled that quickly that you have to play your race card so soon.
 
monty1 said:
What's really funny is your conspiracy theories on 911. and btw, what 'is' your theory? Did Bush2 have it all arranged and was it an inside job? YOU stupid dumb American cu-t!
Click to expand...
Bush was a puppet just like Obama is. They serve the people who print money. Do you even understand the world you live in?
 
Superfreak said:
tell us BAC... if the twin towers came straight down... how did WTC7 sustain so much damage?
Click to expand...

Have you watched the video of WTC7? How can you watch it and not conclude it was intentional? If there was damage enough to collapse the building, why did it fall symmetrically?
 
Superfreak said:
Actually, that is completely incorrect. Brush up on Physics. When you have 20-30 floors come down at once, each subsequent floor it hits is LESS mass than the floors falling from above. The structure is not designed for that kind of impact and gave way.
Click to expand...

Building 7:
You can't have material falling at free-fall speed if it's supposedly collapsing structure below it. There would have been greater deflection and subsequent deceleration of the falling debris.

If there were a damaged area that precipitated the collapse the structure would have shown more collapse in those areas first. It does not show any collapsing prior to total collapse. This defies physics unless there was complete loss of ALL the structural columns at once!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top