I told you this would be next - Al Qaeda Calls for Attacks Inside the US

Status
Not open for further replies.
B

blackascoal

The Force is With Me
Al Qaeda calls for attacks inside United States

DUBAI (Reuters) - Al Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahri urged small-scale attacks inside the United States to "bleed America economically", adding he hoped eventually to see a more significant strike, according to the SITE monitoring service.

In an audio speech released online a day after the 12th anniversary of the 9/11 strikes, Zawahri said attacks "by one brother or a few of the brothers" would weaken the U.S. economy by triggering big spending on security, SITE reported.

Western counter-terrorism chiefs have warned that radicalized "lone wolves" who might have had no direct contact with al Qaeda posed as great a risk as those who carried out complex plots like the 9/11 attacks.

"We should bleed America economically by provoking it to continue in its massive expenditure on its security, for the weak point of America is its economy, which has already begun to stagger due to the military and security expenditure," he said.

More of this bullshit at link
http://news.yahoo.com/al-qaeda-calls-attacks-inside-united-states-055757870.html

I said after Obama was prevented from destroying Syria that the MIC wouldn't take no for an answer .. so they reach into their bag of deception and pull out an Al CIADA asshole.

We are stupid people .. and they know it.
 
blackascoal said:
Al Qaeda calls for attacks inside United States

DUBAI (Reuters) - Al Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahri urged small-scale attacks inside the United States to "bleed America economically", adding he hoped eventually to see a more significant strike, according to the SITE monitoring service.

In an audio speech released online a day after the 12th anniversary of the 9/11 strikes, Zawahri said attacks "by one brother or a few of the brothers" would weaken the U.S. economy by triggering big spending on security, SITE reported.

Western counter-terrorism chiefs have warned that radicalized "lone wolves" who might have had no direct contact with al Qaeda posed as great a risk as those who carried out complex plots like the 9/11 attacks.

"We should bleed America economically by provoking it to continue in its massive expenditure on its security, for the weak point of America is its economy, which has already begun to stagger due to the military and security expenditure," he said.

More of this bullshit at link
http://news.yahoo.com/al-qaeda-calls-attacks-inside-united-states-055757870.html

I said after Obama was prevented from destroying Syria that the MIC wouldn't take no for an answer .. so they reach into their bag of deception and pull out an Al CIADA asshole.

We are stupid people .. and they know it.
Click to expand...


What's next? Blaming the MIC for the rising of the sun?
 
Cognitive Dissonance is a powerful mindfuck. It transfixes it's host with the terror of inconvenient truth .. the brain becomes motionless .. and all avenues to critical thought are blocked.

Even science no longer makes sense.

Let me help those who've never had 3rd grade science with the difficult parts.

Collapsing buildings do not fall straight down. It is scientifically IMPOSSIBLE.

Collapsing mass ALWAYS seeks the path of least resistance ALWAYS .. as in ALWAYS SEEKS THE PATH OF LEAST RESISTANCE.

Collapsing mass topples over .. the path of least resistance.

Collapsing mass can not fall through greater mass because it is scientifically IMPOSSIBLE.

You cannot replicate the events of 9/11 in a lab as claimed because it is scientifically IMPOSSIBLE.

The events of 9/11 as claimed are scientifically IMPOSSIBLE.

Added to this scientific IMPOSSIBILITY is American support for AL QAEDA with the tax dollars of the American people, and the Reichstag fire looks more believable.

TERROR ALERT TERROR ALERT .. DO AS YOU'RE TOLD
 
blackascoal said:
Cognitive Dissonance is a powerful mindfuck. It transfixes it's host with the terror of inconvenient truth .. the brain becomes motionless .. and all avenues to critical thought are blocked.

Even science no longer makes sense.

Let me help those who've never had 3rd grade science with the difficult parts.

Collapsing buildings do not fall straight down. It is scientifically IMPOSSIBLE.

Collapsing mass ALWAYS seeks the path of least resistance ALWAYS .. as in ALWAYS SEEKS THE PATH OF LEAST RESISTANCE.

Collapsing mass topples over .. the path of least resistance.

Collapsing mass can not fall through greater mass because it is scientifically IMPOSSIBLE.

You cannot replicate the events of 9/11 in a lab as claimed because it is scientifically IMPOSSIBLE.

The events of 9/11 as claimed are scientifically IMPOSSIBLE.

Added to this scientific IMPOSSIBILITY is American support for AL QAEDA with the tax dollars of the American people, and the Reichstag fire looks more believable.

TERROR ALERT TERROR ALERT .. DO AS YOU'RE TOLD
Click to expand...

Actually, that is completely incorrect. Brush up on Physics. When you have 20-30 floors come down at once, each subsequent floor it hits is LESS mass than the floors falling from above. The structure is not designed for that kind of impact and gave way.
 
The "mass" equation has been addressed before.


In terms of mass, the floors were comparable to tree trunks and the columns were like branches. The floor connections of the long span floors could support a load of a couple story masses and had an energy absorbing ability of a couple hundredths of a GJ per story. The floor connections were like crepe connecting the floors to the columns. The crepe was sufficient for the structure in its static organized state but was a weak link during collapse when the structure in the region of the collapse front no longer resembled the static organized state.
Click to expand...

http://www.debunking911.com/collapse.htm
 
blackascoal said:
Cognitive Dissonance is a powerful mindfuck. It transfixes it's host with the terror of inconvenient truth .. the brain becomes motionless .. and all avenues to critical thought are blocked.

Even science no longer makes sense.

Let me help those who've never had 3rd grade science with the difficult parts.

Collapsing buildings do not fall straight down. It is scientifically IMPOSSIBLE.

Collapsing mass ALWAYS seeks the path of least resistance ALWAYS .. as in ALWAYS SEEKS THE PATH OF LEAST RESISTANCE.

Collapsing mass topples over .. the path of least resistance.

Collapsing mass can not fall through greater mass because it is scientifically IMPOSSIBLE.

You cannot replicate the events of 9/11 in a lab as claimed because it is scientifically IMPOSSIBLE.

The events of 9/11 as claimed are scientifically IMPOSSIBLE.

Added to this scientific IMPOSSIBILITY is American support for AL QAEDA with the tax dollars of the American people, and the Reichstag fire looks more believable.

TERROR ALERT TERROR ALERT .. DO AS YOU'RE TOLD
Click to expand...

Another quasi whacko conspiracy theorist with zero comprehension of structural engineering.

So you think 9-11 was a conspiracy inside job? Whacko.
 
Superfreak said:
Actually, that is completely incorrect. Brush up on Physics. When you have 20-30 floors come down at once, each subsequent floor it hits is LESS mass than the floors falling from above. The structure is not designed for that kind of impact and gave way.
Click to expand...

Absolutely incredible.

Unfuckingbelievable

Obviously you've never had a physics class in your life.

Produce a collapsing structure that fell straight down from collapse .. anytime within the history of human kind.

Produce ANY steel-frame structure that has ever collapsed from fire .. anytime within the history of buildings, fire, or Man.

.. And, in your flawed analysis, be sure to include WTC7.

This is why I require people to pass the 3rd grade science test before being considered qualified to talk about things science .. you failed.
 
1. About 60% of the 60 columns of the impacted face of framed-tube (and about 13% of the total of 287 columns) were severed, and many more were significantly deflected. This caused stress redistribution, which significantly increased the load of some columns, near the load capacity for some of them.

2. Fire insulation was stripped during aircraft impact by flying debris (without that, the towers would likely have survived). In consequence, many structural steel members heated up to 600±C (NIST 2005) (the structural steel used loses about 20% of its yield strength already at 300±C, NIST 2005, and exhibits significant visco-plasticity, or creep, above 450±, especially at high stresses that developed; see e.g. Cottrell 1964, p. 299; the press reports right after 9/11, indicating temperature in excess of 800±C, turned out to be groundless, but Bazant and Zhou's analysis did not depend on that).

3. Differential thermal expansion, combined with heat-induced viscoplastic deformation, caused the floor trusses to sag. The sagging trusses pulled the perimeter columns inward (by about 1 m, NIST 2005). The bowing of columns served as a huge imperfection inducing multi-story buckling. The lateral deflections of some columns due to aircraft impact and differential thermal expansion also decreased buckling strength.

4. The combination of six effects

a) overload of some columns due to initial stress redistribution,
b ) lowering of yield limit and creep,
c) lateral deflections of many columns due to sagging floor trusses,
d) weakened lateral support due to reduced in-plane stiffess of sagging floors,
e) multi-story buckling of some columns (for which the critical load is an order of magnitude less than it is for one-story buckling), and
f) local plastic buckling of heated column webs finally led to buckling of columns (Fig. 1b). As a result, the upper part of tower fell, with little resistance, through at least one floor height, impacting the lower part of tower. This triggered progressive collapse because the kinetic energy of the falling upper part far exceeded the energy that could be absorbed by limited plastic deformations and fracturing in the lower part of tower. (Bazant, Verdure, 2006)

http://www.civil.northwestern.edu/people/bazant/PDFs/Papers
/ProgressiveCollapseWTC-6-23-2006.pdf
 
Truth Detector said:
Another quasi whacko conspiracy theorist with zero comprehension of structural engineering.

So you think 9-11 was a conspiracy inside job? Whacko.
Click to expand...

You can go play in the street and dodge cars if action is what you're looking for.

I have no interests in your girlish emotions .. demonstrate that collapsing buildings fall straight down.

Demonstrate that collapsing mass does not seek the path of least resistance and topple over.

Tell me how it is that your tax dollars now support the very element that you believe was behind 9/11.

Do things like that .. something useful .. save your emotions for your wife.

Not a singe one of you swallowers can do any of that.
 
blackascoal said:
Absolutely incredible.

Unfuckingbelievable

Obviously you've never had a physics class in your life.

Produce a collapsing structure that fell straight down from collapse .. anytime within the history of human kind.

Produce ANY steel-frame structure that has ever collapsed from fire .. anytime within the history of buildings, fire, or Man.

.. And, in your flawed analysis, be sure to include WTC7.

This is why I require people to pass the 3rd grade science test before being considered qualified to talk about things science .. you failed.
Click to expand...


You continue to pretend it was 'just a fire'. It was not. It is that type of intellectual dishonesty that makes your comments so foolish on this topic.

Show me another example of a jumbo plane hitting a 110 story building about a third of the way down or more taking out support columns and add jet fuel to the equation. Oh yeah, you can't.

As for WTC7, you ignore again the damage done to the building from the debris of the two towers. I wonder why? Let me guess, you will post a pic of the undamaged side?
 
Montessa said:
1. About 60% of the 60 columns of the impacted face of framed-tube (and about 13% of the total of 287 columns) were severed, and many more were significantly deflected. This caused stress redistribution, which significantly increased the load of some columns, near the load capacity for some of them.

2. Fire insulation was stripped during aircraft impact by flying debris (without that, the towers would likely have survived). In consequence, many structural steel members heated up to 600±C (NIST 2005) (the structural steel used loses about 20% of its yield strength already at 300±C, NIST 2005, and exhibits significant visco-plasticity, or creep, above 450±, especially at high stresses that developed; see e.g. Cottrell 1964, p. 299; the press reports right after 9/11, indicating temperature in excess of 800±C, turned out to be groundless, but Bazant and Zhou's analysis did not depend on that).

3. Differential thermal expansion, combined with heat-induced viscoplastic deformation, caused the floor trusses to sag. The sagging trusses pulled the perimeter columns inward (by about 1 m, NIST 2005). The bowing of columns served as a huge imperfection inducing multi-story buckling. The lateral deflections of some columns due to aircraft impact and differential thermal expansion also decreased buckling strength.

4. The combination of six effects

a) overload of some columns due to initial stress redistribution,
b ) lowering of yield limit and creep,
c) lateral deflections of many columns due to sagging floor trusses,
d) weakened lateral support due to reduced in-plane stiffess of sagging floors,
e) multi-story buckling of some columns (for which the critical load is an order of magnitude less than it is for one-story buckling), and
f) local plastic buckling of heated column webs finally led to buckling of columns (Fig. 1b). As a result, the upper part of tower fell, with little resistance, through at least one floor height, impacting the lower part of tower. This triggered progressive collapse because the kinetic energy of the falling upper part far exceeded the energy that could be absorbed by limited plastic deformations and fracturing in the lower part of tower. (Bazant, Verdure, 2006)

http://www.civil.northwestern.edu/people/bazant/PDFs/Papers
/ProgressiveCollapseWTC-6-23-2006.pdf
Click to expand...


I'm not really interested in going through all the evidence again. If you don't know what a controlled demolition looks like, so be it.

If you think America supporting the same terrorist organization that was supposedly behind 9/11 is normal .. so be it.

I remain abosultely stunned by how weak we Americans truly are.
 
Uu
blackascoal said:
Absolutely incredible.

Unfuckingbelievable

Obviously you've never had a physics class in your life.

Produce a collapsing structure that fell straight down from collapse .. anytime within the history of human kind.

Produce ANY steel-frame structure that has ever collapsed from fire .. anytime within the history of buildings, fire, or Man.

.. And, in your flawed analysis, be sure to include WTC7.

This is why I require people to pass the 3rd grade science test before being considered qualified to talk about things science .. you failed.
Click to expand...

You studied physics? What is your degree in? I think you got a bullshit degree from the school of whacked conspiracy theorists.
 
Superfreak said:
You continue to pretend it was 'just a fire'. It was not. It is that type of intellectual dishonesty that makes your comments so foolish on this topic.

Show me another example of a jumbo plane hitting a 110 story building about a third of the way down or more taking out support columns and add jet fuel to the equation. Oh yeah, you can't.

As for WTC7, you ignore again the damage done to the building from the debris of the two towers. I wonder why? Let me guess, you will post a pic of the undamaged side?
Click to expand...

windsor4.jpg


windsor7.jpg


windsor6.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top