I told you this would be next - Al Qaeda Calls for Attacks Inside the US

[monty1]

Cognitive Dissonance is a powerful mindfuck. It transfixes it's host with the terror of inconvenient truth .. the brain becomes motionless .. and all avenues to critical thought are blocked.

Even science no longer makes sense.

Let me help those who've never had 3rd grade science with the difficult parts.

Collapsing buildings do not fall straight down. It is scientifically IMPOSSIBLE.

Collapsing mass ALWAYS seeks the path of least resistance ALWAYS .. as in ALWAYS SEEKS THE PATH OF LEAST RESISTANCE.

Collapsing mass topples over .. the path of least resistance.

Collapsing mass can not fall through greater mass because it is scientifically IMPOSSIBLE.

You cannot replicate the events of 9/11 in a lab as claimed because it is scientifically IMPOSSIBLE.

The events of 9/11 as claimed are scientifically IMPOSSIBLE.

Added to this scientific IMPOSSIBILITY is American support for AL QAEDA with the tax dollars of the American people, and the Reichstag fire looks more believable.

TERROR ALERT TERROR ALERT .. DO AS YOU'RE TOLD

EXCELLENT! You are smarter than I ever thought. You know the government hypnotized everyone so they would see the WTC building coming straight down when in fact they fell to the side as was being dictated by the laws of physics.

You're one of the smwartest Americans there ever was, and that takes some doing!

Back to the issue. Would it be time to ask the question: Who started the fight, Al Qaida or the US?

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

Also BAC... please show us a controlled demolition of a building 100+ stories....

Because if it hasn't happened before, it obviously can't happen according to your logic.

 

[Jarod]

Jet fuel burns at 980 Degrees in confined space, about 600 in an open air environment.

 

[monty1]

Again, had YOU ever taken a physics class, you would know how absurdly wrong you are.

Yes, they are absurdly wrong but they need to hang onto the conspiracy theory for some strange reason. I could have something to do with American exceptionalism which prevents America from being attacked from outside.

Simplest way to make them understand is to show a piece of steel turn into a spaghetti noodle when it's heated up a little over cherry red.

Stupid people or just stubborn people?

 

[Bonestorm]

Jet fuel burns at 980 Degrees in confined space, about 600 in an open air environment.

The fire that I spit burns hotter than than. [/Dylan]

 

[blackascoal]

Again, had YOU ever taken a physics class, you would know how absurdly wrong you are.

You keep giving this commentary brother. While entertaining, you leave out any thought about where I'm wrong and you don't offer any science to support what you really want .. make that what you really NEED to believe.

Start from here, localized damage cannot cause asymmetrical collapse. How easy is that to disprove? You should have the rebuttal right on the top of your head .. but you don't. Why don't you? Because what I said is the truth .. and if you expand on that truth .. you would have to have NO understanding of science or physics to believe that this asymmetrical collapse could possibly be the result of something hitting it.

You'd have to be a MORON to believe that .. OR, your mind has to be in the state I describe in my sig.

Compare the fires of the buildings that I posted to the raging fire that you don't see here.

PAY ATTENTION to the top of the building while it collapses. Do you know what you're looking at? It's the beginning of a controlled demolition ,, where the roof caves in first .. do you see that? .. then the roof pulls the outer walls inward so the end result is this ..

.. walls pulled inward and lying on top of the roof .. sitting in its own footprint. Notice the building next to it didn't even get touched by the collapse. CLASSIC CD.

By no stretch of the imagination are you a moron .. but if you can't see the missing science in that video, your mind simply cannot handle what your eyes clearly see.

 

[monty1]

No plane hit WTC7 and there were surrounding buildings that sustained much more damage than WTC7 which has relatively small fires .. AND AND AND .. had you ever taken a physics class you would understand the concept of a universal asymmetrical collapse and understand that it cannot happen from localized damage.

AND AND AND .. WTC7 after its implosion sitting in its own footprints exactly as an imploded building would ..

I know, I'm making all this up.

You're right again. I was there watching for six weeks before 911 while they set all the charges that were required to bring down WTC7. And I'm tellin ya, it was one hell of a job to keep distracting all the people by giving them free hot dogs and French fries when they were coming and going! But us Canadians did it!

 

[blackascoal]

You're right again. I was there watching for six weeks before 911 while they set all the charges that were required to bring down WTC7. And I'm tellin ya, it was one hell of a job to keep distracting all the people by giving them free hot dogs and French fries when they were coming and going! But us Canadians did it!

You know what I like about dumb people?

They're dumb. :0)

Would it not also require a power down of the buildings to avoid being detected by the massive security that had to be resident in the buildings given who their tenants were?

Of course what dummy would believe that such a thing was even possible GIVEN WHO THEIR TENANTS WERE.

How in the name of God could such a thing have been possible?

Lets you and I bet.

I produce how that was accomplished and you never say negative things about this site ever again.

If I lose, I'll kill myself.

Bet?

 

[monty1]

You know what I like about dumb people?

They're dumb. :0)

Would it not also require a power down of the buildings to avoid being detected by the massive security that had to be resident in the buildings given who their tenants were?

Of course what dummy would believe that such a thing was even possible GIVEN WHO THEIR TENANTS WERE.

How in the name of God could such a thing have been possible?

Lets you and I bet.

I produce how that was accomplished and you never say negative things about this site ever again.

If I lose, I'll kill myself.

Bet?

You're on sister! But you are going to have to remain with a credible argument and when I destroy your argument with physics or some other method then you will have to be honest enough to at least talk about what I'm suggesting. I'm more than happy to get the chance to kick your ass for you even though I know that you are so immersed in your conspiracy theories that bombing your bicycle to bits wouldn't change your mind. Go for it! Start with Building 7 if you prefer and present your evidence that it just didn't collapse due to the fires and falling debris.

And I won't be accepting of amateur rhetoric that can't stand the test of physics. This has got to be on a totally serious level. I'm sure you wouldn't want it any other way! ;')

 

[monty1]

It took a hell of a pile of hot dogs to distract all those people from what was going on around them while we set the charges to bring down building 7. But we did it!

Would anybody like to see my pictures of people walking by with their hot dogs and French fries while the bomb experts were working right beside them?

Amazing the power of a French fry and a big mac with Americans! Healthy food never would have did it!

 

[Truth Detector]

There are conspiracy theories for just about everything; but I don't think anyone really comprehends how many people would have to be involved to pull off the kind of conspiracy many believe re: 9/11.

It would be literally impossible in the instant media age to even plan something like that, much less pull it off. Not improbable - impossible.

People in the field have looked at 9/11; you can't compare the heat generated by the jet fuel to an ordinary building fire.

The simple logic of what you post is beyond the comprehension level of brain dead sheeple with political agendas.

It is assuring to know people like you who actually have a brain are out there to counter the lunacy that surrouds us today.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

You keep giving this commentary brother. While entertaining, you leave out any thought about where I'm wrong and you don't offer any science to support what you really want .. make that what you really NEED to believe.

Start from here, localized damage cannot cause asymmetrical collapse. How easy is that to disprove? You should have the rebuttal right on the top of your head .. but you don't. Why don't you? Because what I said is the truth .. and if you expand on that truth .. you would have to have NO understanding of science or physics to believe that this asymmetrical collapse could possibly be the result of something hitting it.

You'd have to be a MORON to believe that .. OR, your mind has to be in the state I describe in my sig.

Compare the fires of the buildings that I posted to the raging fire that you don't see here.

PAY ATTENTION to the top of the building while it collapses. Do you know what you're looking at? It's the beginning of a controlled demolition ,, where the roof caves in first .. do you see that? .. then the roof pulls the outer walls inward so the end result is this ..

.. walls pulled inward and lying on top of the roof .. sitting in its own footprint. Notice the building next to it didn't even get touched by the collapse. CLASSIC CD.

By no stretch of the imagination are you a moron .. but if you can't see the missing science in that video, your mind simply cannot handle what your eyes clearly see.

This just goes to show how dishonest you are on this topic. I provided a link that thoroughly debunks your nonsense.

Also... no demolition crew is going to rig a building to blow from the top. None. Never has happened. So by your definition that means it cannot happen.

Here is the link again....

[h=2][/h]

http://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/pseudosc/911nutphysics.htm


​

 

[monty1]

Very few people take the conspiracy theories seriously. But for those who do they should look up some of the studies which have been done on why people get involved in them.

Most don't because they have their lives to lead and just don't have time for the obvious nonsense.

On the positive side, it's a lot of fun to play a conspiracy theorist when their conspiracy is so obvious. This one is the mother of all conspiracy theories!

 

[Truth Detector]

Sure I do .

It burned INTENSELY .. FAR more intensely that ANYTHING burning on 9/11 .. and it burned for 26 hours .. AND, after the fire the building remained standing .. even the crane on top of the building remained intact.

Fire does not cause buildings to collapse .. never has in the history of buildings, fire, of Man.

For the gullible fools who continue to express their desire to wallow in ignorance; read and become informed instead of gullible buffoons:

"The damaged columns held up the weight of the building, so logic would dictate that the building would fall," said Hamburger, "but that didn't happen. Because of its great structural redundancy, the load was distributed to other parts of the building. We have reason to believe that, without the fire, the buildings could have stood indefinitely and been repaired. But we did have a fire."

"The impact probably caused a failure of the fireproofing in the affected areas," he said. "We think that the fuel ignited several floors in the building," he added, which had a devastating effect on the steel support beams.

"Steel is born of fire," Hamburger explained. "As it's reheated, it expands and loses its rigidity. Above 1,000 degrees Fahrenheit, it loses a significant amount of its strength."

He said the extreme heat from the fires might have caused the steel floors to expand and bow, which may have caused the support columns to bend inward and buckle. Heat also may have caused the steel flooring to separate from the columns, or the columns themselves may have heated up and buckled outward.

Hamburger and his colleagues have not yet determined which of these scenarios occurred on Sept. 11, but there is little doubt that the collapse of the upper floors of the WTC towers brought down both structures.

"Think of the impact of dropping a 25-story building straight down," Hamburger told the audience. "It was like a pile driver, which is why it collapsed as it did."

http://news.stanford.edu/news/2001/december5/wtc-125.html

 

[Truth Detector]

It should be noted that I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything. I don't have to .. I don't care. :0) I really do not.

I'm simply marveling at the incredible gullibility of some people.

Even when they throw AL QAEDA in your face .. you remain dumb as a rock. :0) I find that shit absolutely amazing.

Why don't I give a fuck what you think? Because the fairy-tale of 9/11 is falling apart. Today, you almost have to be an American to believe that bullshit.

Incredible irony from someone who is obviously dumber than a rock.

 

[Truth Detector]

You keep giving this commentary brother. While entertaining, you leave out any thought about where I'm wrong and you don't offer any science to support what you really want .. make that what you really NEED to believe.

Start from here, localized damage cannot cause asymmetrical collapse. How easy is that to disprove? You should have the rebuttal right on the top of your head .. but you don't. Why don't you? Because what I said is the truth .. and if you expand on that truth .. you would have to have NO understanding of science or physics to believe that this asymmetrical collapse could possibly be the result of something hitting it.

You'd have to be a MORON to believe that .. OR, your mind has to be in the state I describe in my sig.

Compare the fires of the buildings that I posted to the raging fire that you don't see here.

PAY ATTENTION to the top of the building while it collapses. Do you know what you're looking at? It's the beginning of a controlled demolition ,, where the roof caves in first .. do you see that? .. then the roof pulls the outer walls inward so the end result is this ..

.. walls pulled inward and lying on top of the roof .. sitting in its own footprint. Notice the building next to it didn't even get touched by the collapse. CLASSIC CD.

By no stretch of the imagination are you a moron .. but if you can't see the missing science in that video, your mind simply cannot handle what your eyes clearly see.

Another moronic analysis from the clueless buffoon who thinks anyone who doesn't believe their lunatic assertions must be stupid:

 

[monty1]

Incredible irony from someone who is obviously dumber than a rock.

She's not dumb, she's shown that she's quite bright, but it doesn't take stupidity to fall into a conspiracy theory. It takes some other special reason that is in her mental makeup to be flawed.

If people on this forum weren't so obviously stupid and politicized by their propagandists they may rise to the level of attempting to discover what that really is.

 

[Truth Detector]

I think the 9/11 attacks were done by Saudi supported al queda trained, (thus through unintended consequences the US government), suicide bombers. I don't think the US government through its agencies actively participated in those attacks. Basically the attacks results were likely a stroke of luck in the sense the buildings collapsed, a bit of bad luck was the timing as in they happened too early for the casualties that would have happened if committed an hour later.

So while not in agreement with this part of BAC's argument, I'm coming around to most of his thinking regarding the connections between MIC, banking, governments, etc.

Another dullard analogy coming to a dullard conclusion; bravo, you have achieved the status of gullible.

 

[Truth Detector]

She's not dumb, she's shown that she's quite bright, but it doesn't take stupidity to fall into a conspiracy theory. It takes some other special reason that is in her mental makeup to be flawed.

If people on this forum weren't so obviously stupid and politicized by their propagandists they may rise to the level of attempting to discover what that really is.

Based on what I have read of her so far; smart or intelligent are hardly the correct adjectives. Vulgar and ignorant are her forte' as evidenced on this thread where she insults anyone who disagrees with her dullard notions about physics and what occurred on 9-11.

In my opinion, it requires an immense level of ignorance to believe in conspiracy theories that require the willing suspension of disbelief.

 

[monty1]

Truth detector, shit pile, and other fellow government agents. Beware, I think they are on to us!

And beside, Feinstein is watching!