I hope justice will be served. Bye bye Comey

Poor Richard Saunders said:
What you think violates the way the law works. You are simply arguing that your feelings are not based on reality. The indictment tells us what they supposedly investigated. Then to top it off, once an indictment occurs, the investigation is pretty much locked down. They can't keep trying to find new evidence without violating the rights of the accused.

When you are delusional as you always appear, no wonder you can't tell reality of who is who.

One doesn't look for a straw man. One builds it by claiming your opponent is making an argument they did not make.

What happened the last time only points out your delusions when you claimed that "Libtards are always wrong about everything." Clearly all those claiming that Comey and James would never go to trial but the cased would be thrown out were correct.

So the bottom line is you are all for using the law to try to bankrupt someone even if you can't prove a crime. How very un-American of you.
Click to expand...
@FastLane actually acknowledged this very early in the Trump revenge prosecutions when it was clear Trump and his DoJ were bringing unwinnable cases. He said the point was to force them to spend lots of money defending.
 
QP! said:
@FastLane actually acknowledged this very early in the Trump revenge prosecutions when it was clear Trump and his DoJ were bringing unwinnable cases. He said the point was to force them to spend lots of money defending.
Click to expand...
That is the best you can hope for in districts like Washington DC with partisan juries.
 
QP! said:
those are not the only locations Trumps flailing DOj have filed charged and been embarrassed.
Click to expand...
AI Overview



As of early 2026, the Trump Department of Justice (DOJ) has achieved significant legal victories, particularly through emergency supreme court rulings, boasting an 18-case winning streak on the "shadow docket" in 2025. Key wins include restricting lower court nationwide injunctions, upholding agency staff firing, and advancing immigration, health, and funding policies. [1, 2, 3]
 
AProudLefty said:
Sorry that you're unable to comprehend my post.

Hope this helps:

"86" (or "eighty-six") is a slang term primarily meaning to throw out, discard, refuse service, or remove an item, often used in restaurants, bars, and general conversation. It signifies that something is gone, unavailable, or a person is no longer welcome. It is often used as a verb ("86'd")
Click to expand...
It also stands for 80 miles out and 6 feet deep. Especially if in NY or NJ.
 
FastLane said:
AI Overview



As of early 2026, the Trump Department of Justice (DOJ) has achieved significant legal victories, particularly through emergency supreme court rulings, boasting an 18-case winning streak on the "shadow docket" in 2025. Key wins include restricting lower court nationwide injunctions, upholding agency staff firing, and advancing immigration, health, and funding policies. [1, 2, 3]
Click to expand...
Yes agreed. The SC is rogue and in the tank for Trump weaponizing the Shadow docket so they rule in record numbers of cases, breaking precedents and not having to be open with the public and explaining why.

But in weaponized indictments in top headlines cases against enemies Trumps DoJ is on laughable losing streak.
 
Matt Dillon said:
Are you? It stands for 80 miles out and 6 feet deep, Cosa Nostra style, retarded faggot.
Click to expand...
As you admitted, it has other meanings, like to cut one off, limit their power, refuse service. This is why such criminal charges are idiotic, and are the doings of idiots.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
What you think violates the way the law works. You are simply arguing that your feelings are not based on reality. The indictment tells us what they supposedly investigated. Then to top it off, once an indictment occurs, the investigation is pretty much locked down. They can't keep trying to find new evidence without violating the rights of the accused.

When you are delusional as you always appear, no wonder you can't tell reality of who is who.

One doesn't look for a straw man. One builds it by claiming your opponent is making an argument they did not make.

What happened the last time only points out your delusions when you claimed that "Libtards are always wrong about everything." Clearly all those claiming that Comey and James would never go to trial but the cased would be thrown out were correct.

So the bottom line is you are all for using the law to try to bankrupt someone even if you can't prove a crime. How very un-American of you.
Click to expand...
No, he was indicted you moron. You have no idea what they have. I'm happy to see him spend money because he caused many innocent people to spend far too much of their money defending bullshit charges from Comey's FBI. I hope he is convicted too. Time will tell. Try really hard to get over it, lol. You poor bastard's have had a rough week for sure, but wow, this one has you tied up in knots. Comey was indicted you moron. The case will play out in court and either he'll walk or he won't. If what I call justice is served, he'll be convicted from what I already know, but I suspect there will be more before it's over.

You can pretend they have nothing and its only politics. What normal sane people know? The former director of the FBI posted a message that said Kill Trump on Instagram. Nobody is above the law. That's a threat to the President's life in any normal person's book, especially coming from a former director of the FBI. A guy that has intimate knowledge of a lot of bad actors all around the world. A guy that could be sending a message to very capable adversaries he might be aligned with. One could come up with hundreds of realistic scenarios that a former FBI director could be up to that could never apply to the average Joe six-pack. I'm just saying there are a lot of angles a TDS blinded moron like yourself could never imagine.

You? You're a hopeless radicalized dumbass. But if the tables were turned, you'd be the first to call for heads to roll regardless of what you say here and now. How do I know? Again, you're a drone, what drones do is very easily predicted. We'll see what happens, again, time will tell.

In the meantime, do you best to get over it. I'm in wait and see mode, you're in denial. It's hilarious to see how worked up you are about this one.
 
Tobytone said:
No, he was indicted you moron. You have no idea what they have. I'm happy to see him spend money because he caused many innocent people to spend far too much of their money defending bullshit charges from Comey's FBI. I hope he is convicted too. Time will tell. Try really hard to get over it, lol. You poor bastard's have had a rough week for sure, but wow, this one has you tied up in knots. Comey was indicted you moron. The case will play out in court and either he'll walk or he won't. If what I call justice is served, he'll be convicted from what I already know, but I suspect there will be more before it's over.
Click to expand...
Who said he wasn't indicted? He was indicted and that is why the law has to be followed in order to convict him. You have admitted you don't know any of the facts of the case but now say he will be convicted based on what you know? You do like to reveal how stupid you are.
Tobytone said:
You can pretend they have nothing and its only politics. What normal sane people know? The former director of the FBI posted a message that said Kill Trump on Instagram. Nobody is above the law. That's a threat to the President's life in any normal person's book, especially coming from a former director of the FBI. A guy that has intimate knowledge of a lot of bad actors all around the world. A guy that could be sending a message to very capable adversaries he might be aligned with. One could come up with hundreds of realistic scenarios that a former FBI director could be up to that could never apply to the average Joe six-pack. I'm just saying there are a lot of angles a TDS blinded moron like yourself could never imagine.
Click to expand...
I am not pretending anything. I am merely talking about facts and the law. Claiming it was a message that said "Kill Trump" is the height if idiocy. 86 doesn't mean kill. It doesn't matter how many scenarios you can come up with. Those scenarios are not evidence. They are speculation and in the US we don't convict anyone on speculation. Courts require facts and evidence. The simple fact is they didn't indict Comey for any of those scenarios you fantasize about. That means they don't have evidence to support your delusions.
Tobytone said:
You? You're a hopeless radicalized dumbass. But if the tables were turned, you'd be the first to call for heads to roll regardless of what you say here and now. How do I know? Again, you're a drone, what drones do is very easily predicted. We'll see what happens, again, time will tell.

In the meantime, do you best to get over it. I'm in wait and see mode, you're in denial. It's hilarious to see how worked up you are about this one.
Click to expand...
Interesting that you think what Comey posted is a threat but the same thing isn't a threat when it is being sold on Amazon. That fact alone goes to show that the prosecution is vindictive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: QP!
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top