I hope justice will be served. Bye bye Comey

[Tobytone]

Yes, deflection off Iran, to refocus the media, but the Venezuela style war Trump envisioned didn’t quite turn out that way and now his “short and easy” war has turned into a major quagmire largely due to his and whisky Pete’s incompetence.

As gas prices rise and no break at the grocery store Donnie needs all the deflections he can muster

My God you drones are so pathetic, it's getting harder to consider you idiots adults. I often wonder if I'm being punked by a 12-year-old. How these idiots believe the shit they say is a mystery. Maybe it's because so many of them are corrupt, lying, cheating, losers. People tend to think the whole world does and acts as they do or would. Every thief thinks everybody steals, every cokehead thinks, they're all doing coke, etc. etc.

High numbers of libtards cheat, lie, steal, and betray people so much, they assume everyone does the same. They live in a small delusional world. Who knows what the cause is for sure, all I know is libtards are some of the dumbest people I know. Just to be clear, I don't mean the least intelligent. Most of us know the difference and exactly what I'm talking about. I'll be happy to explain it to Chivy or any libtard that asks.

Chivy thinks Trump literally used the lives of thousands of great American soldiers to launch an unnecessary war without a plan, without any idea how to end it, no consideration to all the people that would die and might die, all to deflect from Epstein at first and now that 'he's screwed' (according to a misinformed moron) he had Comey arrested to distract from this 'quagmire'?

Chivy is as delusional as it gets. He's a radicalized drone that parrots lies without any thought. It's hilarious that he used the latest buzz word I'm suddenly hearing all the puppet masters saying, 'quagmire'. If you haven't heard it yet, you will.

 

[Tobytone]

The evidence is that Comey is such a threat that they not only didn't indict him until over a year after he posted that picture and then they didn't argue for any bail because he was a threat. It's rather hard to argue he was a threat to the President based on those facts and yet that is what they will have to argue in court to convict him.

The investigation itself was more than 10 months. It's illegal to threaten any president regardless of who you are. His or your feeling mean nothing. We have no idea what evidence they have yet. We'll know much more soon. I suspect it's significant. I don't see Blanche as a guy that likes to lose. Time will tell. Libtards are doing what they always do, acting hysterical and jumping to ridiculous conclusions that fit the constant insane narrative.

As far as your 'brilliant' point about not asking to keep him in jail. It would be quite hard to suggest that the president isn't sufficiently secured against a threat from Comey assuming he agreed to not post any more threats while this case is ongoing and agreed as I'm sure he did, not to travel anywhere Trump is. There's not a judge alive that would keep anyone charged with the same crime in jail with no prior record. Nobody is complaining about either. I'll bet if roles were reversed libtards would be rioting in the streets if he wasn't thrown in solitary until trial.

You're not thinking as usual.

 

[LurchAddams]

MY guess is the when the judge rules that Comey is entitled to grand jury proceedings to see if the law was followed DOJ drops the case. Just like they did in Chicago for those accused of conspiracy. The current Trump lawyers don't dare let the courts see what they did without risking their law licenses.

Well, those law licenses are already at risk. Bondi and Blanche especially will likely be disbared.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

The investigation itself was more than 10 months. It's illegal to threaten any president regardless of who you are. His or your feeling mean nothing. We have no idea what evidence they have yet. We'll know much more soon. I suspect it's significant. I don't see Blanche as a guy that likes to lose. Time will tell. Libtards are doing what they always do, acting hysterical and jumping to ridiculous conclusions that fit the constant insane narrative.

You just seem to have given the perfect defense. It took more than 10 months to come to the conclusion it was a threat. Waiting 10 months proves it wasn't much of a threat since no action was taken in that 10 months.

As far as your 'brilliant' point about not asking to keep him in jail. It would be quite hard to suggest that the president isn't sufficiently secured against a threat from Comey assuming he agreed to not post any more threats while this case is ongoing and agreed as I'm sure he did, not to travel anywhere Trump is. There's not a judge alive that would keep anyone charged with the same crime in jail with no prior record. Nobody is complaining about either. I'll bet if roles were reversed libtards would be rioting in the streets if he wasn't thrown in solitary until trial.

The funny part is you don't seem to have a clue about reality. The judge in Comey's case did NOT require Comey to stay away from Trump. Comey was released on his own recognizance with no conditions on him.

Comey appears in court after his indictment for allegedly threatening Trump

Former FBI Director James Comey was indicted Tuesday for allegedly making threats against President Trump.

www.cbsnews.com

Then here is a guy that threatened Obama on Instagram and ended up in jail. He knew where Obama lived because Trump posted the address. That would be more of an online threat than seashells.

Jan. 6 defendant arrested near Obama's home had guns and 400 rounds of ammunition in his van

Taylor Taranto has been publicly identified as a participant in the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol since August 2021. He was arrested Thursday.

www.nbcnews.com

You're not thinking as usual.

I rely on facts. Something you seem to be unfamiliar with.

 

[Jarod]

Trump did not get arrested when he posted a photo depicting Biden tied up in the back of a truck.

 

[martin]

Trump did not get arrested when he posted a photo depicting Biden tied up in the back of a truck.

Rules don't apply to Trump. They're for everyone else.

 

[Tobytone]

You just seem to have given the perfect defense. It took more than 10 months to come to the conclusion it was a threat. Waiting 10 months proves it wasn't much of a threat since no action was taken in that 10 months.

The funny part is you don't seem to have a clue about reality. The judge in Comey's case did NOT require Comey to stay away from Trump. Comey was released on his own recognizance with no conditions on him.

Comey appears in court after his indictment for allegedly threatening Trump

Former FBI Director James Comey was indicted Tuesday for allegedly making threats against President Trump.

www.cbsnews.com

Then here is a guy that threatened Obama on Instagram and ended up in jail. He knew where Obama lived because Trump posted the address. That would be more of an online threat than seashells.

Jan. 6 defendant arrested near Obama's home had guns and 400 rounds of ammunition in his van

Taylor Taranto has been publicly identified as a participant in the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol since August 2021. He was arrested Thursday.

www.nbcnews.com

I rely on facts. Something you seem to be unfamiliar with.

I didn't say wait 10 months you moron. They investigated for 10 months. You're an idiot that doesn't know the difference. As far as your claim I don't work with facts. I never said I knew the conditions, I said likely agreed......... What you don't seem to understand because again, you're a moron, is that none of your feelings matter. None of CNN's feelings matter. None of my feelings matter. You're just an idiot making definitive claims before any evidence is known, as usual. The same goes for Renee Good and Alex Pretti, it's always the same thing with you idiots. You live in libtard fantasy land. If someone is on your side, they're innocent, if they're not libtards, they're guilty. It's really easy to be a libtard simpleton like you.

Right now I'm guessing, based on instinct alone. You pretend you're dealing in facts, lol. You don't know any facts that matter, zero, nada.

My gut tells me that Blanche doesn't like losing and a 10 month investigation isn't going to be a single picture on Instagram. I suspect there is a lot more to come. Am I right? Obviously, I think I am, but time will tell. Are you right? No, you're an idiot. You're automatically assuming they only have a picture and it's a witch-hunt designed to distract, lol. Again, time will tell.

I have history on my side. Libtards are always wrong about everything.

 

[archives]

My God you drones are so pathetic, it's getting harder to consider you idiots adults. I often wonder if I'm being punked by a 12-year-old. How these idiots believe the shit they say is a mystery. Maybe it's because so many of them are corrupt, lying, cheating, losers. People tend to think the whole world does and acts as they do or would. Every thief thinks everybody steals, every cokehead thinks, they're all doing coke, etc. etc.

High numbers of libtards cheat, lie, steal, and betray people so much, they assume everyone does the same. They live in a small delusional world. Who knows what the cause is for sure, all I know is libtards are some of the dumbest people I know. Just to be clear, I don't mean the least intelligent. Most of us know the difference and exactly what I'm talking about. I'll be happy to explain it to Chivy or any libtard that asks.

Chivy thinks Trump literally used the lives of thousands of great American soldiers to launch an unnecessary war without a plan, without any idea how to end it, no consideration to all the people that would die and might die, all to deflect from Epstein at first and now that 'he's screwed' (according to a misinformed moron) he had Comey arrested to distract from this 'quagmire'?

Chivy is as delusional as it gets. He's a radicalized drone that parrots lies without any thought. It's hilarious that he used the latest buzz word I'm suddenly hearing all the puppet masters saying, 'quagmire'. If you haven't heard it yet, you will.

Ah, yeah, Trump never had an exit plan, he still doesn’t, he thought it would be Venezuela II, he never even measured Iran blocking the Straits as proven by the after the fact shifting armaments and carriers.

And other than PR and photo op purpose Trump don’t give a rat’s as about American soldiers, don’t you remember he referred to them as suckers

He need all the deflections he can create

 

[Tobytone]

Ah, yeah, Trump never had an exit plan, he still doesn’t, he thought it would be Venezuela II, he never even measured Iran blocking the Straits as proven by the after the fact shifting armaments and carriers.

And other than PR and photo op purpose Trump don’t give a rat’s as about American soldiers, don’t you remember he referred to them as suckers

He need all the deflections he can create

Thank you for telling the class how retarded you really are. How everything I always say about libtards is absolutely true.

Hey did you know that Hakeem Jefferies said that all of his voters are fools for believing a word he says?

He said, 'After all these years, I still can't believe that I can say literally anything to my voters and they just believe it without question.' He added, 'I've been testing this more and more as the years go by and still no matter how absurd or how big the lie, his people suck it up and repeat it to others.' He also said, 'His black voters are the dumbest of all' Can you believe it? What a pig. I can prove it just as much as you can prove your claim.

I'm lying? I'll provide the evidence as soon as you provide yours. That much, I promise. If I fail to do so, I'll leave JPP forever. Just provide the Trump quote in which he calls any member of the military suckers. That's it, really easy for a guy that never lies and only believes facts. I'll wait here.

 

[Guno צְבִי]

My God you drones are so pathetic, it's getting harder to consider you idiots adults. I often wonder if I'm being punked by a 12-year-old. How these idiots believe the shit they say is a mystery. Maybe it's because so many of them are corrupt, lying, cheating, losers. People tend to think the whole world does and acts as they do or would. Every thief thinks everybody steals, every cokehead thinks, they're all doing coke, etc. etc.

High numbers of libtards cheat, lie, steal, and betray people so much, they assume everyone does the same. They live in a small delusional world. Who knows what the cause is for sure, all I know is libtards are some of the dumbest people I know. Just to be clear, I don't mean the least intelligent. Most of us know the difference and exactly what I'm talking about. I'll be happy to explain it to Chivy or any libtard that asks.

Chivy thinks Trump literally used the lives of thousands of great American soldiers to launch an unnecessary war without a plan, without any idea how to end it, no consideration to all the people that would die and might die, all to deflect from Epstein at first and now that 'he's screwed' (according to a misinformed moron) he had Comey arrested to distract from this 'quagmire'?

Chivy is as delusional as it gets. He's a radicalized drone that parrots lies without any thought. It's hilarious that he used the latest buzz word I'm suddenly hearing all the puppet masters saying, 'quagmire'. If you haven't heard it yet, you will.

So toby did you even finish HS?

 

[Nordberg]

The investigation itself was more than 10 months. It's illegal to threaten any president regardless of who you are. His or your feeling mean nothing. We have no idea what evidence they have yet. We'll know much more soon. I suspect it's significant. I don't see Blanche as a guy that likes to lose. Time will tell. Libtards are doing what they always do, acting hysterical and jumping to ridiculous conclusions that fit the constant insane narrative.

As far as your 'brilliant' point about not asking to keep him in jail. It would be quite hard to suggest that the president isn't sufficiently secured against a threat from Comey assuming he agreed to not post any more threats while this case is ongoing and agreed as I'm sure he did, not to travel anywhere Trump is. There's not a judge alive that would keep anyone charged with the same crime in jail with no prior record. Nobody is complaining about either. I'll bet if roles were reversed libtards would be rioting in the streets if he wasn't thrown in solitary until trial.

You're not thinking as usual.

Investigation? It was a fucking phone photo of what he saw on a beach. That requires no investigation. What the fuck more did they need/? What more could they find out? When Blanche said they were investigating for a year, it was laughable and absolutely unbelievable. The odds are the judge will toss the case immediately.

 

[Walt]

This prick has thought he was above the law for too long. I hope he goes away for the rest of his natural life

How dare Comey be allowed to oppose trump through speech.

Except to "86" something can have different meanings.

"Audit" can mean murder, so did trump order the murder of government employees?

There has to be a proven intent. Comey obviously meant that he wanted trump legally removed from office. The whole case is a joke.

That being said, the word "fight" is more commonly used for violence. I do not see a definition for removing a President from office through "Second Amendment means" that does not involve treason. No, trump has a much tougher defense for himself.

 

[archives]

Thank you for telling the class how retarded you really are. How everything I always say about libtards is absolutely true.

Hey did you know that Hakeem Jefferies said that all of his voters are fools for believing a word he says?

He said, 'After all these years, I still can't believe that I can say literally anything to my voters and they just believe it without question.' He added, 'I've been testing this more and more as the years go by and still no matter how absurd or how big the lie, his people suck it up and repeat it to others.' He also said, 'His black voters are the dumbest of all' Can you believe it? What a pig. I can prove it just as much as you can prove your claim.

I'm lying? I'll provide the evidence as soon as you provide yours. That much, I promise. If I fail to do so, I'll leave JPP forever. Just provide the Trump quote in which he calls any member of the military suckers. That's it, really easy for a guy that never lies and only believes facts. I'll wait here.

What the fuck does Hakeem Jeffries have to do with Trump having no exit plan on Iran? no strategy other than bomb them into oblivion? no clue regarding Iran’s Straits’s strategy nor a prepared plan to deal with it before it occurred?

If you take out all the personalized AM radio that you regurgitate in all your posts you offer little to zero content, and when do, it is often wrong, way wrong

“Why should I go to that cemetery? It’s filled with losers” - D. Trump 2018 on why he didn’t go to the Marne American Cemetery as confirmed by General Mad Dog Kelly

 

[QP!]

Trump did not get arrested when he posted a photo depicting Biden tied up in the back of a truck.

Rules don't apply to Trump. They're for everyone else.

Yup.

You need look no further than this mental midget belows contradictory posts...

Here BELOW he is pushing the view that since NO ATTEMPTS on Bidens life happened then Trump posting the threat pictures against Biden were not a crime....

How many legitimate attempts were made on Biden's life? Ever.

How many times did some loon shoot at Biden? Biden ever take a bullet?

And then a few posts later he posts the BELOW, when it comes to Comey being charged, even if no crime is linked to him he says the opposite...

wow yet another uninformed leftist who doesn't understand the law.

The threat in and of itself against the President is a crime. You don't actually have commit the act. Tell ya what sparky. Go on Twitter or Blue Social or whatever the hell you use and make a threat towards the President. Use your real name and address. See if you don't get a visit.

We could argue he is simply being dishonest or perhaps he is too dumb to see he defeated his own arguments and honestly i am not sure which it is??

 

[Teflon Don]

Yup.

You need look no further than this mental midget belows contradictory posts...

Here BELOW he is pushing the view that since NO ATTEMPTS on Bidens life happened then Trump posting the threat pictures against Biden were not a crime....



And then a few posts later he posts the BELOW, when it comes to Comey being charged, even if no crime is linked to him he says the opposite...



We could argue he is simply being dishonest or perhaps he is too dumb to see he defeated his own arguments and honestly i am not sure which it is??

wow talk about taking posts out of context and trying to conflate them. Kudos to your efforts.

The point I was making is that you leftists have been purveyors of the most outlandish claims against Trump and it is only natural that your crazy's would attempt to take his life.

That never happened with Biden.

I believe that Comey's traitorous acts along with the medias led to these nut jobs trying to take Trump's life. When all these nut jobs hear is that Trump is a threat to democracy (when he clearly isn't) they take it upon themselves to save democracy.

Hell I have even heard you leftists on this board saying you are fighting to save democracy. What self aggrandizing bullshit that is. But, there are enough of your crazy fuckers out there influenced by Comey's words that they decide it is upon them to take action. So Comey himself didn't have to attempt to take Trumps life for him to be guilty.

You guys should really brush up on the law around this topic. It would help you not look so stupid

 

[QP!]

wow talk about taking posts out of context and trying to conflate them. Kudos to your efforts.

The point I was making is that you leftists have been purveyors of the most outlandish claims against Trump and it is only natural that your crazy's would attempt to take his life.

That never happened with Biden.

I believe that Comey's traitorous acts along with the medias led to these nut jobs trying to take Trump's life. When all these nut jobs hear is that Trump is a threat to democracy (when he clearly isn't) they take it upon themselves to save democracy.

Hell I have even heard you leftists on this board saying you are fighting to save democracy. What self aggrandizing bullshit that is. But, there are enough of your crazy fuckers out there influenced by Comey's words that they decide it is upon them to take action. So Comey himself didn't have to attempt to take Trumps life for him to be guilty.

You guys should really brush up on the law around this topic. It would help you not look so stupid

So you are claiming you no longer believe this that you said and which is quite clear...

Teflon Don said:
wow yet another uninformed leftist who doesn't understand the law.

The threat in and of itself against the President is a crime. You don't actually have commit the act. ...

Because if you believe it then you believe Trump committed a crime when he posted that threat picture of Biden hog tied in the truck.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

I didn't say wait 10 months you moron. They investigated for 10 months. You're an idiot that doesn't know the difference. As far as your claim I don't work with facts. I never said I knew the conditions, I said likely agreed......... What you don't seem to understand because again, you're a moron, is that none of your feelings matter.

It took 10 months to figure out that Comey was threatening to kill the President? How stupid and incompetent are these investigators? The Secret Service interviewed Comey and saw no threat.

None of CNN's feelings matter. None of my feelings matter. You're just an idiot making definitive claims before any evidence is known, as usual. The same goes for Renee Good and Alex Pretti, it's always the same thing with you idiots. You live in libtard fantasy land. If someone is on your side, they're innocent, if they're not libtards, they're guilty. It's really easy to be a libtard simpleton like you.

This is about trying to convict someone beyond a reasonable doubt. It's not some fantasy. It is the requirement under the law.

Right now I'm guessing, based on instinct alone. You pretend you're dealing in facts, lol. You don't know any facts that matter, zero, nada.

The toddler comes out and cries about how he is so smart. The law is a fact. The picture that Comey posted is a fact. The law requires there to be an actual a threat intended in the post. That has to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. The fact is that the DoJ handbook says they are not to bring an indictment unless a conviction is almost certain.

My gut tells me that Blanche doesn't like losing and a 10 month investigation isn't going to be a single picture on Instagram. I suspect there is a lot more to come. Am I right? Obviously, I think I am, but time will tell. Are you right? No, you're an idiot. You're automatically assuming they only have a picture and it's a witch-hunt designed to distract, lol. Again, time will tell.

Your gut is about as stupid as your brain is. The indictment is for a public threat across state lines. The picture Comey posted is the only part of the indictment that meets the requirements of the law since it was the only possible public threat. At this point, the only way to make a conviction is to prove intent of a threat at the time it was posted. They don't get to argue that it became a threat six months later. There isn't a lot more to come because the way the law works doesn't allow a lot more to come. It requires proving the crime occurring at the time. Blanche seems to be familiar with losing when Trump is his client.

I have never said the indictment was to distract. That is your straw man.

I have history on my side. Libtards are always wrong about everything.

How did that first indictment of Comey and Letitia James work out? Are you so delusional you think they both went to trial and where convicted?

 

[Tobytone]

What the fuck does Hakeem Jeffries have to do with Trump having no exit plan on Iran? no strategy other than bomb them into oblivion? no clue regarding Iran’s Straits’s strategy nor a prepared plan to deal with it before it occurred?

If you take out all the personalized AM radio that you regurgitate in all your posts you offer little to zero content, and when do, it is often wrong, way wrong

“Why should I go to that cemetery? It’s filled with losers” - D. Trump 2018 on why he didn’t go to the Marne American Cemetery as confirmed by General Mad Dog Kelly

Sorry loser. First, calm down, you're so triggered you started writing like a stroke victim. Next, Jefferies has nothing to do with how stupid you are. It didn't or doesn't matter what story I made up, it's just as accurate and truthful as yours.

Being the lying little moron you are, you still thought you could put your comment in quotes and add D. Trump after it and I'd just believe it like a dumbass libtard, lol. Sorry loser. Trump never said it. Not once, not anything close, not in your wildest and sickest fantasies. It comes from a loser you likely jerkoff thinking about, Jeffery Goldberg.

If Chivy wasn't a pathetic lying radicalized moron, he would have wrote the quote like this:

"Why should I go to that cemetery? It’s filled with losers” - Jeffery Goldberg claims Trump said - No audio, transcript, or contemporaneous document have ever surfaced to verify any of those words, only anonymous sources, like always. Jeffery had many other zingers too like claiming that Trump called Marines killed in WW Eleven, "suckers." for getting killed.

Remember Chivy, you're not dealing with your fellow drones. You have to be accurate if you don't want to be made a fool. Maybe you should stick to Fowl's vanity thread. She only allows libtards like you there. You can tell lies all day long and get nothing but praise and thumbs up. Just trying to help, as usual.

I think it's appropriate for me to pass on a message that I think might have helped Lurchy a while back. Always remember that Trump loves you.

 

[Tobytone]

It took 10 months to figure out that Comey was threatening to kill the President? How stupid and incompetent are these investigators? The Secret Service interviewed Comey and saw no threat.

This is about trying to convict someone beyond a reasonable doubt. It's not some fantasy. It is the requirement under the law.

The toddler comes out and cries about how he is so smart. The law is a fact. The picture that Comey posted is a fact. The law requires there to be an actual a threat intended in the post. That has to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. The fact is that the DoJ handbook says they are not to bring an indictment unless a conviction is almost certain.

Your gut is about as stupid as your brain is. The indictment is for a public threat across state lines. The picture Comey posted is the only part of the indictment that meets the requirements of the law since it was the only possible public threat. At this point, the only way to make a conviction is to prove intent of a threat at the time it was posted. They don't get to argue that it became a threat six months later. There isn't a lot more to come because the way the law works doesn't allow a lot more to come. It requires proving the crime occurring at the time. Blanche seems to be familiar with losing when Trump is his client.

I have never said the indictment was to distract. That is your straw man.

How did that first indictment of Comey and Letitia James work out? Are you so delusional you think they both went to trial and where convicted?

Dumbass, you're repeating yourself. I don't care about your feelings. Nobody knows what they investigated for 10 months yet. I 'think' there will be much more. I'm aware of what's needed for a conviction you simpleton. Are you suggesting they don't have it? I'm sure you are, but based on what? Your feelings. I told you my feelings and I said none of them matter, including mine. You can't seem to accept that like the idiot you are.

And if you didn't say it was to distract from Iran or Epstein or whatever the current libtard hoax is, my apologies, I can't keep you morons straight. I've been dealing with several idiots like you, and you're all very much the same.

I'm not looking for a straw man at all. You ended this rant by creating your own straw man. 'What happened the last time' says the moron. What difference does that make? None, it's your straw man argument. Pretending that the last case that was thrown out by another libtard judge on a technicality has any impact or anything at all to do with this case. Great point, not.

Here's the bottom line: I'm thrilled that Comey the scumbag that clearly belongs in jail is spending money on lawyers at the very least and is possible going to be convicted regardless of how you feel or what you think they do or don't have or if you think the last case has any impact on this one matters not to me. Libtards are the last people anyone should look to for correct predictions. As I always say before we know all the facts, time will tell. Do you think you can live with that? I hope not. Right now, all either of us have is our feelings.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Dumbass, you're repeating yourself. I don't care about your feelings. Nobody knows what they investigated for 10 months yet. I 'think' there will be much more. I'm aware of what's needed for a conviction you simpleton. Are you suggesting they don't have it? I'm sure you are, but based on what? Your feelings. I told you my feelings and I said none of them matter, including mine. You can't seem to accept that like the idiot you are.

What you think violates the way the law works. You are simply arguing that your feelings are not based on reality. The indictment tells us what they supposedly investigated. Then to top it off, once an indictment occurs, the investigation is pretty much locked down. They can't keep trying to find new evidence without violating the rights of the accused.

And if you didn't say it was to distract from Iran or Epstein or whatever the current libtard hoax is, my apologies, I can't keep you morons straight. I've been dealing with several idiots like you, and you're all very much the same.

When you are delusional as you always appear, no wonder you can't tell reality of who is who.

I'm not looking for a straw man at all. You ended this rant by creating your own straw man. 'What happened the last time' says the moron. What difference does that make? None, it's your straw man argument. Pretending that the last case that was thrown out by another libtard judge on a technicality has any impact or anything at all to do with this case. Great point, not.

One doesn't look for a straw man. One builds it by claiming your opponent is making an argument they did not make.

What happened the last time only points out your delusions when you claimed that "Libtards are always wrong about everything." Clearly all those claiming that Comey and James would never go to trial but the cased would be thrown out were correct.

Here's the bottom line: I'm thrilled that Comey the scumbag that clearly belongs in jail is spending money on lawyers at the very least and is possible going to be convicted regardless of how you feel or what you think they do or don't have or if you think the last case has any impact on this one matters not to me. Libtards are the last people anyone should look to for correct predictions. As I always say before we know all the facts, time will tell. Do you think you can live with that? I hope not. Right now, all either of us have is our feelings.

So the bottom line is you are all for using the law to try to bankrupt someone even if you can't prove a crime. How very un-American of you.