No, she rejected the plea deal, she isn't considering it.
Hunter will have to make a new one or face trial on his charges.
Absolutely untrue, why do you need to lie so much?
No, she rejected the plea deal, she isn't considering it.
Hunter will have to make a new one or face trial on his charges.
Absolutely untrue, why do you need to lie so much?
They appear to be valid charges with a legit plea deal, the Trump judge wants more time to consider if she likes the plea deal or not.
Not what I get. She told them what bothered her and they are rehashing it to cover her wants and fitting it into the other deal. She wants them to bring back a deal that she can approve.
That's impossible to know and I doubt it. All that had to happen an ex, pissed off GF or his baby momma to drop a dime on his about his taxes and the IRS would have nailed him.
What lie.
Rejected plea deal leaves Hunter Biden's team fuming
https://www.axios.com/2023/07/27/rejected-plea-deal-leaves-hunter-biden-team-fuming
She isn't considering anything.
Indeed.
The ambulance chaser is caught in another lie...his 305th.
I can guarantee that the DOJ is not going to offer him another slap on the wrist after the flack they got for the last one.
If they even offer him, it may just go to trial where his defense might be thinking they have a better chance of getting a sympathetic jury.
And the charges against Hunter are still coming, is about to get nailed for FARA which he has no defense against.
The only deal I see him working out is to flip on his father to avoid prison time.
Since he is an addict that is more than possible.
I think that's the only way Hunter walks at this point.
I don't know the details, but suspect both the IRS and DOJ will do their jobs.Even in that situation, the IRS rarely prosecutes people criminally, they go after them civilly. They go after them criminally in situations where they tried to defraud them or hid assets, but not for simple failure to pay.
I don't know the details, but suspect both the IRS and DOJ will do their jobs.
If there has been political interference from any direction, then that should be investigated too.
For sure.
Clearly the IRS was prevented from doing their job.For sure.
Clearly the IRS was prevented from doing their job.
I wish I could share your confidence.I can guarantee that the DOJ is not going to offer him another slap on the wrist after the flack they got for the last one.
If they even offer him, it may just go to trial where his defense might be thinking they have a better chance of getting a sympathetic jury.
And the charges against Hunter are still coming, is about to get nailed for FARA which he has no defense against.
The only deal I see him working out is to flip on his father to avoid prison time.
Since he is an addict that is more than possible.
I think that's the only way Hunter walks at this point.
Clearly you have not listened to the IRS Whistle blowers testimonies. Hunter has not resolved his IRS problems yet. When you don't pay your taxes on time it just takes one affirmative action (one attempt to not pay what you really owe) to upgrade the charge to a felony. And that is what the IRS is supposed to do by their own rules. Hunter claimed his prostitute was an employee and he wrote off a membership to a sex club as a "golf membership". Both of which are clear attempts at evading taxes.It was during Trump. In fact, Hunter resolved the IRS problems. And the judge did not catetegorically reject the deal but said to rework it and come back.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/kellyp...hes-likely-not-going-to-jail/?sh=5980aac6b5b4A misdemeanor failure to pay can be escalated to a felony in some cases. According to the Department of Justice manual, those involve individuals who fail to file tax returns or pay a tax “but who also commit acts of evasion or obstruction.” In that case, the charges would be brought as felonies under sections 7201 or 7212(a).
Clearly the IRS was prevented from doing their job.
Although it's fuzzy, it does appear that Hunter paid his back taxes. OTOH, as the IRS points out, it's not whether he paid them or not, but that he lied about his taxes in the first place.Clearly wrong. Biden made a deal with the IRS and paid his bill. What that usually does is end the case. They just want the money.
Weiss’ office said in an earlier statement that “Hunter Biden received taxable income in excess of $1,500,000 annually in calendar years 2017 and 2018. Despite owing in excess of $100,000 in federal income taxes each year, he did not pay the income tax due for either year.”
The original deal included provisions that prosecutors would recommend probation for the tax violations, while a separate felony gun charge would be dropped if Biden met certain conditions laid out in court. It appears that now, the terms of his sentencing will be decided later.
Biden faced a separate gun charge, for illegally owning a Colt Cobra .38 Special handgun. He had conceivably reached a pretrial agreement about the issue that would delay the charges for 24 months, assuming he did not violate certain terms during that period — which included being added to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System, no use of controlled substances or alcohol and no violations of local, state or federal laws. If he followed the agreement, the charge would be dropped,
The judge would accept the agreement and then she would set a sentencing date. Now, he could face up to a year in prison on each of the two tax charges. But the prosecutors are recommending probation
Hunter Biden told associates in recent months that he paid the federal taxes that had been the subject of Justice Department scrutiny. He told one associate that the tax liability was more than $1 million, and that he had to take out a loan to pay it off.
Federal tax prosecutors generally fight to keep jurors from knowing whether defendants have paid their back tax bills, arguing that the crime happens when the return is falsely filed or not filed at all, said Jeffrey Neiman, a former Justice Department tax prosecutor and a partner at Marcus, Neiman, Rashbaum & Pineiro. Such knowledge could influence jurors, even if a judge asks them not to consider it.
Clearly the IRS was prevented from doing their job.
Why do you say that? How do you know?
Why do you say that? How do you know?