minefields are looking good as well
YES! INDEED! Easy to deploy, cost effective and an actual deterrent.
minefields are looking good as well
I posted the article, but you were too stupid to read it
Tempting as that might be, it would be a form of pollution!
Sharks will eat anything, Cap'n.
Like I have said, and posted, READ THE FUCKING LAW, AND QUIT PLAYING THE FOOL
The Supreme Court just struck down those Trumpian rules. They were unConstitutional
not true.......the laws keeping them in Mexico until they have been processed for refugee status have not been struck down......the only thing struck down is an automatic rejection for everyone who enters the country illegally before applying for refugee status.........they can still be rejected.......its just not an automatic rejection.........
For what purpose?
Honduras is a low middle-income country that faces major challenges, with more than 66 percent of the population living in poverty in 2016, according to official data. In rural areas, approximately one out of 5 Hondurans live in extreme poverty, or on less than US$1.90 per day.
https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/honduras
One is only required to accept asylum in "safe countries". Mexico does not meet that criteria.
The problem with people like you reading "law" is that you do not know how to interpret it. There is much, much more to it than that. Like this:
"What Happens to Asylum Seekers Arriving at a U.S. Border?
Noncitizens who are encountered by, or present themselves to, a U.S. official at a port of entry or near the border are subject to expedited removal, an accelerated process which authorizes DHS to perform rapid deportations of certain individuals.
To ensure that the United States does not violate international and domestic laws by returning individuals to countries where their life or liberty may be at risk, the credible fear and reasonable fear screening processes are available to asylum seekers in expedited removal processes.
Credible Fear
Individuals who are placed in expedited removal proceedings and who tell a Customs and Border Protection (CBP) official that they fear persecution, torture, or returning to their country or that they wish to apply for asylum should be referred for a credible fear screening interview conducted by an asylum officer.
If the asylum officer determines that the asylum seeker has a credible fear of persecution or torture, it means that the person has proven that he or she has a “significant possibility” of establishing eligibility for asylum or other protection under the Convention Against Torture. The individual will then be referred to immigration court to proceed with the defensive asylum application process.
If the asylum officer determines the person does not have a credible fear, the individual is ordered removed. Before deportation, the individual may appeal the negative credible fear decision by pursuing a truncated review process before an immigration judge. If the immigration judge overturns a negative credible fear finding, the individual is placed in further removal proceedings through which the individual can seek protection from removal. If the immigration judge upholds the negative finding by the asylum officer, the individual will be removed from the United States." https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/research/asylum-united-states
Hey stupid, where in that parcel of the law do you see an applicant being detained in a foreign country, and reliant on the welfare of that country?
Read the law dumb fuck.
"Individuals who are placed in expedited removal proceedings and who tell a Customs and Border Protection (CBP) official that they fear persecution, torture, or returning to their country or that they wish to apply for asylum should be referred for a credible fear screening interview conducted by an asylum officer."
Where is that part of the law being performed?
Like I have said, and posted, READ THE FUCKING LAW, AND QUIT PLAYING THE FOOL
https://www.uscis.gov/humanitarian/refugees-asylum/asylum/obtaining-asylum-united-states
Obtaining Asylum in the United States
The two ways of obtaining asylum in the United States are through the affirmative process and defensive process.
Affirmative Asylum Processing With USCIS
To obtain asylum through the affirmative asylum process you must be physically present in the United States. You may apply for asylum status regardless of how you arrived in the United States or your current immigration status.
not true.......the laws keeping them in Mexico until they have been processed for refugee status have not been struck down......the only thing struck down is an automatic rejection for everyone who enters the country illegally before applying for refugee status.........they can still be rejected.......its just not an automatic rejection.........
And what is Honduras doing, to address their countries problems??
And yet, they've signed onto the same asylum criteria that the US has; so why does the UN consider them a "safe country"??
"What it can"
Since they have such a "...extraordinarily unequal distribution of income...", shouldn't you be protesting that they REDISTRUBUTE that wealth??
Here is one example, however, tell me is there anything you will research on your own, or must you be spoonfed like a two year old?
https://www.government.nl/topics/asylum-policy/question-and-answer/list-safe-countries-of-origin
The law requires a visa. These are people attempting a criminal act.
They could have been allowed across the border as the law requires.
What is there about the "rule of law" you righties hate?