How Many More Must Die

Old Frapper said:
They could have been allowed across the border as the law requires.
Click to expand...

The law doesn't require anything of the sort you lying dumb fuck.

Old Frapper said:
What is there about the "rule of law" you righties hate?
Click to expand...

The only one's ignoring the rule of law are morons on the left and in the Democratic Party of the Jackass. Sanctuary cities violate the intent of the Constitution you dumb fuck.
 
Celticguy said:
The law requires a visa. These are people attempting a criminal act.
Click to expand...

Read the law

https://www.uscis.gov/humanitarian/refugees-asylum/asylum/obtaining-asylum-united-states

Obtaining Asylum in the United States

The two ways of obtaining asylum in the United States are through the affirmative process and defensive process.
Affirmative Asylum Processing With USCIS

To obtain asylum through the affirmative asylum process you must be physically present in the United States. You may apply for asylum status regardless of how you arrived in the United States or your current immigration status.
 
Old Frapper said:
Have you ever read the law regarding asylum? Being an idiot, I suppose you could not refrain from trying to say "anyone can cross at any time" since that is not what the law says although an exception is made for one seeking asylum:

https://www.uscis.gov/humanitarian/refugees-asylum/asylum/obtaining-asylum-united-states

Obtaining Asylum in the United States

The two ways of obtaining asylum in the United States are through the affirmative process and defensive process.
Affirmative Asylum Processing With USCIS

To obtain asylum through the affirmative asylum process you must be physically present in the United States. You may apply for asylum status regardless of how you arrived in the United States or your current immigration status.
Click to expand...

It is the pinnacle of irony when morons call others idiots while looking like morons. The law doesn't require us to let them in you dumb fuck. Read the law instead of bloviating CNN talking points snowflake.
 
Old Trapper said:
Read the law

https://www.uscis.gov/humanitarian/refugees-asylum/asylum/obtaining-asylum-united-states

Obtaining Asylum in the United States

The two ways of obtaining asylum in the United States are through the affirmative process and defensive process.
Affirmative Asylum Processing With USCIS

To obtain asylum through the affirmative asylum process you must be physically present in the United States. You may apply for asylum status regardless of how you arrived in the United States or your current immigration status.
Click to expand...

You idiot; if what you say is true, we would have to grant asylum to everyone in the world who lives in a leftist shit hole. Dunce.
 
Old Trapper said:
Read the law

https://www.uscis.gov/humanitarian/refugees-asylum/asylum/obtaining-asylum-united-states

Obtaining Asylum in the United States

The two ways of obtaining asylum in the United States are through the affirmative process and defensive process.
Affirmative Asylum Processing With USCIS

To obtain asylum through the affirmative asylum process you must be physically present in the United States. You may apply for asylum status regardless of how you arrived in the United States or your current immigration status.
Click to expand...

The problem with people like you reading "law" is that you do not know how to interpret it. There is much, much more to it than that. Like this:

"What Happens to Asylum Seekers Arriving at a U.S. Border?

Noncitizens who are encountered by, or present themselves to, a U.S. official at a port of entry or near the border are subject to expedited removal, an accelerated process which authorizes DHS to perform rapid deportations of certain individuals.

To ensure that the United States does not violate international and domestic laws by returning individuals to countries where their life or liberty may be at risk, the credible fear and reasonable fear screening processes are available to asylum seekers in expedited removal processes.

Credible Fear

Individuals who are placed in expedited removal proceedings and who tell a Customs and Border Protection (CBP) official that they fear persecution, torture, or returning to their country or that they wish to apply for asylum should be referred for a credible fear screening interview conducted by an asylum officer.

If the asylum officer determines that the asylum seeker has a credible fear of persecution or torture, it means that the person has proven that he or she has a “significant possibility” of establishing eligibility for asylum or other protection under the Convention Against Torture. The individual will then be referred to immigration court to proceed with the defensive asylum application process.

If the asylum officer determines the person does not have a credible fear, the individual is ordered removed. Before deportation, the individual may appeal the negative credible fear decision by pursuing a truncated review process before an immigration judge. If the immigration judge overturns a negative credible fear finding, the individual is placed in further removal proceedings through which the individual can seek protection from removal. If the immigration judge upholds the negative finding by the asylum officer, the individual will be removed from the United States." https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/research/asylum-united-states
 
Sailor said:
The problem with people like you reading "law" is that you do not know how to interpret it. There is much, much more to it than that. Like this:

"What Happens to Asylum Seekers Arriving at a U.S. Border?

Noncitizens who are encountered by, or present themselves to, a U.S. official at a port of entry or near the border are subject to expedited removal, an accelerated process which authorizes DHS to perform rapid deportations of certain individuals.

To ensure that the United States does not violate international and domestic laws by returning individuals to countries where their life or liberty may be at risk, the credible fear and reasonable fear screening processes are available to asylum seekers in expedited removal processes.

Credible Fear

Individuals who are placed in expedited removal proceedings and who tell a Customs and Border Protection (CBP) official that they fear persecution, torture, or returning to their country or that they wish to apply for asylum should be referred for a credible fear screening interview conducted by an asylum officer.

If the asylum officer determines that the asylum seeker has a credible fear of persecution or torture, it means that the person has proven that he or she has a “significant possibility” of establishing eligibility for asylum or other protection under the Convention Against Torture. The individual will then be referred to immigration court to proceed with the defensive asylum application process.

If the asylum officer determines the person does not have a credible fear, the individual is ordered removed. Before deportation, the individual may appeal the negative credible fear decision by pursuing a truncated review process before an immigration judge. If the immigration judge overturns a negative credible fear finding, the individual is placed in further removal proceedings through which the individual can seek protection from removal. If the immigration judge upholds the negative finding by the asylum officer, the individual will be removed from the United States." https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/research/asylum-united-states
Click to expand...

The Old Fapper won't like that, Cap'n.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top