How do Democrats count ballots?

[BartenderElite]

The thread title asked a question.

Do you understand?

I'm waiting.

I understand the question. And I also understand the implication.

Are you saying that you weren't trying to imply something? That this was merely a thread about how India counts faster than CA?

 

[Diogenes]

I understand the question. And I also understand the implication. Are you saying that you weren't trying to imply something? That this was merely a thread about how India counts faster than CA?

If that's how you choose to interpret it, that's hardly my responsibility, is it?

 

[Nordberg]

India counted 640 million ballots in 1 day.

California is still counting.

Dems? You Trumpys are weird. No matter what the result is you cry and cry. The system counts the same every time. It is an excellent system. It is checked after every election and it is amazingly accurate.
States have input. They do the state ballots as they see fit. Many do not allow mail-ins to be counted until the polls close. Strange I guess that the state with the largest population takes longer.

 

[BartenderElite]

If that's how you choose to interpret it, that's hardly my responsibility, is it?

Why not let us know what point you were trying to make w/ the OP?

Shouldn't be hard. Again - speak plainly.

 

[Diogenes]

Dems?

When did the polls close in California? It's a Blue state, right?

 

[Diogenes]

Why not let us know what point you were trying to make w/ the OP?

If you can't comprehend the written word, I'm not sure it's my issue. Maybe it's yours, eh?

 

[BartenderElite]

If you can't comprehend the written word, I'm not sure it's my issue. Maybe it's yours, eh?

So, you can't.

 

[BartenderElite]

I actually think it's obvious what you're trying to imply.

But, when challenged, you're sprinting away from that. Telling.

 

[Diogenes]

So, you can't.

So you say. I understand English. You seem to be having an issue. How can I help that?

 

[Diogenes]

I actually think it's obvious what you're trying to imply.

Your opinion hardly rises to the level of fact, does it?

 

[BartenderElite]

So you say. I understand English. You seem to be having an issue. How can I help that?

Full sprint.

 

[BartenderElite]

Classic MAGA thread. Evidence? We don't need no stinkin' evidence.

 

[Diogenes]

A lot of Republicans win in races where the vote counts take longer.

I'm still wondering if you can back up your declarative statement above, not pretending you didn't express yourself plainly.

Are you impaired, somehow?

 

[BartenderElite]

I'm still wondering if you can back up your declarative statement above, not pretending you didn't express yourself plainly.

Are you impaired, somehow?

"Still wondering?"

Have you asked me yet to "back that up?" Do you deny that Republicans have won races where the counts took more than a few days?

 

[Diogenes]

Classic MAGA thread. Evidence? We don't need no stinkin' evidence.

Evidence of what, exactly?

A question?

The two statements in the OP that you don't dispute?

 

[BartenderElite]

"Massive fraud" defines MAGA as much as anything else.

But they can never back it up. Just a lot of vague accusations.

 

[Diogenes]

Have you asked me yet to "back that up?"

You said it, not I.

Your thirst for evidence seems a bit biased to me.

 

[BartenderElite]

Evidence of what, exactly?

A question?

The two statements in the OP that you don't dispute?

What point are you trying to make w/ the OP?

Just state it. Are you afraid to state it?

 

[Diogenes]

"Massive fraud" defines MAGA as much as anything else.

Does it?

 

[BartenderElite]

Does it?

yes.