Diogenes
Nemo me impune lacessit
I mean, when I take time to start a thread - I stand by it. Maybe take some time before starting the next one.
Maybe you should.
It's completely up to you.
I mean, when I take time to start a thread - I stand by it. Maybe take some time before starting the next one.
Yes, it is so.
Maybe you should.
It's completely up to you.
I'm encouraging others, as well.
Like a support group of other Democrats afflicted with whatever cognitive dysfunction you appear to suffer from?
Is that supposed to be a zinger or something?
Still confused?
Just a question.
Like a support group of other Democrats afflicted with whatever cognitive dysfunction you appear to suffer from?
Yes, it was a question. See that punctuation mark?
Which I recognized as facetious, and you attempting what amounted to a lame zinger. I asked the question to confirm said assumption.
Alaska had to use that stupid rank choice voting nonsense tabulators, it makes them take longer than they've ever taken as all votes must go through tabulators with the algorithm to decide the election (except the Presidential vote, note that race was called later than Florida, but much earlier than Nevada).... thankfully that was the last election to use that nonsense.Some of the states where they have taken more than a week to count: Alaska, Ohio, Iowa, and Pennsylvania,
Alaska had to use that stupid rank choice voting nonsense tabulators, it makes them take longer than they've ever taken as all votes must go through tabulators with the algorithm to decide the election (except the Presidential vote, note that race was called later than Florida, but much earlier than Nevada).... thankfully that was the last election to use that nonsense.
There is no excuse for Nevada and Arizona to take seven years to count their ballots, I know they send in results using a relay of trained turtles, little people long distance runners, and Mohammed Ali, but even with that handicap it should come earlier than it did.
Alaska had to use that stupid rank choice voting nonsense tabulators, it makes them take longer than they've ever taken as all votes must go through tabulators with the algorithm to decide the election (except the Presidential vote, note that race was called later than Florida, but much earlier than Nevada).... thankfully that was the last election to use that nonsense.
There is no excuse for Nevada and Arizona to take seven years to count their ballots, I know they send in results using a relay of trained turtles, little people long distance runners, and Mohammed Ali, but even with that handicap it should come earlier than it did.
It doesn't have to be "massive" for it to work.... but no. I just think they are inept. Florida has more than 3 times their population and still manages to count votes in a reasonable amount of time.So, what's your conclusion? "Massive fraud?!!!!!!"
It doesn't have to be "massive" for it to work.... but no. I just think they are inept. Florida has more than 3 times their population and still manages to count votes in a reasonable amount of time.
There is nothing underhanded at work here.
Is that a fact?
Until someone proves otherwise.
When you make the claim, it's on you to provide evidence.
Is that how you think it works?
I hear the person making the claim bears the burden of proof.
Is she wrong?
What claim are you talking about?
There is nothing underhanded at work here.