How do Democrats count ballots?

iu

India counted 640 million ballots in 1 day.

California is still counting.
They have a Congressional race that is within 500 votes right now. I'm sure they are trying to figure out how to count some of the undervote for the Democrat, or they are asking Jena Griswold of Colorado how they can get into the BIOS of the systems so they can change it without a software record of their activity.
 
The OP is still there. What part are you struggling with? Maybe you can find a remedial English tutor willing to assist you.

It shouldn't be that hard. Why can't you do it?

Do you want us to believe that you merely wanted to show the difference between the time it takes India to count votes, and California - without any further implication?
 
They have a Congressional race that is within 500 votes right now. I'm sure they are trying to figure out how to count some of the undervote for the Democrat, or they are asking Jena Griswold of Colorado how they can get into the BIOS of the systems so they can change it without a software record of their activity.

You're "sure" of that?
 
They have a Congressional race that is within 500 votes right now. I'm sure they are trying to figure out how to count some of the undervote for the Democrat, or they are asking Jena Griswold of Colorado how they can get into the BIOS of the systems so they can change it without a software record of their activity.

Interesting.

Maybe you could use simpler terms so the Democrats in this thread can grasp your meaning.
 
Democrats like to see that Trump is below 50%. I mean - why not?

But the OP is suggesting that there is something suspicious about taking more than a few days to count ballots. Which happens in every single election, and we've seen both Democrats & Republicans win after these long counts.
Question...

Why does it perpetual counting once the election is finished only seem to happen in blue Democrat run states...?
 
Interesting.

Maybe you could use simpler terms so the Democrats in this thread can grasp your meaning.
About 2/3 of the way through early voting we found out that Jena Griswold's office had published the BIOS passwords to 63 out of 64 of Colorado Counties using the tabulators with BIOS systems (there was one county who didn't use the systems, their passwords remained secure, you weren't required to use Colorado SOS specific machines if you had less than 1000 registered voters in the county, so... that should tell us all something).

Anyway, not only did we find out she had the passwords out there published, but that she knew about it as well and had known for more than 2 months before she was outed and that they had text conversations saying how they were not going to tell ANY of the County Clerks that there had been a security risk because it would bring negative attention to the office. BTW, if you knowingly allow such things to happen it is a Felony in this state... While Tina Peters was on trial for supposed data breach "scheme" and got 9 years, Jena Griswold's office was purposefully ignoring security breaches because it might get the press to publish stories that embarrassed her.

During a hearing before a leftist judge cybersecurity experts demonstrated how they could make changes to the systems tabulators without a record through the BIOS while the SOS "expert" they hired after firing the person that had published the passwords told that same judge that there was "no security risk"... can you guess whether or not we reset passwords, reset and retested systems, and started counts over based on that information?
 
Back
Top