The OP is still there. What part are you struggling with? Maybe you can find a remedial English tutor willing to assist you.
How do Democrats count ballots?
- Thread starter Diogenes
- Start date
The OP is still there. What part are you struggling with? Maybe you can find a remedial English tutor willing to assist you.
So you say. You're entitled to your opinions. The moderators here won't block you for expressing them. This isn't Bluesky.
They have a Congressional race that is within 500 votes right now. I'm sure they are trying to figure out how to count some of the undervote for the Democrat, or they are asking Jena Griswold of Colorado how they can get into the BIOS of the systems so they can change it without a software record of their activity.
India counted 640 million ballots in 1 day.
California is still counting.
BartenderElite
Verified User
It shouldn't be that hard. Why can't you do it?
Do you want us to believe that you merely wanted to show the difference between the time it takes India to count votes, and California - without any further implication?
BartenderElite
Verified User
You're "sure" of that?
Interesting.
Maybe you could use simpler terms so the Democrats in this thread can grasp your meaning.
It must be very hard for you. I'm not sure I can help.
BartenderElite
Verified User
See that?
Just w/ that - it's clear what you're trying to imply w/ the OP. And what you've been denying that you're trying to imply.
BartenderElite
Verified User
It IS hard for me when MAGA keeps implying that things are rigged, and "stolen" - and then produce ABSOLUTELY ZERO EVIDENCE OF THAT.
I guess MAGA's just don't understand the importance of election integrity.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
Question...
Why does it perpetual counting once the election is finished only seem to happen in blue Democrat run states...?
BartenderElite
Verified User
I'm gonna guess that you have never actually looked into that assertion.
I gathered as much.
If jumping to conclusions was an Olympic event, you may be qualified.
BartenderElite
Verified User
Cherrypicking someone's post for a quickie is an acknoledgment.
Thank you.
BartenderElite
Verified User
I mean, when I take time to start a thread - I stand by it.
Maybe take some time before starting the next one.
Maybe take some time before starting the next one.
BartenderElite
Verified User
Some of the states where they have taken more than a week to count: Alaska, Ohio, Iowa, and Pennsylvania,
About 2/3 of the way through early voting we found out that Jena Griswold's office had published the BIOS passwords to 63 out of 64 of Colorado Counties using the tabulators with BIOS systems (there was one county who didn't use the systems, their passwords remained secure, you weren't required to use Colorado SOS specific machines if you had less than 1000 registered voters in the county, so... that should tell us all something).
Anyway, not only did we find out she had the passwords out there published, but that she knew about it as well and had known for more than 2 months before she was outed and that they had text conversations saying how they were not going to tell ANY of the County Clerks that there had been a security risk because it would bring negative attention to the office. BTW, if you knowingly allow such things to happen it is a Felony in this state... While Tina Peters was on trial for supposed data breach "scheme" and got 9 years, Jena Griswold's office was purposefully ignoring security breaches because it might get the press to publish stories that embarrassed her.
During a hearing before a leftist judge cybersecurity experts demonstrated how they could make changes to the systems tabulators without a record through the BIOS while the SOS "expert" they hired after firing the person that had published the passwords told that same judge that there was "no security risk"... can you guess whether or not we reset passwords, reset and retested systems, and started counts over based on that information?
Is that so?
BartenderElite
Verified User
Yes, it is so.