Horowitz devastated the left and deep state today

Darth Omar said:
Basically, Horowitz was unable to conclude bias.

Must be a pretty high bar to clear lol. An obvious telltale of bias is that all of the ‘mistakes’ pointed in the same direction. IOW, no one ‘accidentally omitted’ something nefarious about Carter Page or etc. What else do you need to know?

I started a thread on how chance errors could be eliminated. There were something like 26 ‘errors’ made in the investigation; if all of them point in the same direction—chance is eliminated due to the sheer improbability of that many occurrences all going the same way. And if chance gets eliminated that leaves intent. There’s no third option.

But none of this matters in the long run. Durham isn’t working under the same constraints as Horowitz.
Click to expand...

"Durham isn’t working under the same constraints as Horowitz."
^^^^ Bingo :cool:

And, Horowitz did say numerous times that he handed those decisions to Barr & Durham regarding FISA bias
because it is THEY who did a more complete investigation in that area.
 
Stretch said:
"Durham isn’t working under the same constraints as Horowitz."
^^^^ Bingo :cool:

And, Horowitz did say numerous times that he handed those decisions to Barr & Durham regarding FISA bias
because it is THEY who did a more complete investigation in that area.
Click to expand...

I was skeptical of Horowitz going in but I think he did a decent job.
 
StoneByStone said:
Tick Tock!! :laugh:
Click to expand...

In this brief exchange, Cruz focuses on the report of an attorney who altered documents in order to support the FBI’s FISA warrant application renewal. Did an FBI attorney really create “fraudulent evidence” to ensure the renewal of Page’s surveillance, Cruz wondered — and Horowitz confirmed it:

Cruz: “A lawyer at the FBI creates fraudulent evidence, alters an email that is in turn used as the basis for a sworn statement for the court that the court relies on. Am I stating that accurately?"

IG HOROWITZ: “That is correct. That is what occurred.”
 
floridafan said:
Lets face it, hand job you didn't read the first page of the report. There is not a single sentence that says anything about Obama breaking the law. All you got are lies
Click to expand...

The MISCREANTS Horowitz NAILED TO THE WALL were ALL OBAMA'S PEOPLE, DIMWIT.
 
Althea said:
What he knew, and we all now know, is that trump is a Russian operative who hired other Russian operatives to run his campaign.What we also know, is that Obama took office in Jan. '09
Click to expand...

:laugh:

D4cbB4_XoAA_Oov.jpg


Former Pres.Mommy pants was Putin's BITCH, from Day One....
 
dukkha said:
bombshells like the spying
and the fact Comey had nothing to suggest a special counsel except his temper for being fired by Trump
~~

:rofl2::rofl2::rofl2: ....da Russians!.... :rofl2::rofl2::rofl2:
Click to expand...

But Trump was ‘obstructing’ the Investigation to Nowhere lol!

And who the hell is Comey to ‘suggest’ anything? He deserved to be fired. Comey’s suggestion was picked up by congress because the Fake Dossier/likely Russian propaganda was running hot at the time. And what do you know, the sons of bitches got Mullet appointed.

How is it even possible for people to *not see* how jacked-up that is?
 
Truth Detector said:
Here's why:

Horowitz: Was your investigation based on bias?

Peter Paul Strzok II: No.

Horowitz: Okay.
Click to expand...

Notice how every single time that Horowitz was asked about bias, he very strategically inserted 2 adjectives..."documentary & testimonial".
He never allowed the Dems to get away with using the simple word 'bias'. He clarified that all day long. Smart man.
When he questioned people and asked them if they were politically biased...
if they answered in written form (documents) or verbal form (testimony) he simply recorded their response. :cool:
 
volsrock said:
In this brief exchange, Cruz focuses on the report of an attorney who altered documents in order to support the FBI’s FISA warrant application renewal. Did an FBI attorney really create “fraudulent evidence” to ensure the renewal of Page’s surveillance, Cruz wondered — and Horowitz confirmed it:

Cruz: “A lawyer at the FBI creates fraudulent evidence, alters an email that is in turn used as the basis for a sworn statement for the court that the court relies on. Am I stating that accurately?"

IG HOROWITZ: “That is correct. That is what occurred.”
Click to expand...

You know that doesn't invalidate the entire investigation, right? And it doesn't mean the Deep State is after Saint Trump.
 
Stretch said:
Notice how every single time that Horowitz was asked about bias, he very strategically inserted 2 adjectives..."documentary & testimonial".
He never allowed the Dems to get away with using the simple word 'bias'. He clarified that all day long. Smart man.
When he questioned people and asked them if they were politically biased...
if they answered in written form (documents) or verbal form (testimony) he simply recorded their response. :cool:
Click to expand...

Yep; that is the key. It indicates to me a level of dishonesty from him.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top