Horowitz devastated the left and deep state today

Teflon Don

I'm back baby
I have to admit I wasn’t expecting much out of Horowitz.

After reading his entire report which JPP leftists obviously haven’t it is clear Obama broke the law

I can’t wait for Durham
 
I have to admit I wasn’t expecting much out of Horowitz.

After reading his entire report which JPP leftists obviously haven’t it is clear Obama broke the law

I can’t wait for Durham

Lets face it, hand job you didn't read the first page of the report. There is not a single sentence that says anything about Obama breaking the law. All you got are lies
 
I have to admit I wasn’t expecting much out of Horowitz.

After reading his entire report which JPP leftists obviously haven’t it is clear Obama broke the law

I can’t wait for Durham

This post is laughable.
 
It is amazing what Jedi mind tricks the rightys can do to themselves. Teflon Dumb cannot have gotten that out of the report unless he has vulpined his brain into smithereens.
 
Lets face it, hand job you didn't read the first page of the report. There is not a single sentence that says anything about Obama breaking the law. All you got are lies

All of this happened under Obama’s watch. What did he know and when did he know it. The buck stops with him.
 
All of this happened under Obama’s watch. What did he know and when did he know it. The buck stops with him.

Best case scenario is Obama ran a loose ship lol.

If he wasn’t in on it, some people went rogue—which is entirely possible. Former AG Lynch would be the one responsible for asking/telling about using spy methods on a major presidential campaign.

She’d be the logical fall person that protects The Obama.
 
h24B874BE
 
I have to admit I wasn’t expecting much out of Horowitz.

After reading his entire report which JPP leftists obviously haven’t it is clear Obama broke the law

I can’t wait for Durham
Then you didn't read the report. But we knew that. Horowitz said that no laws were broken.
 
All of this happened under Obama’s watch. What did he know and when did he know it. The buck stops with him.


What he knew, and we all now know, is that trump is a Russian operative who hired other Russian operatives to run his campaign.

What we also know, is that Obama took office in Jan. '09


[FONT=&quot]*In 2002, the FISA court revealed that FBI agents had false or misleading claims in 75 cases and a top FBI counterterrorism official was prohibited from ever appearing before the court again.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]*In 2005, FISA chief judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly proposed requiring FBI agents to swear to the accuracy of the information they presented; that never happened because it could have “slowed such investigations drastically,” the Washington Post reported. So FBI agents continued to have a license to exploit FISA secrecy to lie to the judges.[/FONT]
 
Can't make this stuff up. The House is in session tonight, right? Just heard Nadless
say "We cannot rely on an election to solve our problems." :laugh:
 
What he knew, and we all now know, is that trump is a Russian operative who hired other Russian operatives to run his campaign.

What we also know, is that Obama took office in Jan. '09
Its faux outrage, because they got nothing else.
 
Here is Horowitz stating clearly what I tried to explain earlier to a few people who didn't understand that there
is a difference between finding bias with OPENING the investigation and bias where it concerns the FISA issues.

DOJ IG Michael Horowitz Appears to Admit Political Motives Might Have Played a Role in FISA Abuse


 
Here is Horowitz stating clearly what I tried to explain earlier to a few people who didn't understand that there
is a difference between finding bias with OPENING the investigation and bias where it concerns the FISA issues.

DOJ IG Michael Horowitz Appears to Admit Political Motives Might Have Played a Role in FISA Abuse

Basically, Horowitz was unable to conclude bias.

Must be a pretty high bar to clear lol. An obvious telltale of bias is that all of the ‘mistakes’ pointed in the same direction. IOW, no one ‘accidentally omitted’ something nefarious about Carter Page or etc. What else do you need to know?

I started a thread on how chance errors could be eliminated. There were something like 26 ‘errors’ made in the investigation; if all of them point in the same direction—chance is eliminated due to the sheer improbability of that many occurrences all going the same way. And if chance gets eliminated that leaves intent. There’s no third option.

But none of this matters in the long run. Durham isn’t working under the same constraints as Horowitz.
 
Back
Top