.
I may be splitting hairs ... but was she dismissed or just not used? Seems to me that dismissal would be for a cause.
That’s more than ‘splitting hairs’. She was an alternate. She was NOT dismissed.
.
I may be splitting hairs ... but was she dismissed or just not used? Seems to me that dismissal would be for a cause.
That’s more than ‘splitting hairs’. She was an alternate. She was NOT dismissed.
She was dismissed after closing arguments...one of two.... before deliberations....That’s more than ‘splitting hairs’. She was an alternate. She was NOT dismissed.
Alternates are nothing more than spectators. They have no interaction with the 12 jurors or judge whatsoever (unless the judge calls on them). None. Their opinion is meaningless. No more than another reporter's opinion who was at the trial. 15 minutes of fame...
She was dismissed after closing arguments...one of two.... before deliberations....
Alternates are nothing more than spectators. They have no interaction with the 12 jurors or judge whatsoever (unless the judge calls on them). None. Their opinion is meaningless. No more than another reporter's opinion who was at the trial. 15 minutes of fame...
Yes, three convictions of Chauvin, including murder.
WTF?? Yeah, I heard of the verdict. What is your point?
I guess the folks at CBS news disagreed with you. Just another juror who heard the evidence and would have convicted. Which tosses your 'intimidation' narrative out the window. Because it was always just laughably stupid.
But she was dismissed.....I've not insulted any jurors....I simply expressed my opinion....if you don't agree, that's fine....Because she was an alternate. That's not 'dismissed'. She was no longer needed. You haven't answered my question. Why do you keep insulting these jurors by suggesting that they acted inappropriately? I assume that's projection on your part.
Let them. Then they were never a foreman on a jury in Federal court. I was. The alternates are meaningless unless called upon by the judge. Fact. Period.
But she was dismissed.....I've not insulted any jurors....I simply expressed my opinion....if you don't agree, that's fine....
Notice, I didn't insult you either...you, on the other hand, continually feel the need to insult me...and others, it seems....Why?
I've insulted no one....Your passive aggressive nature always amuses me. 'Who, me'? Should be your middle name. Oh, and don't forget that fucking annoying wink emoticon you completely overuse. But yes, you have been insulting the jurors since the verdict.
'They were intimidated into voting for conviction'
'I wonder why she was dismissed. What did she know about the case before hand'.
Passive aggressive insults are still insults. They are just usually slung by cowards like you.
My point is that what you said was worthless.
Apparently your comprehension issues are flaring up again. They do that often, don't they? You should be checked, you seem to have a severe case of ADHD.
So what?
You should soak your head in sulfuric acid.
I've insulted no one....
Interesting "quotes"...![]()