‘He was guilty.’ Extra juror in favor of Chauvin conviction

B

BidenPresident

Verified User
MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — An alternate juror at the trial of Derek Chauvin said she agreed with the jury’s decision to convict him in George Floyd’s death, saying she saw Chauvin as the leader of officers at the scene and that he brushed off warnings by bystanders that Floyd was in danger.

“I felt he was guilty,” Lisa Christensen said on “CBS This Morning” in a story aired Thursday. “I didn’t know if it was going to be guilty on all counts, but I would have said guilty.”

https://apnews.com/article/derek-chauvin-alternate-juror-bf3c3fe7110702e0e69d948fdba9c5ba
 
BidenPresident said:
MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — An alternate juror at the trial of Derek Chauvin said she agreed with the jury’s decision to convict him in George Floyd’s death, saying she saw Chauvin as the leader of officers at the scene and that he brushed off warnings by bystanders that Floyd was in danger.

“I felt he was guilty,” Lisa Christensen said on “CBS This Morning” in a story aired Thursday. “I didn’t know if it was going to be guilty on all counts, but I would have said guilty.”

https://apnews.com/article/derek-chauvin-alternate-juror-bf3c3fe7110702e0e69d948fdba9c5ba
Click to expand...

Wow, she sure seems intimidated. LOL.
 
Why is she on National TV? Good to know her "decision" was influenced by the "bystanders"....I wonder if she mentioned that when interviewed for jury selection? :thumbsup:
 
BidenPresident said:
Where did she mention bystanders?
Click to expand...
"Originally Posted by BidenPresident View Post
MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — An alternate juror at the trial of Derek Chauvin said she agreed with the jury’s decision to convict him in George Floyd’s death, saying she saw Chauvin as the leader of officers at the scene and that he brushed off warnings by bystanders that Floyd was in danger."
 
TOP said:
"Originally Posted by BidenPresident View Post
MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — An alternate juror at the trial of Derek Chauvin said she agreed with the jury’s decision to convict him in George Floyd’s death, saying she saw Chauvin as the leader of officers at the scene and that he brushed off warnings by bystanders that Floyd was in danger."
Click to expand...

And?
 
TOP said:
Why is she on National TV? Good to know her "decision" was influenced by the "bystanders"....I wonder if she mentioned that when interviewed for jury selection? :thumbsup:
Click to expand...

OMFG seriously? The bystanders testified, dimwit.
 
Why is she on National TV? Interesting comments.... Did she have prior knowledge of the case? The video...the bystanders?
 
TOP said:
As I posted before:
Why is she on National TV? Good to know her "decision" was influenced by the "bystanders"....I wonder if she mentioned that when interviewed for jury selection?
Click to expand...

Why shouldn't she be on National TV? She was on the jury of a high profile case. Those individuals are interviewed all the time. Why would she have mentioned that during jury selection? Did she have a time machine so she could hear their testimony before she was placed on the jury? Finally, how do you manage to get out of bed in the morning without specific instructions? You seem completely incapable of an intelligent thought.
 
TOP said:
Why is she on National TV? Interesting comments.... Did she have prior knowledge of the case? The video...the bystanders?
Click to expand...

One more time, because you appear to be too stupid to understand the first time. THE BYSTANDERS TESTIFIED. THE VIDEO WAS SHOWN IN THE COURTROOM. Is it your intention to be an annoying as fuck troll? If so, mission accomplished. If you are attempting to say something intelligent.... not so much.
 
Concart said:
One more time, because you appear to be too stupid to understand the first time. THE BYSTANDERS TESTIFIED. THE VIDEO WAS SHOWN IN THE COURTROOM. Is it your intention to be an annoying as fuck troll? If so, mission accomplished. If you are attempting to say something intelligent.... not so much.
Click to expand...

TOP TROLL
 
Concart said:
Why shouldn't she be on National TV? She was on the jury of a high profile case. Those individuals are interviewed all the time. Why would she have mentioned that during jury selection? Did she have a time machine so she could hear their testimony before she was placed on the jury? Finally, how do you manage to get out of bed in the morning without specific instructions? You seem completely incapable of an intelligent thought.
Click to expand...
Why would she be? I wonder if she had prior knowledge of the videos/witnesses/the case?
I thought you said you've served on a jury before, so you would understand the selection process...now I'm not sure I believe you...;)
 
Concart said:
One more time, because you appear to be too stupid to understand the first time. THE BYSTANDERS TESTIFIED. THE VIDEO WAS SHOWN IN THE COURTROOM. Is it your intention to be an annoying as fuck troll? If so, mission accomplished. If you are attempting to say something intelligent.... not so much.
Click to expand...
Good thing she was dismissed....Did she have prior knowledge of the case?
Did any of the jurors?
 
.
TOP said:
Good thing she was dismissed....Did she have prior knowledge of the case?
Did any of the jurors?
Click to expand...

I may be splitting hairs ... but was she dismissed or just not used? Seems to me that dismissal would be for a cause.
 
TOP said:
Good thing she was dismissed....Did she have prior knowledge of the case?
Did any of the jurors?
Click to expand...

She wasn’t dismissed. She was an alternate. Why do you keep asking the same stupid and entirely irrelevant question. She was accepted by both the prosecution and the defense. Why do you continue to insult these jurors?
 
TOP said:
Why would she be? I wonder if she had prior knowledge of the videos/witnesses/the case?
I thought you said you've served on a jury before, so you would understand the selection process...now I'm not sure I believe you...;)
Click to expand...

Of course I understand the process. You don’t. You think the attorneys didn’t ask her? You are just mind numbingly stupid.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top