Happy Trayvon Martin Day

[Cancel 2016.2]

We know he left his vehicle and was told not to follow Trayvon. Why was he out of his car?

Again you are going off of the bullshit the media spewed forth originally. Zimmerman was out of the car already when talking to police. He was following Martin and answering questions of the police while doing so. The police then told Zimmerman to stop following Martin and Zimmerman says he was returning to his car.

There is also testimony that Zimmerman questioned Trayvon. It's not just speculation. There is plenty of proof that the criminal Zimmerman was stalking and harassing a boy out to buy candy.

1) Asking someone a question is not a crime.
2) following someone is not necessarily stalking someone.
3) What did he do to harass Martin?

But somehow Zimmerman is justified in killing the young boy and becomes your hero because he was too pathetic to defend himself without a gun.

Saying 'young boy' doesn't change the fact that he was taller than Zimmerman. It doesn't change the fact that Martin beat the crap out of him.

Tell us, if you aren't able to defend yourself against a stronger opponent without a weapon, are you supposed to just sit there and take the beating?

Zimmerman had no business creating the situation.

So you don't think citizens watch groups should exist? People should not look out for their homes and their neighbors? Just call the cops and hope they show up in time?

 

[zappasguitar]

I will be validated and proven victorious when the hero zimmerman walks free. Zimmerman will walk free and the criminal trayvon will be in the ground where he belongs. Only a few more months until laughageddon slams into JPP.

Yet your reputation as a reasonable person will remain damaged loooooooooong after the laughter fades.

 

[Taichiliberal]

I will be validated and proven victorious when the hero zimmerman walks free. Zimmerman will walk free and the criminal trayvon will be in the ground where he belongs. Only a few more months until laughageddon slams into JPP.

And what crime did Martin commit exactly that warranted Zimmerman following and confronting him, jackass. Unless he was clairvoyant and knew about some teenage misdemeanors in high school. I'll wait.

 

[christiefan915]

there is zero evidence trayvon reacted in self defense. It doesn't exist. The only evidence we have is that he viciously assaulted zimmerman. As such, that is how I judge the situation.

The only evidence we have is from the shmuck who has a vested interest in keeping his ass from prison.

 

[zappasguitar]

if anyone wants to respond to zappas on my behalf please do so, I am ignoring him as I simply can't be bothered with him.

We understand...you probably don't like getting schooled by a guy you talk down to all the time.

 

[Taichiliberal]

Please show where it was established when Zimmerman got out of his car and when he was talking to the dispatch, because there was that point where he had to stop and look at the street sign to get his bearings. I'll wait.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

Douchebag, learn the difference between assault and battery.

I understand the difference. Do you?

Zimmerman is not a cop and he had no valid reason to suspect Trayvon of a crime. Therefore, he had no valid reason to pursue or confront him.

Evidence suggests it was Martin that confronted Zimmerman and not the other way around. No valid reason other than the fact that numerous breakins had been occuring in the neighborhood involving young black men who weren't from the neighborhood? No reason other than that you mean?

There is proof that he attempted to stop Trayvon.

Really? Please provide that proof.

His own claims indicate it as did the police dispatch call.

link us up to the portion of the call that makes you think he did...

Why was he outside of his car? Supposedly, Trayvon's gf heard Zimmerman attempting to question Trayvon.

Again, asking someone questions:

1) Is not against the law
2) is not justification for someone to beat the shit out of you

 

[zappasguitar]

Surprised people took your flamebait?

Nice to know that, despite all the high-minded rhetoric, at the heart of the much vaunted "trinity" there lies just another flame-baiting, asswipe troll.

Trayvon got what he deserved and I am glad he is dead. The world is a better place with him being worm food.

Flamebaiting.


Asswipe.


Troll.

 

[cancel2 2022]

And very nearly as funny as your little butthurt tantrum the other day.

Don't get upset, it was funny albeit inaccurate.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

And what crime did Martin commit exactly that warranted Zimmerman following and confronting him, jackass. Unless he was clairvoyant and knew about some teenage misdemeanors in high school. I'll wait.

Again... there were repeated break ins in the area involving young black men not from the neighborhood. Following someone is not against the law jackass. Asking questions is not against the law.

Beating the shit out of someone is against the law.

 

[cancel2 2022]

And very nearly as funny as your little butthurt tantrum the other day.

Which one?

 

[USFREEDOM911]

I refute that GZ is a "hero" for killing an unarmed person. I call people like that "cowards".

So that women who shot the guy who broke into her home, is a coward.
It's obvious that your hypocrisy knows no bounds.

 

[Cancel 2016.11]

Which one?

Tom has a legit question here zap. He is right he does throw a lot butthurt tantrums. You really do need to be more specific.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

Tom has a legit question here zap. He is right he does throw a lot butthurt tantrums. You really do need to be more specific.

LMAO... as soon as I read that, I knew you would be on here to bust him on it...

One must choose words carefully...

 

[Timshel]

saying "hey what's up" is not grounds for being beaten to a pulp.

There is zero evidence zimmerman initiated any type of confrontation. There is plenty of evidence that trayvon jumped zimmerman and savagely beat him.

And according to zimmermans testimony he was walking back to his car when trayvon came out and attacked him. Zimmerman is recorded on the phone with saying to them that he had lost site of trayvon before being attacked.

It might help if you watch the video online that shows the path zimmerman took that night. It really can clarify some of this stuff up for you. Zimmerman was feet from his car when he was attacked.

Bullshit, there is evidence that Zimmerman confronted Trayvon. You might not find it compelling.

He was returning to his car after leaving it for what reason? This is the part that does not add up. It does not matter how far he was from his car. He should not have been in armed pursuit of Trayvon.

 

[Timshel]

Again you are going off of the bullshit the media spewed forth originally. Zimmerman was out of the car already when talking to police. He was following Martin and answering questions of the police while doing so. The police then told Zimmerman to stop following Martin and Zimmerman says he was returning to his car.



1) Asking someone a question is not a crime.
2) following someone is not necessarily stalking someone.
3) What did he do to harass Martin?



Saying 'young boy' doesn't change the fact that he was taller than Zimmerman. It doesn't change the fact that Martin beat the crap out of him.

Tell us, if you aren't able to defend yourself against a stronger opponent without a weapon, are you supposed to just sit there and take the beating?



So you don't think citizens watch groups should exist? People should not look out for their homes and their neighbors? Just call the cops and hope they show up in time?

Saying criminal does not change the fact that Trayvon was simply going out for candy.

You should not confront someone unless you are capable of defending yourself with commensurate force. If you are like Grind's hero, too useless to defend yourself against a young boy then you should leave the job to the cops.

Citizen's watch groups should WATCH! They should not be in armed pursuit of suspects. Trayvon was not violating anyone's property or person. Zimmerman, a criminal without sufficient training, decided he was suspicious based on virtually nothing.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Whether someone feels that Zimmerman should or should not have been following Martin, has no bearing on what eventually occured; because once Zimmerman stopped trying to follow Martin, the situation changes.
Zimmerman is walking back to his car, he is no longer a threat to Martin (perceived or otherwise), and Martin confronting Zimmerman makes Martin the aggressor.
There are no wounds on Martin, other then an entrance wound that has been shown to have been fired at an upward angle (which is consitant from someone doing so, while being on the ground).
Zimmerman, on the other hand, shows numerous wounds; that were inflicted by being beaten, while laying on the ground.

Everything past this is nothing more then speculation by those who have already decided the outcome of this.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Again you are going off of the bullshit the media spewed forth originally. Zimmerman was out of the car already when talking to police. He was following Martin and answering questions of the police while doing so. The police then told Zimmerman to stop following Martin and Zimmerman says he was returning to his car.



1) Asking someone a question is not a crime.
2) following someone is not necessarily stalking someone.
3) What did he do to harass Martin?



Saying 'young boy' doesn't change the fact that he was taller than Zimmerman. It doesn't change the fact that Martin beat the crap out of him.

Tell us, if you aren't able to defend yourself against a stronger opponent without a weapon, are you supposed to just sit there and take the beating?



So you don't think citizens watch groups should exist? People should not look out for their homes and their neighbors? Just call the cops and hope they show up in time?

You might not want to call 911 in Chicago; because they probably won't respond.

 

[Timshel]

Whether someone feels that Zimmerman should or should not have been following Martin, has no bearing on what eventually occured; because once Zimmerman stopped trying to follow Martin, the situation changes.
Zimmerman is walking back to his car, he is no longer a threat to Martin (perceived or otherwise), and Martin confronting Zimmerman makes Martin the aggressor.
There are no wounds on Martin, other then an entrance wound that has been shown to have been fired at an upward angle (which is consitant from someone doing so, while being on the ground).
Zimmerman, on the other hand, shows numerous wounds; that were inflicted by being beaten, while laying on the ground.

Everything past this is nothing more then speculation by those who have already decided the outcome of this.

Sure it does. Even stand your ground does not justify pursue and confront. Other than Zimmerman, who says he stopped trying to follow Martin?

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/04/12/affidavit-alleges-george-zimmerman-confronted-trayvon-martin/

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Sure it does. Even stand your ground does not justify pursue and confront. Other than Zimmerman, who says he stopped trying to follow Martin?

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/04/12/affidavit-alleges-george-zimmerman-confronted-trayvon-martin/

By your question, it's apparent that you have nothing but supposition to try and bolster your speculation.
What proof do you have that shows he was still persuing Martin.
(I'll keep the fact that he had told the dispatcher where he was, when he lost sight of Martin, and the fact that he was assaulted by Martin by his car; until later)